BACKGROUND: The role of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in incurable cachectic cancer patients unable to eat is extremely controversial. The aim of this study is to analyse which factors can influence the outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied prospectively 414 incurable cachectic (sub)obstructed cancer patients receiving HPN and analysed the association between patient or clinical characteristics and surviving status. RESULTS: Median weight loss, versus pre-disease and last 6-month period, was 24% and 16%, respectively. Median body mass index was 19.5, median KPS was 60, median life expectancy was 3 months. Mean/median survival was 4.7/3.0 months; 50.0% and 22.9% of patients survived 3 and 6 months, respectively. At the multivariable analysis, the variables significantly associated with 3- and 6-month survival were Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and KPS, and GPS, KPS and tumour spread, respectively. By the aggregation of the significant variables, it was possible to dissect several classes of patients with different survival probabilities. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of cachectic incurable cancer patients on HPN is not homogeneous. It is possible to identify groups of patients with a ≥6-month survival (possibly longer than that allowed in starvation). The indications for HPN can be modulated on these clinical/biochemical indices.
BACKGROUND: The role of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in incurable cachectic cancerpatients unable to eat is extremely controversial. The aim of this study is to analyse which factors can influence the outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied prospectively 414 incurable cachectic (sub)obstructed cancerpatients receiving HPN and analysed the association between patient or clinical characteristics and surviving status. RESULTS: Median weight loss, versus pre-disease and last 6-month period, was 24% and 16%, respectively. Median body mass index was 19.5, median KPS was 60, median life expectancy was 3 months. Mean/median survival was 4.7/3.0 months; 50.0% and 22.9% of patients survived 3 and 6 months, respectively. At the multivariable analysis, the variables significantly associated with 3- and 6-month survival were Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and KPS, and GPS, KPS and tumour spread, respectively. By the aggregation of the significant variables, it was possible to dissect several classes of patients with different survival probabilities. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of cachectic incurable cancerpatients on HPN is not homogeneous. It is possible to identify groups of patients with a ≥6-month survival (possibly longer than that allowed in starvation). The indications for HPN can be modulated on these clinical/biochemical indices.
Entities:
Keywords:
cancer cachexia; home parenteral nutrition; incurable cancer patient; malignant obstruction
Authors: Anne Marie Sowerbutts; Simon Lal; Jana Sremanakova; Andrew Clamp; Chris Todd; Gordon C Jayson; Antje Teubner; Anne-Marie Raftery; Eileen J Sutton; Lisa Hardy; Sorrel Burden Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-08-10
Authors: B R Disney; A Karthikeyakurup; J Ratcliffe; J Jones; P Deel-Smith; A Fairhurst; K Maleki; S C Cooper Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez; Laura Redondo-Flórez; Alejandro Rubio-Zarapuz; Ismael Martínez-Guardado; Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez; José Francisco Tornero-Aguilera Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Claribel Simmons; Donald C McMillan; Sharon Tuck; Cat Graham; Alistair McKeown; Mike Bennett; Claire O'Neill; Andrew Wilcock; Caroline Usborne; Kenneth C Fearon; Marie Fallon; Barry J Laird Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-04-11
Authors: Paolo Cotogni; Luca De Carli; Roberto Passera; Maria Luisa Amerio; Elena Agnello; Maurizio Fadda; Marta Ossola; Taira Monge; Antonella De Francesco; Federico Bozzetti Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2017-05-29 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Elena Matveeva; John Maiorano; Qingyang Zhang; Abdallah M Eteleeb; Paolo Convertini; Jing Chen; Vittoria Infantino; Stefan Stamm; Jiping Wang; Eric C Rouchka; Yvonne N Fondufe-Mittendorf Journal: Cell Discov Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 10.849