Sung Il Jung1, Hee Sun Park, Young Jun Kim, Hae Jeong Jeon. 1. Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 4-12 Hwayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 143-729, Korea, radsijung@kuh.ac.kr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate effect of tumor size and contour type for the detection of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on unenhanced CT. METHODS: This retrospective institutional review board approved study that includes 111 patients with RCC and 100 patients without RCC who underwent unenhanced CT. Two readers performed a blinded and independent review of the presence of RCC on unenhanced CT. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) was compared by tumor size (<3 cm: small, or ≥3 cm: large) and contour type (endophytic, mesophytic, or exophytic). RESULTS: For tumor size, the AUC for small RCC (0.70 and 0.78, for reader 1 and reader 2) was significantly lower than that for large RCC (0.97 and 0.99, for reader 1 and reader 2) (p < 0.001). As for contour type of tumor, the AUC for endophytic RCC (0.60 and 0.71, for reader 1 and reader 2) was significantly lower than that for mesophytic RCC (0.95 and 0.98, for reader 1 and reader 2) and exophytic RCC (0.98 and 0.99, reader 1 and reader 2) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: On unenhanced CT, tumor size and contour type can affect the detection of RCC. While most large or exophytic RCC can be easily detected, the detection of small and endophytic RCC is highly limited.
PURPOSE: To evaluate effect of tumor size and contour type for the detection of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on unenhanced CT. METHODS: This retrospective institutional review board approved study that includes 111 patients with RCC and 100 patients without RCC who underwent unenhanced CT. Two readers performed a blinded and independent review of the presence of RCC on unenhanced CT. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) was compared by tumor size (<3 cm: small, or ≥3 cm: large) and contour type (endophytic, mesophytic, or exophytic). RESULTS: For tumor size, the AUC for small RCC (0.70 and 0.78, for reader 1 and reader 2) was significantly lower than that for large RCC (0.97 and 0.99, for reader 1 and reader 2) (p < 0.001). As for contour type of tumor, the AUC for endophytic RCC (0.60 and 0.71, for reader 1 and reader 2) was significantly lower than that for mesophytic RCC (0.95 and 0.98, for reader 1 and reader 2) and exophytic RCC (0.98 and 0.99, reader 1 and reader 2) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: On unenhanced CT, tumor size and contour type can affect the detection of RCC. While most large or exophytic RCC can be easily detected, the detection of small and endophytic RCC is highly limited.