Kevin D Coleman 1 , Chad W Schmiedt , Kristin A Kirkby , Amanda E Coleman , Sheilah A Robertson , Jon Hash , B Duncan X Lascelles . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To perform algometric readings in normal dogs in a design that would assess possible confounding factors. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. ANIMALS: Skeletally mature spayed female, intact male and castrated male retriever or retriever mix dogs without orthopedic or neurologic disease (n = 19). METHODS: Twelve common surgical sites were selected for algometric pressure testing. Threshold response was defined as a conscious recognition of the stimulus, and recorded in Newtons. Sites were tested in the same order, and the testing sequence repeated 3 times on each side of the dog. Dogs were tested in the morning and evening of the same day and was repeated 10-14 days later, allowing 4 separate data collections for each dog. RESULTS: Data were analyzed using ANOVA or ANCOVA. When all the data were included in the analysis, dog (P < .0001), order (P < .0001), site (P < .0001), site order (P = .0217), time (P < .0001), day (P < .0001) and repetition (P < .0001) all significantly affected the algometer readings. When only the first reading for each site was included in the analysis, dog (P < .0001), site (P < .0001) and sex (P < .0001) all significantly affected algometer readings. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that learning occurred over repeated collection time points, with dogs anticipating the stimulus and reacting at lower thresholds. © Copyright 2014 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.
OBJECTIVE: To perform algometric readings in normal dogs in a design that would assess possible confounding factors. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. ANIMALS: Skeletally mature spayed female, intact male and castrated male retriever or retriever mix dogs without orthopedic or neurologic disease (n = 19). METHODS: Twelve common surgical sites were selected for algometric pressure testing. Threshold response was defined as a conscious recognition of the stimulus, and recorded in Newtons. Sites were tested in the same order, and the testing sequence repeated 3 times on each side of the dog . Dogs were tested in the morning and evening of the same day and was repeated 10-14 days later, allowing 4 separate data collections for each dog . RESULTS: Data were analyzed using ANOVA or ANCOVA. When all the data were included in the analysis, dog (P < .0001), order (P < .0001), site (P < .0001), site order (P = .0217), time (P < .0001), day (P < .0001) and repetition (P < .0001) all significantly affected the algometer readings. When only the first reading for each site was included in the analysis, dog (P < .0001), site (P < .0001) and sex (P < .0001) all significantly affected algometer readings. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that learning occurred over repeated collection time points, with dogs anticipating the stimulus and reacting at lower thresholds. © Copyright 2014 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.
Entities: Disease
Species
Mesh: See more »
Year: 2014
PMID: 24410982 DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12112.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Surg ISSN: 0161-3499 Impact factor: 1.495