| Literature DB >> 24410919 |
Nadja Kokalj Vokač1, Bogdan Cizmarević, Andreja Zagorac, Boris Zagradišnik, Boštjan Lanišnik.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) are among the most common cancers. The poor survival rate among oral cancer patients can be attributed to several factors, one of them being lack of early detection. A key approach to this problem would be to detect potentially malignant lesion at their early stage. Using the FISH technique, oral brush cytology slides can be an easy and rapid screening approach for malignant cell detection. The present study was designed to detect hTERC and SOX2 amplifications in OSSC exfoliative tumor cells and evaluate whether those two gene amplifications might serve as a supportive biomarker in early detection and diagnosis of oral and oropharyngeal SCC.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24410919 PMCID: PMC3900261 DOI: 10.1186/1755-8166-7-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cytogenet ISSN: 1755-8166 Impact factor: 2.009
Clinical data of patients with OSCC
| Women | 17 (0.24) | 57 (48–76) years | 16 (3–27) months | |||
| Men | 54 (0.76) | 58 (36–84) years | 14 (3–24) months | |||
| Deceased | 10 (0.14) | | | | | |
| Current status unknown | 14 (0.2) | | | | | |
| | | | | | ||
| Hypopharinx | 5 (0.07) | | | | | |
| Larynx | 2 (0.03) | | | | | |
| Lips | 1 (0.01) | | | | | |
| Mouth: | 36 (0.51) | | | | | |
| Tongue | 14 (0.20) | | | | | |
| Floor of the mouth | 13 (0.18) | | | | | |
| Retromolar trigone | 3 (0.04) | | | | | |
| Lower alveolus | 3 (0.04) | | | | | |
| Buccal mucosa | 2 (0.03) | | | | | |
| Upper alveolus | 1 (0.01) | | | | | |
| Oropharynx | 27 (0.38) | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | ||||||
| Tis | 1 (0.01) | N0 | 27 (0.38) | M0 | 69 (0.97) | |
| T1 | 5 (0.07) | N1 or higher | 44 (0.62) | M1 | 2 (0.03) | |
| T2 | 20 (0.28) | | | | | |
| T3 | 11 (0.25) | | | | | |
| T4 | 34 (0.48) | | | | | |
| | | | ||||
| 0 | 1 (0.01) | | Carcinoma in situ | | 2 (0.03) | |
| I | 4 (0.06) | | Grade 1 | | 12 (0.17) | |
| II | 11 (0.15) | | Grade 2 | | 45 (0.63) | |
| III | 7 (0.10) | | Grade 3 | | 12 (0.17) | |
| IVA | 35 (0.49) | | | | | |
| IVB | 11 (0.15) | | | | | |
| IVC | 2 (0.03) | |||||
Figure 1Different level SOX2 (a, b, c, d) and TERC gene (e, f, g, h) amplifications was shown in representative cells. The FISH pattern CEP3 : SOX2 was 2 : >4 (a). Masive amplifications of SOX2 gene (b). Polyploidies and amplifications of SOX2 gene (c). Polyploidies of S0X2 gene in pattern 9:9. Polyploidies and amplifications of TERC gene (e, f). Polyploidies of TERC gene (g, h). Patches of amplifications of TERC gene in polyploid cell pointed by arrow (g).
FISH analysis of TERC/SOX2 loci vs. centromere 3 in OSCC patients according to the clinical characterization
| Controls | 21 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 46.77 (5.91-370) 0.00 | N/D2 (N/D2) 0.00 | 21.00 (2.56-455) 0.00 |
| OSCC | 22 | 27 | 22 | 49 | |||
| Stage: I, II, III | 8 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 1.29 (0.39 – 4.23), 0.78 | 1.25 (0.41-6.03) 0.76 | 1.00 (0.25-4.07) 1.00 |
| Stage: IV | 14 | 20 | 14 | 34 | |||
| Stage: I, II | 4 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 0.69 (0.17-2.77), 0.76 | 0.98 (0.18-5,13) 1.00 | 0.48 (0.09-2.34) 0.49 |
| Stage: III, IV | 18 | 22 | 15 | 37 | |||
| Oropharynx | 6 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 2.00 (0.59-6.93), 0.29 | 1.83 (0.47-7.46) 0.38 | 2.22 (0.53-9.52) 0.34 |
| Outside oropharynx1 | 16 | 16 | 12 | 28 | |||
1Listed in Table 1.
2Not determined.