| Literature DB >> 24403787 |
Ambika Gupta1, Freny R Karjodkar2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is one name that causes panic and holds an undeserved high ranking as a killer. Another important condition which has become a major public health issue in South East Asia is oral submucous fibrosis (OSF). Not all the people using tobacco suffer from these diseases. Genetic predisposition might explain such an individual variability that can be predicted by using various cytogenetic markers. However, these studies are far more costly and complicated. So, dermatoglyphics may be of immense clinical significance to segregate those individuals who are at an increased risk for developing these diseases. AIM: The present study was conducted to analyze the palmar dermatoglyphics in SCC and OSF and find a dermatoglyphic marker, if any. STUDYEntities:
Keywords: Finger prints; genetic marker; oral squamous cell carcinoma; oral submucous fibrosis
Year: 2013 PMID: 24403787 PMCID: PMC3883322 DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.123039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contemp Clin Dent ISSN: 0976-2361
Comparison of difference in prevalence of the finger print patterns in different study groups
Comparison of mean TFRC in different study groups (using one way ANOVA)
Scheffe's test applied
Graph 1aComparison of various palmar pattern frequencies in right hand between four study groups
Graph 1bComparison of various palmar pattern frequencies in left hand between four study groups
Comparison of mean atd angle in the right hand in different study groups (using one way ANOVA)
Comparison of difference in mean at dangle in the right hand between different study groups (using Scheffe's test)
comparison of mean atd angle in the left hand in different study groups (using one way ANOVA)
Comparison of difference in mean atd angle in the left hand between different study groups (using Scheffe's test)
comparison of prevalence of accessory triradii of the right hand between the four study groups
Comparison of prevalence of accessory of the left hand between the four study groups