Literature DB >> 24402984

Reliability and validity of a test designed to assess combat medics' readiness to perform life-saving procedures.

Connie C Schmitz1, Jeffrey G Chipman1, Ken Yoshida1, Rachel Isaksson Vogel2, Francois Sainfort3, Gregory Beilman1, Joseph Clinton4, Jimmy Cooper5, Troy Reihsen6, Robert M Sweet6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Reducing preventable deaths because of uncontrolled hemorrhage, tension pneumothorax, and airway loss is a priority. As part of a research initiative comparing different training models, this study evaluated the reliability and validity of a test that assesses combat medic performance during a polytrauma scenario using live animal models.
METHODS: Nine procedural checklists and seven global rating scales were piloted with four cohorts of soldiers (n = 94) at two U.S. training sites. Cohorts represented "novice" to "proficient" trainees. Procedure scores and a mean global score were calculated per subject. The intraclass correlation was calculated per procedure, with 0.70 as the threshold for acceptability. An overall difference among cohorts was hypothesized: Cohort 4 (proficient) > Cohort 3 (competent) > Cohort 2 (beginners) > Cohort 1 (novice) trainees. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and analysis of variance.
RESULTS: At Site A, intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 74% to 93% for 6 of 9 procedures. Cohorts differed significantly on hemorrhage control, needle decompression, cricothyrotomy, amputation management, chest tube insertion, and mean global scores. Cohort 4 outperformed the others, and Cohorts 2 and 3 outperformed Cohort 1.
CONCLUSION: The test differentiates novices from beginners, competent, and proficient trainees on difficult procedures and overall performance. Reprint &
Copyright © 2014 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24402984     DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med        ISSN: 0026-4075            Impact factor:   1.437


  3 in total

1.  Assessment of prehospital hemorrhage and airway care using a simulation model.

Authors:  Mariya E Skube; Seth Witthuhn; Kristine Mulier; Bonnie Boucher; Elizabeth Lusczek; Greg J Beilman
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  Validation of an evaluation instrument for responders in tactical casualty care simulations.

Authors:  Maria Del Carmen Usero-Pérez; Maria Lourdes Jiménez-Rodríguez; Alexandra González-Aguña; Valentín González-Alonso; Luis Orbañanos-Peiro; Jose María Santamaría-García; Jorge Luís Gómez-González
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2020-04-17

3.  Understanding the Cognitive Demands, Skills, and Assessment Approaches for Endotracheal Intubation: Cognitive Task Analysis.

Authors:  Taylor Kunkes; Basiel Makled; Jack Norfleet; Steven Schwaitzberg; Lora Cavuoto
Journal:  JMIR Perioper Med       Date:  2022-04-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.