Literature DB >> 24406866

Morphological subclassification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: etiological, clinicopathological, and molecular features.

Jau-Yu Liau1, Jia-Huei Tsai1, Ray-Hwang Yuan2, Chih-Ning Chang1, Hsin-Jung Lee1, Yung-Ming Jeng1.   

Abstract

On the basis of morphological features, we subclassified 189 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas into two subtypes: bile duct and cholangiolar. The cholangiolar type is composed of cuboidal to low columnar tumor cells that contain scanty cytoplasm. The bile duct type is composed of tall columnar tumor cells arranged in a large glandular pattern. In this study, 77 (41%) tumors were classified as the cholangiolar type and 112 (59%) tumors were classified as the bile duct type. The cholangiolar-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was more frequently associated with viral hepatitis, whereas all but one intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma associated with intrahepatic lithiasis were classified as the bile duct type. Biliary intraepithelial neoplasm or intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct could be identified in 50 bile duct-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (45%), but in only 3 cholangiolar-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (4%). Cholangiolar-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas frequently expressed N-cadherin, whereas bile duct intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas were more likely to express S100P, Trefoil factor 1, and anterior gradient 2. KRAS is mutated in 23 of 98 (23%) bile duct-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and in only 1 of 76 (1%) cholangiolar-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. Cholangiolar-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas had a higher frequency of IDH1 or 2 mutations than did the bile duct-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. The molecular features of the bile duct-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were similar to those of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Patients with the cholangiolar-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma had higher 5-year survival rates than those of patients with the bile duct-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Our results indicated that intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was a heterogeneous tumor. Subclassification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas based on cholangiocytic differentiation divides them into two groups with different etiologies, clinical manifestations, and molecular pathogeneses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24406866     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  55 in total

Review 1.  Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management.

Authors:  Jesus M Banales; Jose J G Marin; Angela Lamarca; Pedro M Rodrigues; Shahid A Khan; Lewis R Roberts; Vincenzo Cardinale; Guido Carpino; Jesper B Andersen; Chiara Braconi; Diego F Calvisi; Maria J Perugorria; Luca Fabris; Luke Boulter; Rocio I R Macias; Eugenio Gaudio; Domenico Alvaro; Sergio A Gradilone; Mario Strazzabosco; Marco Marzioni; Cédric Coulouarn; Laura Fouassier; Chiara Raggi; Pietro Invernizzi; Joachim C Mertens; Anja Moncsek; Sumera Rizvi; Julie Heimbach; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Jordi Bruix; Alejandro Forner; John Bridgewater; Juan W Valle; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  A proposal of imaging classification of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma into ductal and parenchymal types: clinicopathologic significance.

Authors:  Hyungjin Rhee; Myeong-Jin Kim; Young Nyun Park; Chansik An
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Apical membrane expression of distinct sulfated glycans represents a novel marker of cholangiolocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hitomi Hoshino; Makoto Ohta; Makoto Ito; Kenji Uchimura; Yasuhiro Sakai; Takeshi Uehara; Shulin Low; Mana Fukushima; Motohiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.662

4.  Dichotomy in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas based on histologic similarities to hilar cholangiocarcinomas.

Authors:  Masayuki Akita; Kohei Fujikura; Tetsuo Ajiki; Takumi Fukumoto; Kyoko Otani; Takeshi Azuma; Tomoo Itoh; Yonson Ku; Yoh Zen
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Xu-Feng Zhang; Jeffery Chakedis; Fabio Bagante; Eliza W Beal; Yi Lv; Matthew Weiss; Irinel Popescu; Hugo P Marques; Luca Aldrighetti; Shishir K Maithel; Carlo Pulitano; Todd W Bauer; Feng Shen; George A Poultsides; Oliver Soubrane; Guillaume Martel; B Groot Koerkamp; Alfredo Guglielmi; Endo Itaru; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Integrative Genomic Analysis of Cholangiocarcinoma Identifies Distinct IDH-Mutant Molecular Profiles.

Authors:  Farshad Farshidfar; Siyuan Zheng; Marie-Claude Gingras; Yulia Newton; Juliann Shih; A Gordon Robertson; Toshinori Hinoue; Katherine A Hoadley; Ewan A Gibb; Jason Roszik; Kyle R Covington; Chia-Chin Wu; Eve Shinbrot; Nicolas Stransky; Apurva Hegde; Ju Dong Yang; Ed Reznik; Sara Sadeghi; Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu; Akinyemi I Ojesina; Julian M Hess; J Todd Auman; Suhn K Rhie; Reanne Bowlby; Mitesh J Borad; Andrew X Zhu; Josh M Stuart; Chris Sander; Rehan Akbani; Andrew D Cherniack; Vikram Deshpande; Taofic Mounajjed; Wai Chin Foo; Michael S Torbenson; David E Kleiner; Peter W Laird; David A Wheeler; Autumn J McRee; Oliver F Bathe; Jesper B Andersen; Nabeel Bardeesy; Lewis R Roberts; Lawrence N Kwong
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 7.  [Biliary tract cancers : Molecular characterization and identification of novel prognostic markers].

Authors:  B Goeppert
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.011

8.  Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms of the bile ducts: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of 20 cases.

Authors:  Anna Melissa Schlitter; Kee-Taek Jang; Günter Klöppel; Burcu Saka; Seung-Mo Hong; Hyejeong Choi; George Johan Offerhaus; Ralph H Hruban; Yoh Zen; Björn Konukiewitz; Ivonne Regel; Michael Allgäuer; Serdar Balci; Olca Basturk; Michelle D Reid; Irene Esposito; Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Utility of DNA flow cytometry in distinguishing between malignant and benign intrahepatic biliary lesions.

Authors:  Kwun Wah Wen; Peter S Rabinovitch; Dongliang Wang; Aras N Mattis; Linda D Ferrell; Won-Tak Choi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Expert consensus document: Cholangiocarcinoma: current knowledge and future perspectives consensus statement from the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA).

Authors:  Jesus M Banales; Vincenzo Cardinale; Guido Carpino; Marco Marzioni; Jesper B Andersen; Pietro Invernizzi; Guro E Lind; Trine Folseraas; Stuart J Forbes; Laura Fouassier; Andreas Geier; Diego F Calvisi; Joachim C Mertens; Michael Trauner; Antonio Benedetti; Luca Maroni; Javier Vaquero; Rocio I R Macias; Chiara Raggi; Maria J Perugorria; Eugenio Gaudio; Kirsten M Boberg; Jose J G Marin; Domenico Alvaro
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 46.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.