Literature DB >> 24405879

Female genital cosmetic surgery.

Dorothy Shaw1, Guylaine Lefebvre2, Celine Bouchard3, Jodi Shapiro2, Jennifer Blake2, Lisa Allen2, Krista Cassell4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide Canadian gynaecologists with evidence-based direction for female genital cosmetic surgery in response to increasing requests for, and availability of, vaginal and vulvar surgeries that fall well outside the traditional realm of medically-indicated reconstructions. EVIDENCE: Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed or MEDLINE, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library in 2011 and 2012 using appropriate controlled vocabulary and key words (female genital cosmetic surgery). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date or language restrictions. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to May 2012. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES: The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table). Recommendations 1. The obstetrician and gynaecologist should play an important role in helping women to understand their anatomy and to respect individual variations. (III-A) 2. For women who present with requests for vaginal cosmetic procedures, a complete medical, sexual, and gynaecologic history should be obtained and the absence of any major sexual or psychological dysfunction should be ascertained. Any possibility of coercion or exploitation should be ruled out. (III-B) 3. Counselling should be a priority for women requesting female genital cosmetic surgery. Topics should include normal variation and physiological changes over the lifespan, as well as the possibility of unintended consequences of cosmetic surgery to the genital area. The lack of evidence regarding outcomes and the lack of data on the impact of subsequent changes during pregnancy or menopause should also be discussed and considered part of the informed consent process. (III-L) 4. There is little evidence to support any of the female genital cosmetic surgeries in terms of improvement to sexual satisfaction or self-image. Physicians choosing to proceed with these cosmetic procedures should not promote these surgeries for the enhancement of sexual function and advertising of female genital cosmetic surgical procedures should be avoided (III-L) 5. Physicians who see adolescents requesting female genital cosmetic surgery require additional expertise in counselling adolescents. Such procedures should not be offered until complete maturity including genital maturity, and parental consent is not required at that time. (III-L) 6. Non-medical terms, including but not restricted to vaginal rejuvenation, clitoral resurfacing, and G-spot enhancement, should be recognized as marketing terms only, with no medical origin; therefore they cannot be scientifically evaluated. (III-L).

Entities:  

Keywords:  G-spot augmentation; clitoral hood size reduction; female genital cosmetic surgery; hymenoplasty; labioplasty; perineoplasty; vaginoplasty; vulvo-vaginal

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24405879     DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30762-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  7 in total

Review 1.  Native Tissue Repairs for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Justin Houman; James M Weinberger; Karyn S Eilber
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  How Should We Respond to Non-Dominant Healing Practices, the Example of Homeopathy.

Authors:  Ben Gray
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Quantitative Assessment and Interpretation of Vaginal Conditions.

Authors:  Vladimir Egorov; Miles Murphy; Vincent Lucente; Heather van Raalte; Sonya Ephrain; Nina Bhatia; Noune Sarvazyan
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.491

Review 4.  Cosmetic labiaplasty on minors: a review of current trends and evidence.

Authors:  Andreas Kalampalikis; Lina Michala
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Hymen and virginity: What every paediatrician should know.

Authors:  Dehlia Moussaoui; Jasmine Abdulcadir; Michal Yaron
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 1.929

6.  Female genital mutilation/cutting type IV in Cambodia: a case report.

Authors:  Jasmine Abdulcadir; Olivier Irion; Begoña Martinez de Tejada
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2015-10-07

7.  Vaginal sling implant misdiagnosed as rectal subepithelial tumor.

Authors:  Su-Mi Kim; Ji-Suk Han; Jin-Wan Park; Jong-Soo Kim; Hwan Namgung; Yun-Dan Kang
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2018-06-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.