Literature DB >> 24410479

In situ sequestration of hydrophobic organic contaminants in sediments under stagnant contact with activated carbon. 2. Mass transfer modeling.

Yongju Choi1, Yeo-Myoung Cho, David Werner, Richard G Luthy.   

Abstract

The validity of a hydrophobic organic contaminant mass transfer model to predict the effectiveness of in situ activated carbon (AC) treatment under stagnant sediment-AC contact is studied for different contaminants and sediments. The modeling results and data from a previous 24-month column experiment of uptake in polyethylene samplers are within a factor of 2 for parent- and alkylated-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in petroleum-impacted sediment and factors of 3-10 for polychlorinated biphenyls. The model successfully reproduces the relative effects of AC-sediment contact time, contaminant properties, AC particle size, AC mixing regime, AC distribution, and hydraulic conditions observed in the sediment column experiments. The model tracks contaminant concentrations in different sediment compartments over time, which provides useful information on the contaminant sequestration by the added AC. Long-term projection of the effectiveness of AC amendment using the model shows that the effects of AC particle size and particle-scale heterogeneity in AC distribution are pronounced within a year or so. However, the effect of those factors becomes less significant after a much longer contact period (on the order of a decade or two), resulting in substantial reduction in pore-water concentrations, for example, greater than 99% for benz[a]anthracene, under various scenarios.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24410479     DOI: 10.1021/es404209v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

1.  Activated carbon as a means of limiting bioaccumulation of organochlorine pesticides, triclosan, triclocarban, and fipronil from sediments rich in organic matter.

Authors:  Viet D Dang; Kevin J Kroll; Samuel D Supowit; Rolf U Halden; Nancy D Denslow
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  Sequestration of HCHs and DDTs in sediments in Dongting Lake of China with multiwalled carbon nanotubes: implication for in situ sequestration.

Authors:  Yanyan Guo; Cui Lai; Guangming Zeng; Jilai Gong; Chang Su; Chunping Yang; Piao Xu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  In situ sediment treatment using activated carbon: a demonstrated sediment cleanup technology.

Authors:  Clayton R Patmont; Upal Ghosh; Paul LaRosa; Charles A Menzie; Richard G Luthy; Marc S Greenberg; Gerard Cornelissen; Espen Eek; John Collins; John Hull; Tore Hjartland; Edward Glaza; John Bleiler; James Quadrini
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 2.992

4.  Evaluation of strategies to minimize ecotoxic side-effects of sorbent-based sediment remediation.

Authors:  Zhantao Han; Sebastian Abel; Jarkko Akkanen; David Werner
Journal:  J Chem Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.174

5.  Sediment Remediation Using Activated Carbon: Effects of Sorbent Particle Size and Resuspension on Sequestration of Metals and Organic Contaminants.

Authors:  Robert Rämö; Stefano Bonaglia; Inna Nybom; Anne Kreutzer; Gesine Witt; Anna Sobek; Jonas S Gunnarsson
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.218

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.