Jongil Lim1, Ji Young Kwon1, Juhee Song2, Hosoon Choi3, Jong Chul Shin1, In Yang Park4. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea. 2. Department of Biostatistics, Scott & White Health Care, TX, USA; Department of Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, TX, USA. 3. Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, TX, USA. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address: ooooobbbbb@catholic.ac.kr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The interpretation of the fetal heart rate (FHR) signal considering labor progression may improve perinatal morbidity and mortality. However, there have been few studies that evaluate the fetus in each labor stage quantitatively. AIM: To evaluate whether the entropy indices of FHR are different according to labor progression. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective comparative study of FHR recordings in three groups: 280 recordings in the second stage of labor before vaginal delivery, 31 recordings in the first stage of labor before emergency cesarean delivery, and 23 recordings in the pre-labor before elective cesarean delivery. SUBJECTS: The stored FHR recordings of external cardiotocography during labor. OUTCOME MEASURES: Approximate entropy (ApEn) and sample entropy (SampEn) for the final 2000 RR intervals. RESULTS: The median ApEn and SampEn for the 2000 RR intervals showed the lowest values in the second stage of labor, followed by the emergency cesarean group and the elective cesarean group for all time segments (all P<0.001). Also, in the second stage of labor, the final 5 min of 2000 RR intervals had a significantly lower median ApEn (0.49 vs. 0.44, P=0.001) and lower median SampEn (0.34 vs. 0.29, P<0.001) than the initial 5 min of 2000 RR intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Entropy indices of FHR were significantly different according to labor progression. This result supports the necessity of considering labor progression when developing intrapartum fetal monitoring using the entropy indices of FHR.
BACKGROUND: The interpretation of the fetal heart rate (FHR) signal considering labor progression may improve perinatal morbidity and mortality. However, there have been few studies that evaluate the fetus in each labor stage quantitatively. AIM: To evaluate whether the entropy indices of FHR are different according to labor progression. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective comparative study of FHR recordings in three groups: 280 recordings in the second stage of labor before vaginal delivery, 31 recordings in the first stage of labor before emergency cesarean delivery, and 23 recordings in the pre-labor before elective cesarean delivery. SUBJECTS: The stored FHR recordings of external cardiotocography during labor. OUTCOME MEASURES: Approximate entropy (ApEn) and sample entropy (SampEn) for the final 2000 RR intervals. RESULTS: The median ApEn and SampEn for the 2000 RR intervals showed the lowest values in the second stage of labor, followed by the emergency cesarean group and the elective cesarean group for all time segments (all P<0.001). Also, in the second stage of labor, the final 5 min of 2000 RR intervals had a significantly lower median ApEn (0.49 vs. 0.44, P=0.001) and lower median SampEn (0.34 vs. 0.29, P<0.001) than the initial 5 min of 2000 RR intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Entropy indices of FHR were significantly different according to labor progression. This result supports the necessity of considering labor progression when developing intrapartum fetal monitoring using the entropy indices of FHR.
Authors: Samantha McDonald; Nichelle A Satterfield; Linda E May; Edward R Newton; Jeffrey Livingston; Xiangming Fang Journal: Health Sci Rep Date: 2018-08-13
Authors: Maria Ribeiro; João Monteiro-Santos; Luísa Castro; Luís Antunes; Cristina Costa-Santos; Andreia Teixeira; Teresa S Henriques Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2021-11-30