Ming-Ping Wu1, Chia-Jen Wu2, Cheng-Yu Long3, Chung-Han Ho4, Kuan-Hui Huang5, Chin-Chen Chu6, Cheng-Yang Chou7. 1. Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Reconstruction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chi Mei Foundation Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan; Center of General Education, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chia-Yi Medical Center, Chiayi, Taiwan. 3. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 4. Division of Gynecology, Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical Center, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 6. Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Foundation Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan. 7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. Electronic address: chougyn@mail.ncku.edu.tw.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Using a population-based nationwide database, we describe the changing surgical trends for laparoscopy or laparotomy for benign ovarian tumors among hospitals of different accreditation levels in Taiwan (medical centers, regional hospitals, and local hospitals). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women who had National Health Insurance and received either laparoscopy or laparotomy as the primary surgery for benign ovarian tumors in Taiwan during 1999-2009 were identified for analysis. RESULTS: In total, 135,793 women who received either laparotomic (39,779) or laparoscopic surgery (96,014) for benign ovarian pathology were identified. The increase in annual laparoscopy number from 7176 in 1999 to 11,046 in 2009 was significant according to a log-linear regression test (p < 0.0001). The decrease in laparotomies from 3845 to 3567 was not significant (p = 0.190). Service volume shifts from local hospitals to regional hospitals were noted, with a concomitant decrease in the numbers of local hospitals. Laparoscopy was used more often than laparotomy among all three hospital accreditation levels. An increasing trend for choosing laparoscopy was observed for medical centers and local hospitals (p < 0.0001), but not regional hospitals (p = 0.0745). Laparoscopy was used more often in younger patients, by younger surgeons, and by male surgeons among hospitals at all three accreditation levels. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy was preferentially used over laparotomy at all three hospital levels. An increasing trend for choosing laparoscopy was observed for medical centers and local hospitals, but not regional hospitals. Service volume shifts from local hospitals to regional hospitals were noted. Use of laparoscopy differed according to patient age, surgeon age, and surgeon gender among different hospital levels.
OBJECTIVE: Using a population-based nationwide database, we describe the changing surgical trends for laparoscopy or laparotomy for benign ovarian tumors among hospitals of different accreditation levels in Taiwan (medical centers, regional hospitals, and local hospitals). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Women who had National Health Insurance and received either laparoscopy or laparotomy as the primary surgery for benign ovarian tumors in Taiwan during 1999-2009 were identified for analysis. RESULTS: In total, 135,793 women who received either laparotomic (39,779) or laparoscopic surgery (96,014) for benign ovarian pathology were identified. The increase in annual laparoscopy number from 7176 in 1999 to 11,046 in 2009 was significant according to a log-linear regression test (p < 0.0001). The decrease in laparotomies from 3845 to 3567 was not significant (p = 0.190). Service volume shifts from local hospitals to regional hospitals were noted, with a concomitant decrease in the numbers of local hospitals. Laparoscopy was used more often than laparotomy among all three hospital accreditation levels. An increasing trend for choosing laparoscopy was observed for medical centers and local hospitals (p < 0.0001), but not regional hospitals (p = 0.0745). Laparoscopy was used more often in younger patients, by younger surgeons, and by male surgeons among hospitals at all three accreditation levels. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy was preferentially used over laparotomy at all three hospital levels. An increasing trend for choosing laparoscopy was observed for medical centers and local hospitals, but not regional hospitals. Service volume shifts from local hospitals to regional hospitals were noted. Use of laparoscopy differed according to patient age, surgeon age, and surgeon gender among different hospital levels.