Literature DB >> 2440794

Quantitation of lymphocytes in endomyocardial biopsies: use and limitations of antibodies to leukocyte common antigen.

S J Schnitt, P S Ciano, F J Schoen.   

Abstract

The difficulty in distinguishing lymphocytes from other cells in the myocardial interstitium on hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections has contributed to the variable incidence of myocarditis diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy. We investigated the value of immunoperoxidase staining using antibodies to leukocyte common antigen (LCA) for identifying interstitial mononuclear cells in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, endomyocardial biopsy samples of the right ventricle obtained by bioptome from 50 consecutive autopsies. In 42 cases with nonspecific findings or no disease, two observers independently quantitated interstitial lymphocytes on hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections and LCA-positive cells on immunoperoxidase sections. Mean values for lymphocytes on hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections were significantly different for the two observers (5.8/mm2 vs. 8.9/mm2, P less than 0.001). In contrast, mean values for LCA-positive cells on immunoperoxidase sections were similar (13.8/mm2 vs. 15.1/mm2, P = not significant). Interobserver concordance was excellent for LCA-immunoperoxidase sections (r = 0.83), exceeding that obtained for hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections (r = 0.63). Intraobserver correlations between lymphocytes identified on hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections and LCA-positive cells on immunoperoxidase sections were poor (r = 0.28 and 0.14). LCA-immunoreactive cells included, in addition to lymphocytes, mast cells and histiocytes. We conclude that there is considerable interobserver discordance in identifying lymphocytes on hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections of endomyocardial biopsy samples. While LCA-immunoperoxidase staining reduces interobserver variability, results must be interpreted with caution since this antibody stains other leukocytes in addition to lymphocytes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2440794     DOI: 10.1016/s0046-8177(87)80053-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  6 in total

1.  Foreword to special issue on "Myocarditis".

Authors:  Alida L P Caforio
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Active versus borderline myocarditis: clinicopathological correlates and prognostic implications.

Authors:  A Angelini; M Crosato; G M Boffa; F Calabrese; V Calzolari; R Chioin; L Daliento; G Thiene
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Myocarditis mimicking acute myocardial infarction: role of endomyocardial biopsy in the differential diagnosis.

Authors:  A Angelini; V Calzolari; F Calabrese; G M Boffa; F Maddalena; R Chioin; G Thiene
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Classification and histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular diagnosis of inflammatory myocardial disease.

Authors:  Cristina Basso; Fiorella Calabrese; Annalisa Angelini; Elisa Carturan; Gaetano Thiene
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 5.  The spectrum of myocarditis: from pathology to the clinics.

Authors:  Ornella Leone; Maurizio Pieroni; Claudio Rapezzi; Iacopo Olivotto
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.535

6.  Atrial inflammation in different atrial fibrillation subtypes and its relation with clinical risk factors.

Authors:  Linghe Wu; R W Emmens; J van Wezenbeek; W Stooker; C P Allaart; A B A Vonk; A C van Rossum; H W M Niessen; P A J Krijnen
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 5.460

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.