Literature DB >> 24407040

High variability in serum estradiol measurements in men and women.

Hubert W Vesper1, Julianne C Botelho2, Meghan L Vidal2, Yasamin Rahmani2, Linda M Thienpont3, Samuel P Caudill2.   

Abstract

To reduce the variability in estradiol (E2) testing and to assure better patient care, standardization of E2 measurements has been recommended. This study aims to assess the accuracy and variability of E2 measurements performed by 11 routine immunological methods and 6 mass spectrometry methods using single donor serum materials and to compare the results to a reference method. The contribution of calibration bias, specificity or matrix effects, and imprecision on the overall variability of individual assays was evaluated. This study showed substantial variability in serum E2 measurements in samples from men and pre- and post-menopausal women. The mean bias across all samples, for each participant, ranged between -2.4% and 235%, with 3 participants having a mean bias of over 100%. The data suggest that calibration bias is the major contributor to the overall variability for nine assays. The analytical performances of most assays measuring E2 concentrations do not meet current needs in research and patient care. Three out of 17 assays would meet performance criteria derived from biological variability of ±12.5% bias at concentrations ≥20 pg/mL, and a maximum allowable bias of ±2.5 pg/mL at concentrations <20 pg/mL. The sensitivity differs highly between assays. Most assays are not able to measure E2 levels below 10 pg/mL. Standardization, specifically calibration to a common standard by using panels of individual patient samples, can reduce the observed variability and improve the utility of E2 levels in clinical settings. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical variability; Assay comparison; Estradiol

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24407040      PMCID: PMC5699465          DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2013.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Steroids        ISSN: 0039-128X            Impact factor:   2.668


  25 in total

1.  Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress.

Authors:  C Ricós; V Alvarez; F Cava; J V García-Lario; A Hernández; C V Jiménez; J Minchinela; C Perich; M Simón
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.713

2.  Performance characteristics of eight estradiol immunoassays.

Authors:  David T Yang; William E Owen; Carol S Ramsay; Hui Xie; William L Roberts
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Meeting Report: First and Second Estradiol International Workshops.

Authors:  L Thienpont
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Prospective study of endogenous circulating estradiol and risk of stroke in older women.

Authors:  Jennifer S Lee; Kristine Yaffe; Li-Yung Lui; Jane Cauley; Brent Taylor; Warren Browner; Steven Cummings
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2010-02

5.  Endogenous hormones and coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Alan A Arslan; Oktawia Wojcik; Paolo Toniolo; Roy E Shore; Mortimer Levitz; Karen L Koenig
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 5.162

6.  Endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of nine prospective studies.

Authors:  T Key; P Appleby; I Barnes; G Reeves
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-04-17       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Endogenous estrogen, androgen, and progesterone concentrations and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Stacey A Missmer; A Heather Eliassen; Robert L Barbieri; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  EMAS position statement: Managing women with premature ovarian failure.

Authors:  Svetlana Vujovic; Marc Brincat; Tamer Erel; Marco Gambacciani; Irene Lambrinoudaki; Mette H Moen; Karin Schenck-Gustafsson; Florence Tremollieres; Serge Rozenberg; Margaret Rees
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Challenges to the measurement of estradiol: an endocrine society position statement.

Authors:  William Rosner; Susan E Hankinson; Patrick M Sluss; Hubert W Vesper; Margaret E Wierman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Deficiencies in immunoassay methods used to monitor serum Estradiol levels during aromatase inhibitor treatment in postmenopausal breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Jenny Jaque; Heather Macdonald; Doerthe Brueggmann; Sherfaraz K Patel; Colleen Azen; Nigel Clarke; Frank Z Stanczyk
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-01-11
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiologic studies of estrogen metabolism and breast cancer.

Authors:  Regina G Ziegler; Barbara J Fuhrman; Steven C Moore; Charles E Matthews
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.668

2.  Relative hyperestrogenism in Klinefelter Syndrome: results from a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniele Santi; Sara De Vincentis; Sara Scaltriti; Vincenzo Rochira
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Ultrasensitive quantification of serum estrogens in postmenopausal women and older men by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Qingqing Wang; Kannan Rangiah; Clementina Mesaros; Nathaniel W Snyder; Anil Vachani; Haifeng Song; Ian A Blair
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.668

4.  Simultaneous measurement of total estradiol and testosterone in human serum by isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Hui Zhou; Yuesong Wang; Matthew Gatcombe; Jacob Farris; Julianne C Botelho; Samuel P Caudill; Hubert W Vesper
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  Evaluation of an Isotope Dilution HPLC Tandem Mass Spectrometry Candidate Reference Measurement Procedure for Total 17-β Estradiol in Human Serum.

Authors:  Julianne Cook Botelho; Ashley Ribera; Hans C Cooper; Hubert W Vesper
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Oral estrogen leads to falsely low concentrations of estradiol in a common immunoassay.

Authors:  Lauren R Cirrincione; Bridgit O Crews; Jane A Dickerson; Matthew D Krasowski; Jessica Rongitsch; Katherine L Imborek; Zil Goldstein; Dina N Greene
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.335

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.