Literature DB >> 24408169

Auditory processing in children with dyslexia: electrophysiological and behavior evaluation.

Juliana Casseb Oliveira, Cristina Ferraz Borges Murphy, Eliane Schochat.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the performances of children with dyslexia and a control group in behavioral tests of (Central) Auditory Processing and Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (P300).
METHODS: Participants were 22 individuals with dyslexia (study group) and 16 individuals with typical development (control group). All individuals underwent behavioral and electrophysiological assessment of (Central) Auditory Processing (Frequency Pattern Test, Dichotic Digit Test, Speech-in-Noise Test, and P300).
RESULTS: Concerning the behavioral tests, there was difference between groups for the Frequency Pattern Test and for the left ear in the Dichotic Digit Test, with worse performance observed in the study group. Considering the P300, there was difference between groups regarding amplitude and latency absolute values, but this finding was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that individuals with dyslexia present temporal auditory processing and figure-ground alterations, which was evidenced by behavioral auditory processing tests. There was no difference between the performance of both groups for the P300 test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24408169     DOI: 10.1590/s2317-17822013000100008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Codas        ISSN: 2317-1782


  5 in total

1.  Post-Attentive Integration and Topographic Map Distribution During Audiovisual Processing in Dyslexia: A P300 Event-Related Component Analysis.

Authors:  Siti Atiyah Ali; Tahamina Begum; Mohammed Faruque Reza; Nor Asyikin Fadzil; Faiz Mustafar
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2020-08-19

2.  Auditory evoked potential: a proposal for further evaluation in children with learning disabilities.

Authors:  Ana C F Frizzo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-10

3.  Impact of Educational Level on Performance on Auditory Processing Tests.

Authors:  Cristina F B Murphy; Camila M Rabelo; Marcela L Silagi; Letícia L Mansur; Eliane Schochat
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Questionnaires and checklists for central auditory processing screening used in Brazil: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francielli Loss Volpatto; Inaê Costa Rechia; Alexandre Hundertmarck Lessa; Cristina Loureiro Chaves Soldera; Maria Inês Dornelles da Costa Ferreira; Márcia Salgado Machado
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-21

5.  Procedures for central auditory processing screening in schoolchildren.

Authors:  Nádia Giulian de Carvalho; Thalita Ubiali; Maria Isabel Ramos do Amaral; Maria Francisca Colella-Santos
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.