Literature DB >> 24405518

Decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment in a Norwegian intensive care unit.

H Hoel1, S A Skjaker, R Haagensen, K Stavem.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To withhold and withdraw treatment are important and difficult decisions made in the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of withholding or withdrawing treatment, characteristics of the patients, and how these decision processes were handled and documented in a general ICU from 2007 to 2009 in a university hospital in Norway.
METHODS: Patient characteristics and outcomes of treatment were prospectively registered. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records for information on limitations in treatment.
RESULTS: In total, 1287 patients were admitted to the ICU. The ICU mortality was 208 (16%), and the hospital mortality was 341 (26%). In total, 301 patients (23%) had treatment withheld or withdrawn. Medical and unscheduled surgical patients with limitations in treatment had higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (P < 0.001) and were older (P < 0.001) than those without limitations in treatment. The most common main reason for withdrawing treatment was poor prognosis. According to the medical records, the patient was involved in the decision-making regarding withdrawal of treatment in only 2% of the cases, and the patient's relatives were involved in the decision-making in 77% of the cases. In 12% of the cases, type of treatment withdrawn was not documented.
CONCLUSION: Withholding or withdrawing treatment in the ICU was common. Medical and unscheduled surgical patients with limitations in treatment were older and more severely ill than patients without limitations. There is a potential for better documentation of the processes regarding withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining intensive care treatment.
© 2014 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24405518     DOI: 10.1111/aas.12246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  13 in total

1.  Respective impact of no escalation of treatment, withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment on ICU patients' prognosis: a multicenter study of the Outcomerea Research Group.

Authors:  Alexandre Lautrette; Maïté Garrouste-Orgeas; Pierre-Marie Bertrand; Dany Goldgran-Toledano; Samir Jamali; Virginie Laurent; Laurent Argaud; Carole Schwebel; Bruno Mourvillier; Michaël Darmon; Stéphane Ruckly; Anne-Sylvie Dumenil; Virginie Lemiale; Bertrand Souweine; Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  [Palliative therapy concepts in intensive care medicine].

Authors:  M Schuster; M Ferner; M Bodenstein; R Laufenberg-Feldmann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining therapy in older adults (≥ 80 years) admitted to the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Bertrand Guidet; Hans Flaatten; Ariane Boumendil; Alessandro Morandi; Finn H Andersen; Antonio Artigas; Guido Bertolini; Maurizio Cecconi; Steffen Christensen; Loredana Faraldi; Jesper Fjølner; Christian Jung; Brian Marsh; Rui Moreno; Sandra Oeyen; Christina Agwald Öhman; Bernardo Bollen Pinto; Ivo W Soliman; Wojciech Szczeklik; Andreas Valentin; Ximena Watson; Tilemachos Zafeiridis; Dylan W De Lange
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Withholding or withdrawal of treatment under French rules: a study performed in 43 intensive care units.

Authors:  Olivier Lesieur; Maxime Leloup; Frédéric Gonzalez; Marie-France Mamzer
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 6.925

5.  Simplified Acute Physiology Score II as Predictor of Mortality in Intensive Care Units: A Decision Curve Analysis.

Authors:  Jérôme Allyn; Cyril Ferdynus; Michel Bohrer; Cécile Dalban; Dorothée Valance; Nicolas Allou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Factors associated with life-sustaining treatment restriction in a general intensive care unit.

Authors:  Stein Arve Skjaker; Henrik Hoel; Vegard Dahl; Knut Stavem
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Charlson comorbidity index derived from chart review or administrative data: agreement and prediction of mortality in intensive care patients.

Authors:  Knut Stavem; Henrik Hoel; Stein Arve Skjaker; Rolf Haagensen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.790

8.  Limiting treatment and shortening of life: data from a cross-sectional survey in Germany on frequencies, determinants and patients' involvement.

Authors:  Birte Malena Dahmen; Jochen Vollmann; Stephan Nadolny; Jan Schildmann
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.234

9.  Who decides in withdrawal of treatment in a critical care setting? A case study on ethical dilemma.

Authors:  Chunmei Lyu; Li Zhang
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2018-06-26

10.  Withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in intensive care units in Lebanon: a cross-sectional survey of intensivists and interviews of professional societies, legal and religious leaders.

Authors:  Rita El Jawiche; Souheil Hallit; Lubna Tarabey; Fadi Abou-Mrad
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.