Literature DB >> 24408893

PET/CT imaging and human papilloma virus-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer: evolving clinical imaging paradigm.

Rathan M Subramaniam1, Krishna C Alluri, Abdel K Tahari, Nafi Aygun, Harry Quon.   

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) represents an emerging disease that differs from HPV-negative OPSCC in natural history and prognosis. Contrast-enhanced PET/CT is essential to accurately stage the primary site when there are smaller tumors; neck nodal metastases, which tend to have a more cystic component; and distant metastases that manifest in unusual sites (disseminating phenotype) such as bones and other solid organs, including brain. Metastases tend to appear later in the disease course during follow-up for HPV-positive OPSCC than for HPV-negative OPSCC. Because HPV-positive OPSCC patients have a better clinical outcome, there is a need for treatment deintensification to spare the patient from treatment-related toxicities. (18)F-FDG PET/CT would play a role in monitoring patients with deintensified treatments to ensure that no adverse outcome is introduced. The better prognosis and outcome of HPV-positive OPSCC patients would warrant imaging follow-up that is less intense but continues longer because of the manifestation of distant metastases later in the disease course and at unusual sites. All these clinical paradigms facilitate a definite role for PET/CT imaging in the management of HPV-positive OPSCC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPV; OPSCC; PET/CT; general oncology

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24408893     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.125542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  9 in total

Review 1.  Present and future role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yuko Suenaga; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Imaging modality utilization trends in patients with stage III-IV oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yukako Ichimiya; Krishna Alluri; Charles Marcus; Simon Best; Christine H Chung; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-01-15

3.  Post-treatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced CT in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparative effectiveness study.

Authors:  Mehdi Taghipour; Esther Mena; Matthew J Kruse; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.690

4.  Imaging at diagnosis impacts cancer-specific survival among patients with cancer of the oropharynx.

Authors:  Rustain L Morgan; Megan M Eguchi; Adam C Mueller; Stacie L Daugherty; Arya Amini; Sana D Karam
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Transcervical sonography and human papillomavirus 16 E6 antibodies are sensitive for the detection of oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Krystle A Lang Kuhs; C Burton Wood; Jamie Wiggleton; Joseph M Aulino; Brian Latimer; Derek K Smith; Noemi Bender; Sarah Rohde; Kyle Mannion; Young Kim; Robert Sinard; Alexander Langerman; Arthur Fleischer; Carole Fakhry; Tim Waterboer; James L Netterville
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Do 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in oropharyngeal and oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas indicate HPV status?

Authors:  Ayse Tuba Karagulle Kendi; Kelly Magliocca; Amanda Corey; Dana C Nickleach; James Galt; Kristin Higgins; Jonathan J Beitler; Mark W El-Deiry; J Trad Wadsworth; Patricia A Hudgins; Nabil F Saba; David M Schuster
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.794

Review 7.  Advances in Imaging for HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer: Applications to Radiation Oncology.

Authors:  Travis C Salzillo; Nicolette Taku; Kareem A Wahid; Brigid A McDonald; Jarey Wang; Lisanne V van Dijk; Jillian M Rigert; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Jihong Wang; Stephen Y Lai; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 5.421

8.  Positive Predictive Value of Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System Categories 3 and 4 Posttreatment FDG-PET/CT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  P Wangaryattawanich; B F Branstetter; J D Ly; U Duvvuri; D E Heron; T J Rath
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  Follow-up in Head and Neck Cancer: Do More Does It Mean Do Better? A Systematic Review and Our Proposal Based on Our Experience.

Authors:  Nerina Denaro; Marco Carlo Merlano; Elvio Grazioso Russi
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 3.372

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.