| Literature DB >> 24406634 |
Mohd-Al-Faisal Nordin1, Wan Himratul-Aznita Wan Harun1, Fathilah Abdul Razak1, Md Yusoff Musa2.
Abstract
Candida species have been associated with the emergence of strains resistant to selected antifungal agents. Plant products have been used traditionally as alternative medicine to ease mucosal fungal infections. This study aimed to investigate the effects of Piper betle extract on the growth profile and the ultrastructure of commonly isolated oral candidal cells. The major component of P. betle was identified using liquid chromatography-mass spectrophotometry (LC-MS/MS). Seven ATCC control strains of Candida species were cultured in yeast peptone dextrose broth under four different growth environments: (i) in the absence of P. betle extract; and in the presence of P. betle extract at respective concentrations of (ii) 1 mg⋅mL(-1); (iii) 3 mg⋅mL(-1); and (iv) 6 mg⋅mL(-1). The growth inhibitory responses of the candidal cells were determined based on changes in the specific growth rates (µ). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to observe any ultrastructural alterations in the candida colonies. LC-MS/MS was performed to validate the presence of bioactive compounds in the extract. Following treatment, it was observed that the µ-values of the treated cells were significantly different than those of the untreated cells (P<0.05), indicating the fungistatic properties of the P. betle extract. The candidal population was also reduced from an average of 13.44×10(6) to 1.78×10(6) viable cell counts (CFU)⋅mL(-1). SEM examination exhibited physical damage and considerable morphological alterations of the treated cells. The compound profile from LC-MS/MS indicated the presence of hydroxybenzoic acid, chavibetol and hydroxychavicol in P. betle extract. The effects of P. betle on candida cells could potentiate its antifungal activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24406634 PMCID: PMC3967311 DOI: 10.1038/ijos.2013.97
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Oral Sci ISSN: 1674-2818 Impact factor: 6.344
Figure 1The population of candidal species under treatment with Chlorhexidine was used as a reference. The data are expressed as the mean±standard deviation of three independent experiments performed in triplicate (n=59).
Changes in the specific growth rates (µ) of the seven candidal species that was grown in the absence (untreated) and presence of Piper betle extract
| Specific growth rates ( | Untreated | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 mg⋅mL−1 | 3 mg⋅mL−1 | 6 mg⋅mL−1 | |||
| 0.263±0.011 | 0.152±0.008 | 0.031±0.005 | 0.005±0.005 | ||
| Reduction in | — | 42.21 | 88.21 | 98.10 | |
| 0.251±0.010 | 0.183±0.014 | 0.006±0.004 | 0.004±0.003 | ||
| Reduction in | — | 27.09 | 97.61 | 98.41 | |
| 0.263±0.004 | 0.174±0.008 | 0.099±0.012 | 0.011±0.006 | ||
| Reduction in | — | 33.84 | 62.36 | 95.82 | |
| 0.251±0.006 | 0.151±0.006 | 0.077±0.007 | 0.027±0.005 | ||
| Reduction in | — | 39.84 | 69.32 | 89.24 | |
| 0.265±0.005 | 0.180±0.009 | 0.030±0.004 | 0.012±0.003 | ||
| Reduction in | — | 32.08 | 88.68 | 95.47 | |
| 0.141±0.001 | 0.139±0.002 | 0.074±0.004 | 0.010±0.003 | ||
| Reduction in | — | 1.42 | 47.52 | 92.91 | |
| 0.319±0.002 | 0.271±0.004 | 0.109±0.004 | 0.008±0.007 | ||
| Reduction in | — | 15.05 | 65.83 | 97.49 | |
ATCC, American Type Culture Collection.Values were obtained from spectrophotometric assay and expressed as mean±standard deviation of three independent experiments performed in triplicate (n=9).
Figure 2Composite micrographs illustrating the morphological changes of seven (a) C. albicans; (b) C. dubliniensis; (c) C. glabrata; (d) C. krusei; (e) C. lusitaniae; (f) C. parapsilosis; (g) C. tropicalis. 1, Control, untreated; 2, treated with P. betle extract. Magnification: ×5 000. , Dense deposits; , buds and dividing state; , decomposition and shrunk; , punctates.
Deviations in the sizes of candidal cells following treatment of Piper betle extract
| Normal | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length/µm | Width/µm | Length/µm | Width/µm | |
| 3.93±0.30 | 3.07±0.15 | 3.20±0.51a | 2.73±0.19a | |
| 4.11±0.48 | 2.40±0.15 | 3.57±0.47 | 2.43±0.13 | |
| 3.13±0.39 | 2.33±0.39 | 2.43±0.23a | 1.87±0.45 | |
| 6.65±0.52 | 1.95±0.16 | 6.00±0.71 | 1.85±0.48 | |
| 3.80±0.44 | 2.56±0.25 | 3.16±0.24a | 2.40±0.21 | |
| 4.56±0.34 | 2.36±0.28 | 4.04±0.63 | 2.32±0.25 | |
| 3.80±0.51 | 2.80±0.18 | 3.77±0.59 | 2.90±0.33 | |
ATCC, American Type Culture Collection.
P<0.05 comparing to the untreated (normal) candidal cell sizes.Values are expressed as mean±standard deviation of nine determinations (n=9).
Tentative identification of major compounds in crude extract of betel leaves (Piper betle) by LC-MS/MS
| Peak | Rt/min | Tentative names of compounds | MW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.49 | Hydroxybenzoic acid (C7H6O3) | 138 | 137.0 |
| 2 | 4.27 | Chavibetol (C10H12O2) | 164 | 163.0 |
| 3 | 5.47 | Hydroxychavicol (C9H10O2) | 150 | 149.0 |
LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography-mass spectrophotometry; MW, molecular weight; Rt, retention time; m/z, mass-to-charge ratio.