Literature DB >> 24407170

Correlated responses in growth and body composition of replicated single-trait and index selected lines of mice.

E J Eisen1, T Bandy.   

Abstract

Correlated responses in growth, body composition and efficiency were evaluated in lines of mice selected in the following ways: W(+)T i (o) , increased six-week body weight (WT6); W ° T i (+) , increased six-week tail length (TL6); W(+)T i (-) , increased WT6 and decreased TL6; W(-)T i (+) , decreased WT6 and increased TL6; M16, increased three-to six-week postweaning gain (PWG). Each of the first four selection treatments had two replicate lines (i = 1, 2) selected for 13 generations and the fifth treatment had one line selected for 30 generations. All lines were derived from a randombred ICR albino population which served as a control. Additional traits studied were three-week body weight and tail length, postweaning gain in tail length, percent body composition (ash, fat, moisture and protein) at six weeks of age, and three-to six-week feed consumption (CONS) and efficiency (EFF = PWG/CONS). Efficiency of body constituent gains (ash, fat, protein and caloric value) were determined by dividing each constituent by CONS. Relative to selection treatments, replicate variation in the array of traits was small and was primarily attributable to the effects of genetic drift; more frequent significant replicate differences among traits in W(+)T(-) were associated with a replicate difference in cumulative selection differentials. Selection for different criteria involving WT6 and TL6 did not change the allometric relationship between tail length and body weight in the three-to six-week age interval. The significant divergence between W(+)T ° and W °T(+) and between W(+)T(-) and W(-)T(+) was as expected for WT6 and TL6. Significant asymmetry of selection response between W(+)T(-) and W(-)T(+) for WT6 and TL6 was attributed to maternal effects. In agreement with theory, antagonistic index selection generally yielded smaller genetic responses than single trait selection. Positive correlated responses in CONS and EFF were found for M16 and W(+)T °. Significant correlated changes in CONS (positive in W °T(+) and negative in W(-)T(+)) were not accompanied by a significant change in EFF. In contrast, W(+)T(-) evinced an increased EFF and no change in CONS. Percent fat increased significantly in W(+)T ° and M16. For W(+)T(o), W(+)T(-) and M16, an increased energetic, fat and ash efficiency was observed, whereas M16 exhibited a positive increment in protein efficiency as well. Among selection treatment means, there were high positive correlations between WT6 and fat weight, protein weight, percent fat, CONS and EFF and a high negative correlation between WT6 and percent protein.

Entities:  

Year:  1977        PMID: 24407170     DOI: 10.1007/BF00281711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  15 in total

1.  Population size and selection intensity effects on long-term selection response in mice.

Authors:  E J Eisen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Effects of early pregnancy in growth, body composition and efficiency in mice.

Authors:  E J Eisen; J M Leatherwood
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Correlated response in skeletal traits and replicate variation in selected lines of mice.

Authors:  J J Rutledge; E J Eisen; J E Legates
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Genetic drift and inbreeding depression measured from control populations of mice.

Authors:  E J Eisen; J P Hanrahan
Journal:  Can J Genet Cytol       Date:  1974-03

5.  Selection for growth rate, feed efficiency and body composition in mice.

Authors:  T M Sutherland; P E Biondini; G M Ward
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Replicated selection for body weight in mice.

Authors:  D S Falconer
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  An experimental evaluation of genetic correlation.

Authors:  J J Rutledge; E J Eisen; J E Legates
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Dynamics of genetic and maternal effects in mice.

Authors:  J J Rutledge; O W Robison; E J Eisen; J E Legates
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Maternal effects among lines of mice selected for body weight.

Authors:  J M White; J E Legates; E J Eisen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Comparison of growth curves of mice selected and unselected for postweaning gain.

Authors:  V M Timon; E J Eisen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 5.699

View more
  2 in total

1.  Body composition and energetic efficiency in two lines of mice selected for rapid growth rate and their F1 crosses.

Authors:  E J Eisen; H Bakker; J Nagai
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  A multi-megabase copy number gain causes maternal transmission ratio distortion on mouse chromosome 2.

Authors:  John P Didion; Andrew P Morgan; Amelia M-F Clayshulte; Rachel C Mcmullan; Liran Yadgary; Petko M Petkov; Timothy A Bell; Daniel M Gatti; James J Crowley; Kunjie Hua; David L Aylor; Ling Bai; Mark Calaway; Elissa J Chesler; John E French; Thomas R Geiger; Terry J Gooch; Theodore Garland; Alison H Harrill; Kent Hunter; Leonard McMillan; Matt Holt; Darla R Miller; Deborah A O'Brien; Kenneth Paigen; Wenqi Pan; Lucy B Rowe; Ginger D Shaw; Petr Simecek; Patrick F Sullivan; Karen L Svenson; George M Weinstock; David W Threadgill; Daniel Pomp; Gary A Churchill; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 5.917

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.