Literature DB >> 24403887

Balloon against Jackhammer Disorder.

A L Pelletier1, D Pospai1, M Merrouche2.   

Abstract

We describe a patient with dysphagia. The results of endoscopy, CT scan and echoendoscopy were normal. High-resolution manometry (HRM) showed esogastric junction dysfunction and hypercontractile peristaltic disorder. These HRM abnormalities completely disappeared after pneumatic esophageal dilatation. We discuss the treatment options and recovery of peristalsis after balloon dilatation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dysphagia; Esophageal disorder; High-resolution manometry; Pneumatic dilatation

Year:  2013        PMID: 24403887      PMCID: PMC3884175          DOI: 10.1159/000355873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1662-0631


Introduction

High-resolution manometry (HRM) has profoundly changed the exploration of esophageal motility by allowing the measurement of many levels of the esophagus. The Chicago classification was developed to facilitate the interpretation of HRM and to promote widespread use of HRM in clinical practice even if some disorders have not yet been addressed [1, 2]. Achalasia is characterized by impaired relaxation and the absence of normally propagated peristaltic contractions. We describe a patient with impaired esogastric junction relaxation and hypercontractile peristaltic disorder. Treatment led to an unusual recovery.

Case Report

A 37-year-old woman was referred to the hospital in November 2012 for dysphagia. The patient had been experiencing thoracic pain and dysphagia for solids for 6 months and lost 20 kg. She had no prior medical history, was not taking any medication and did not smoke. Esogastroduodenal endoscopy with biopsy was normal, excluding eosinophilic esophagitis. Echoendoscopy and thoracic CT scan were also normal, with no muscular thickening and no mediastinal tumor. Esogastroduodenal transit did not show any esophageal dilatation. HRM (Sierra Given) was performed. The catheter was placed transnasally and positioned to obtain recordings from the hypopharynx to the stomach with 36 circumferentially sensitive sensors. The catheter was attached to the nose. The transducers were calibrated. The HRM protocol included at least one 30 s assessment of basal sphincter pressure and ten 5 ml water swallows in a supine position. Esogastric junction pressure was 32 mm Hg (normal <43) and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) 20 mm Hg (normal <15), showing impaired relaxation after swallowing. The mean distal contractile integral (DCI) was 8,063 mm Hg cm s and the contractile front velocity was 74.3 cm/s (normal <6.3). Intrabolus pressure was high at 10 mm Hg (normal <8.4), suggesting esophageal stasis. Based on these results, pneumatic dilatation was performed with a Rigiflex balloon (Boston Scientific) positioned at the esogastric junction. The balloon was inflated to 30 mm 5 PSI for 1 min and 8 PSI for 1 min. Three months after endoscopy, the patient described clinical improvement with only two episodes of dysphagia, no chest pain, no regurgitation and weigh gain. HRM showed an esogastric junction pressure of 25 mm Hg (normal <43), IRP 12 mm Hg (normal <15), mean DCI 2,514 mm Hg cm s and normal peristalsis. The patient had no symptoms at 6 months.

Discussion

This case report shows a patient with abnormal basal esogastric junction pressure, high IRP and a hypercontractile peristaltic disorder of the esophagus. The association of these motility disorders is not described in the Chicago classification [2]. These results suggest a jackhammer esophagus due to the DCI above 8,000 mm Hg cm s, a result which is never found in control subjects. Achalasia is also suggested because of the IRP. Three clinically relevant subtypes of achalasia are described with panesophageal pressurization in type 2 but without the high DCI and no normal peristalsis. Jackhammer esophagus is rare (4.1% in a tertiary center) and mainly revealed by dysphagia [3]. Roman et al. [3] described three patterns of hypercontractility: multipeaked and synchronized with breathing, multipeaked not synchronized with breathing and not multipeaked. The mean IRP was significantly higher in the group of patients without multipeaked contractions (n = 8). The goal of treatment in this patient was to relieve dysphagia. Pneumatic dilatation was chosen because the HRM results were unusual. Laparoscopic myotomy was another option. A study comparing pneumatic dilatation and laparoscopic myotomy for achalasia after 2-year follow-up showed no difference between the two groups [4]. Pneumatic dilatation has been shown to be more effective in type 2 achalasia [5]. Peroral esophageal myotomy has also been described [6]. Injection of botulinum toxin is effective in relieving symptoms in 85% of patients, but symptoms recur in 50% at 6 months. This is an alternative treatment option which is mainly used for older or high-risk patients [7, 8, 9]. There is no definitive treatment and the existing options palliate dysphagia by lowering esogastric junction pressure. There is no validated treatment for jackhammer disorder: pneumatic dilatation, myotomy and botulinum toxin injections should be considered for these patients. The effect of treatment on the HRM results was also unusual. IRP and DCI were normal and peristalsis was present. One explanation is that the patient consulted soon after the first symptoms, while most patients wait years before undergoing HRM. Roman et al. [10] described partial recovery of peristalsis in some achalasia patients after myotomy. This suggests that esogastric junction obstruction may play a role in peristalsis failure in some achalasia patients. In conclusion, we describe a patient with a rare esophageal motility disorder. The hypothesis of early-stage achalasia is possible and could provide information on the physiopathology of this disease. One session of dilatation had relieved the symptoms and the motility disorder at 6-month follow-up.
  10 in total

1.  Phenotypes and clinical context of hypercontractility in high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (EPT).

Authors:  Sabine Roman; John E Pandolfino; Joan Chen; Lubomyr Boris; Daniel Luger; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller's myotomy for idiopathic achalasia.

Authors:  Guy E Boeckxstaens; Vito Annese; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes; Stanislas Chaussade; Mario Costantini; Antonello Cuttitta; J Ignasi Elizalde; Uberto Fumagalli; Marianne Gaudric; Wout O Rohof; André J Smout; Jan Tack; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Giovanni Zaninotto; Olivier R Busch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Achalasia and esophago-gastric junction outflow obstruction: focus on the subtypes.

Authors:  G Boeckxstaens; G Zaninotto
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 4.  Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; M Fox; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino; W Schwizer; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for oesophageal achalasia: preliminary results in humans.

Authors:  Guido Costamagna; Michele Marchese; Pietro Familiari; Andrea Tringali; Haruhiro Inoue; Vincenzo Perri
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 4.088

6.  Outcomes of treatment for achalasia depend on manometric subtype.

Authors:  Wout O Rohof; Renato Salvador; Vito Annese; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes; Stanislas Chaussade; Mario Costantini; J Ignasi Elizalde; Marianne Gaudric; André J Smout; Jan Tack; Olivier R Busch; Giovanni Zaninotto; Guy E Boeckxstaens
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Achalasia: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  M F Vaezi
Journal:  Semin Gastrointest Dis       Date:  1999-07

Review 8.  2011 update on esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  Seng-Kee Chuah; Pin-I Hsu; Keng-Liang Wu; Deng-Chyang Wu; Wei-Chen Tai; Chi-Sin Changchien
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Partial recovery of peristalsis after myotomy for achalasia: more the rule than the exception.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Peter J Kahrilas; François Mion; Thomas B Nealis; Nathaniel J Soper; Gilles Poncet; Frédéric Nicodème; Eric Hungness; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  High-resolution Manometry: Esophageal Disorders Not Addressed by the "Chicago Classification".

Authors:  Yu Tien Wang; Etsuro Yazaki; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.924

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Deanxit relieves symptoms in a patient with jackhammer esophagus: A case report.

Authors:  Jin-Ying Li; Wen-Huan Zhang; Chun-Ling Huang; Dang Huang; Guo-Wen Zuo; Lie-Xin Liang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-12-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.