Literature DB >> 24408447

On the relationship between the quantum yield of Photosystem II electron transport, as determined by chlorophyll fluorescence and the quantum yield of CO2-dependent O 2 evolution.

G Oquist1, W S Chow.   

Abstract

We tested the two empirical models of the relationship between chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis, previously published by Weis E and Berry JA 1987 (Biochim Biophys Acta 894: 198-208) and Genty B et al. 1989 (Biochim Biophys Acta 990: 87-92). These were applied to data from different species representing different states of light acclimation, to species with C3 or C4 photosynthesis, and to wild-type and a chlorophyll b-less chlorina mutant of barley. Photosynthesis measured as CO2-saturated O2 evolution and modulated fluorescence were simultaneously monitored over a range of photon flux densities. The quantum yields of O2 evolution (ØO2) were based on absorbed photons, and the fluorescence parameters for photochemical (qp) and non-photochemical (qN) quenching, as well as the ratio of variable fluorescence to maximum fluorescence during steady-state illumination (F'v/F'm), were determined. In accordance with the Weis and Berry model, most plants studied exhibited an approximately linear relationship between ØO2/qp (i.e., the yield of O2 evolution by open Photosystem II reaction centres) and qN, except for wild-type barley that showed a non-linear relationship. In contrast to the linear relationship reported by Genty et al. for qp×F'v/F'm (i.e., the quantum yield of Photosystem II electron transport) and ØCO2, we found a non-linear relationship between qp×F'v/F'm and ØO2 for all plants, except for the chlorina mutant of barley, which showed a largely linear relationship. The curvilinearity of wild-type barley deviated somewhat from that of other species tested. The non-linear part of the relationship was confined to low, limiting photon flux densities, whereas at higher light levels the relationship was linear. Photoinhibition did not change the overall shape of the relationship between qp×F'v/F'm and ØO2 except that the maximum values of the quantum yields of Photosystem II electron transport and photosynthetic O2 evolution decreased in proportion to the degree of photoinhibition. This implies that the quantum yield of Photosystem II electron transport under high light conditions may be similar for photoinhibited and non-inhibited plants. Based on our experimental results and theoretical analyses of photochemical and non-photochemical fluoresce quenching processes, we conclude that both models, although not universal for all plants, provide useful means for the prediction of photosynthesis from fluorescence parameters. However, we also discuss that conditions which alter one or more of the rate constants that determine the various fluorescence parameters, as well as differential light penetration in assays for oxygen evolution and fluorescence emission, may have direct effect on the relationships of the two models.

Entities:  

Year:  1992        PMID: 24408447     DOI: 10.1007/BF00032982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photosynth Res        ISSN: 0166-8595            Impact factor:   3.573


  14 in total

1.  The relationship between non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence and the rate of photosystem 2 photochemistry in leaves.

Authors:  B Genty; J Harbinson; J M Briantais; N R Baker
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Continuous recording of photochemical and non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching with a new type of modulation fluorometer.

Authors:  U Schreiber; U Schliwa; W Bilger
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Energy-dependent quenching of dark-level chlorophyll fluorescence in intact leaves.

Authors:  W Bilger; U Schreiber
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  A theoretical and experimental analysis of the qP and q N coefficients of chlorophyll fluorescence quenching and their relation to photochemical and nonphotochemical events.

Authors:  M Havaux; R J Strasser; H Greppin
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Studies on a barley mutant lacking chlorophyll b. I. Photochemical activity of isolated chloroplasts.

Authors:  N K Boardman; H R Highkin
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1966-10-10

6.  Studies on a barley mutant lacking chlorophyll b. II. Fluorescence properties of isolated chloroplasts.

Authors:  N K Boardman; S W Thorne
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1968-02-12

7.  Kok effect and the quantum yield of photosynthesis : light partially inhibits dark respiration.

Authors:  R E Sharp; M A Matthews; J S Boyer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Simultaneous measurement of oscillations in oxygen evolution and chlorophyll a fluorescence in leaf pieces.

Authors:  D A Walker; M N Sivak; R T Prinsley; J K Cheesbrough
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Studies on the Mechanism of Photoinhibition in Higher Plants: I. EFFECTS OF HIGH LIGHT INTENSITY ON CHLOROPLAST ACTIVITIES IN CUCUMBER ADAPTED TO LOW LIGHT.

Authors:  C Critchley
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Photoinhibition of photosynthesis represents a mechanism for the long-term regulation of photosystem II.

Authors:  G Oquist; W S Chow; J M Anderson
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.116

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Quantifying and monitoring functional photosystem II and the stoichiometry of the two photosystems in leaf segments: approaches and approximations.

Authors:  Wah Soon Chow; Da-Yong Fan; Riichi Oguchi; Husen Jia; Pasquale Losciale; Youn-Il Park; Jie He; Gunnar Oquist; Yun-Gang Shen; Jan M Anderson
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Exposure to ultraviolet radiation delays photosynthetic recovery in Arctic kelp zoospores.

Authors:  Michael Y Roleda; Dieter Hanelt; Christian Wiencke
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  An Analysis of the Mechanism of the Low-wave Phenomenon of Chlorophyll Fluorescence.

Authors:  Michito Tsuyama; Masaru Shibata; Tetsu Kawazu; Yoshichika Kobayashi
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Light dependence of quantum yields of Photosystem II and CO2 fixation in C 3 and C 4 plants.

Authors:  W Oberhuber; Z Y Dai; G E Edwards
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  An in situ study of photosynthetic oxygen exchange and electron transport rate in the marine macroalga Ulva lactuca (Chlorophyta).

Authors:  Ben J Longstaff; Tim Kildea; John W Runcie; Anthony Cheshire; William C Dennison; Catriona Hurd; Todd Kana; John A Raven; Anthony W D Larkum
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  On the relationship between chlorophyll fluorescence quenching and the quantum yield of electron transport in isolated thylakoids.

Authors:  H Hormann; C Neubauer; U Schreiber
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Can CO2 assimilation in maize leaves be predicted accurately from chlorophyll fluorescence analysis?

Authors:  G E Edwards; N R Baker
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Oxygen Requirement and Inhibition of C4 Photosynthesis. An analysis of c4 plants deficient in the c3 and c4 cycles An Analysis of C4 Plants Deficient in the C3 and C4 Cycles

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Chlorophyll fluorescence at 680 and 730 nm and leaf photosynthesis.

Authors:  R B Peterson; V Oja; A Laisk
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 10.  Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis of cyanobacterial photosynthesis and acclimation.

Authors:  D Campbell; V Hurry; A K Clarke; P Gustafsson; G Oquist
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.