Literature DB >> 24406272

A comparison study of haemolysis production in three contemporary centrifugal pumps.

S Bottrell1, M Bennett2, S Augustin2, C Thuys2, B Schultz2, A Horton2, S Horton3.   

Abstract

One challenge in providing extracorporeal circulation is to supply optimal flow while minimising adverse effects, such as haemolysis. To determine if the recent generation constrained vortex pumps with their inherent design improvements would lead to reduced red cell trauma, we undertook a study comparing three devices. Utilizing a simulated short-term ventricular assist circuit primed with whole human blood, we examined changes in plasma free haemoglobin values over a six-day period. The three pumps investigated were the Maquet Rotaflow, the Levitronix PediVAS and the Medos Deltastream DP3.This study demonstrated that all three pumps produced low levels of haemolysis and are suitable for use in a clinical environment. The Levitronix PediVAS was significantly less haemolytic than either the Rotaflow (p<0.05) or the DP3 (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in plasma free haemoglobin between the Rotaflow and the DP3 (p=0.71).
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECLS; ECMO; VAD; centrifugal pump; diagonal pump; haemolysis; hybrid pump

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24406272     DOI: 10.1177/0267659113509000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perfusion        ISSN: 0267-6591            Impact factor:   1.972


  6 in total

Review 1.  Extracorporeal techniques in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Madhavi Parekh; Darryl Abrams; Daniel Brodie
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-07

2.  Using Daily Plasma-Free Hemoglobin Levels for Diagnosis of Critical Pump Thrombus in Patients Undergoing ECMO or VAD Support.

Authors:  James R Neal; Eduard Quintana; Roxann B Pike; James D Hoyer; Lyle D Joyce; Gregory Schears
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2015-06

3.  Plasma Free Hemoglobin Is an Independent Predictor of Mortality among Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support.

Authors:  Hesham R Omar; Mehdi Mirsaeidi; Stephanie Socias; Collin Sprenker; Christiano Caldeira; Enrico M Camporesi; Devanand Mangar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Veno-venous ECMO: a synopsis of nine key potential challenges, considerations, and controversies.

Authors:  David B Tulman; Stanislaw P A Stawicki; Bryan A Whitson; Saarik C Gupta; Ravi S Tripathi; Michael S Firstenberg; Don Hayes; Xuzhong Xu; Thomas J Papadimos
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Factors associated with hemolysis during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-Comparison of VA- versus VV ECMO.

Authors:  Hannah Appelt; Alois Philipp; Thomas Mueller; Maik Foltan; Matthias Lubnow; Dirk Lunz; Florian Zeman; Karla Lehle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Haemolysis induced by mechanical circulatory support devices: unsolved problems.

Authors:  Inge Köhne
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 1.972

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.