Literature DB >> 24410107

Assessment of early cognitive recovery after surgery using the Post-operative Quality of Recovery Scale.

S Newman1, D J Wilkinson, C F Royse.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive problems early after surgery are often considered transient in nature. Neuropsychological performance and its relation to other recovery parameters have rarely been systematically assessed during this period.
METHODS: A subanalysis of the Post-operative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS) feasibility study included patients who completed the PQRS on day 3, and were categorised as recovered or not recovered in the cognitive domain using the revised scoring method.
RESULTS: Of the 449 patients included in this paper, 388 (86.4%) recovered in the cognitive domain and 61 (13.6%) had not recovered at 3 days. Cognitive recovery in the early post-operative time points up to day 1 was significantly lower in patients who had not recovered at day 3 (P < 0.001). Of those not recovered on day 3, 59.1% had recovered on day 1, but lapsed to non-recovery on day 3. The non-recovered group demonstrated less recovery in the physiological (P = 0.019), activity of daily living (P = 0.049) and nociceptive (P = 0.033) domains, but no difference was found in the emotive domain. The non-recovered group had a higher incidence of major surgery (P = 0.021), a higher proportion of patients with difficulty eating (4.9% vs. 0.5%, P = 0.002 and a clinically unimportant but lower temperature (36.6° vs. 36.4°C, P = 0.010).
CONCLUSION: Failure of cognitive recovery is reasonably common 3 days after surgery, can fluctuate and is associated with poorer early recovery in the activities of daily living, nociceptive and physiological domains.
© 2013 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24410107     DOI: 10.1111/aas.12234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  5 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine.

Authors:  Siny Tsang; Colin F Royse; Abdullah Sulieman Terkawi
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2017-05

2.  Development and validation of Arabic version of the postoperative quality of recovery scale.

Authors:  Abdullah Sulieman Terkawi; Siny Tsang; Waleed Riad; Sumaya Nemer Nassar; Maissa Mahmoud; Ghadah Jumaan AlKahtani; Hanin Hussain Alsharif; Khalid S Doais; Fatima Jaina Sala; Anas Abdulrahman; Colin F Royse
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2017-05

3.  Evaluation of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale test and re-test in Swedish among healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Pether Jildenstål; Johan Eriksson; Margareta Warren Stomberg; Jan G Jakobsson
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-10-21

4.  Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the duke activity status index in the hindi language.

Authors:  Nishith Govil; Kumar Parag; Barun Kumar; Hariom Khandelwal; Ruchi Dua; Pudi Sivaji
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep

5.  Deep Neuromuscular Blockade Combined with Low Pneumoperitoneum Pressure for Nociceptive Recovery After Major Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Yu-Qin Long; Xi-Sheng Shan; Xiao-Mei Feng; Hong Liu; Fu-Hai Ji; Ke Peng
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.133

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.