Literature DB >> 24405625

Outcome of porous tantalum acetabular components for Paprosky type 3 and 4 acetabular defects.

Eldridge D Batuyong1, Hugh S Brock1, Nikhil Thiruvengadam1, William J Maloney1, Stuart B Goodman1, James I Huddleston1.   

Abstract

Porous tantalum acetabular implants provide a potential solution for dealing with significant acetabular bone loss. This study reviews 24 acetabular revisions using tantalum implants for Paprosky type 3 and 4 defects. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 35 ± 19 (range, 4-71) to 88 ± 14 (range, 41-100), p < 0.0001. Postoperative radiographs showed radiolucent lines in 14 hips with a mean width of 1.3 ± 1.0 mm (range, 0.27-4.37 mm). No gaps enlarged and 71% of them disappeared at a mean of 13 ± 10 months (range, 3-29 months). At a mean follow-up of 37 ± 14 months (range, 24-66 months), 22 reconstructions showed radiograpic evidence of osseointegration (92%). The two failures were secondary to septic loosening. When dealing with severe acetabular bone loss, porous tantalum acetabular components show promising short-term results.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Harris Hip Score; acetabulum; osseointegration; porous tantalum; radiolucent line; revision hip surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24405625     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

Review 1.  Treatment options for chronic pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  Mark D Hasenauer; Wayne G Paprosky; Neil P Sheth
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-09-18

2.  Acetabular Reconstruction Using Multiple Porous Tantalum Augments: Three-Quarter Football Augment.

Authors:  C H Ansorge; M Ohlmeier; T M Ballhause; T Gehrke; M Citak; M Lee
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2022-05-21

3.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of trabecular metal systems and antiprotrusion cages in acetabular revision surgery with severe defects: a comparative study.

Authors:  Irene Isabel López-Torres; Pablo Sanz-Ruíz; Coral Sánchez-Pérez; Ricardo Andrade-Albarracín; Javier Vaquero
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Are porous tantalum cups superior to conventional reinforcement rings?

Authors:  Anders Brüggemann; Erik Fredlund; Hans Mallmin; Nils P Hailer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Acetabular revisions using porous tantalum components: A retrospective study with 5-10 years follow-up.

Authors:  Francesco Roberto Evola; Luciano Costarella; Giuseppe Evola; Martina Barchitta; Antonella Agodi; Giuseppe Sessa
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-07-18

6.  Do dual-mobility cups cemented into porous tantalum shells reduce the risk of dislocation after revision surgery?

Authors:  Anders Brüggemann; Hans Mallmin; Nils P Hailer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  The patient-specific Triflange acetabular implant for revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with severe acetabular defects: planning, implantation, and results.

Authors:  M E Berend; K R Berend; A V Lombardi; H Cates; P Faris
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Staged Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Novel Technique in Managing Native and Periprosthetic Acetabular Insufficiency.

Authors:  John V Horberg; J Ross Bailey; Kathleen Kay; D Gordon Allan
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-05-31

9.  Bone impaction grafting with trabecular metal augments in large defects in young patients: unravelling a new perspective in surgical technique.

Authors:  Basilio De la Torre-Escuredo; Eva Gómez-García; Salvador Álvarez-Villar; Julia Bujan; Miguel A Ortega
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.