Literature DB >> 24402722

Effects of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding on weight loss, metabolism, and obesity-related comorbidities: 5-year results in China.

Jie Fan1, Jian Hui Xu, Jia Wang, Gui Zhen Wang, You Qin Zhang, Xing Zhen Liu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite some reports about the long-term metabolic outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) in the Western populations, there are few reports on the Asian population whose body size and fat distribution are different. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the medium-term effects of LAGB on weight loss and metabolic outcomes of obese patients with different body mass index (BMI) in China.
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed to review the 5-year follow-up data of 56 patients (18 males, 38 females) who received LAGB from November 2003 to May 2013 at the Shanghai Changhai Hospital. The patients were evaluated at years 1, 3, and 5 after operation in the outpatient clinic, and the weight loss, metabolic parameters, and remission of comorbidities were measured.
RESULTS: The 56 patients preoperatively had BMI of 37.4 ± 6.0 kg/m2, with BMI < 35 kg/m2 in 19 patients (BMI <35 kg/m2 group), and BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 in 37 patients (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 group). The percentages of excess weight loss (%EWL) of the BMI < 35 kg/m2 group at years 1, 3, and 5 were 65.2, 65.6, and 65.7%, respectively, indicating the majority of metabolic parameters were significantly improved (P < 0.05). However, in the BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 group, the %EWL were 37.9, 34.8, and 26.5%, respectively, except at year 1 when the metabolic parameters improved significantly (P < 0.05), those at year 3 and year 5 did not significantly improve compared with the preoperative levels. Similar results were observed in the improvement of comorbidities.
CONCLUSIONS: Relatively low medium-term weight loss, metabolic improvement, and resolution or remission of obesity-related comorbidities and high reoperation rate were observed in our population of patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 who underwent LAGB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24402722     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-013-1173-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  19 in total

Review 1.  Use and abuse of HOMA modeling.

Authors:  Tara M Wallace; Jonathan C Levy; David R Matthews
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Reporting weight loss 2007.

Authors:  Mervyn Deitel; Khaled Gawdat; John Melissas
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Treating diabetes with surgery.

Authors:  Bruce M Wolfe; Jonathan Q Purnell; Steven H Belle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Long-term metabolic outcome and quality of life after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus or impaired fasting glucose.

Authors:  R Caiazzo; L Arnalsteen; M Pigeyre; G Dezfoulian; H Verkindt; J Kirkby-Bott; P Mathurin; P Fontaine; M Romon; F Pattou
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Impact of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding on type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  J B Dixon; D K Murphy; J E Segel; E A Finkelstein
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 9.213

6.  [Standardize and pragmatism- the key to promote the healthy development of obesity and metabolic surgery in China].

Authors:  Cun-chuan Wang; He-ning Zhai
Journal:  Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2012-11

7.  How do we define cure of diabetes?

Authors:  John B Buse; Sonia Caprio; William T Cefalu; Antonio Ceriello; Stefano Del Prato; Silvio E Inzucchi; Sue McLaughlin; Gordon L Phillips; R Paul Robertson; Francesco Rubino; Richard Kahn; M Sue Kirkman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Ghrelin suppression is associated with weight loss and insulin action following gastric bypass surgery at 12 months in obese adults with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  A Samat; S K Malin; H Huang; P R Schauer; J P Kirwan; S R Kashyap
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 6.577

9.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic gastric bypass, adjustable gastric banding, and nonoperative weight loss interventions.

Authors:  Leon Salem; Allison Devlin; Sean D Sullivan; David R Flum
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 4.734

10.  Comparison between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sen Wang; Ping Li; Xiao Fang Sun; Nian Yuan Ye; Ze Kuan Xu; Daorong Wang
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.129

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic Devices for Obesity.

Authors:  Kartik Sampath; Amreen M Dinani; Richard I Rothstein
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2016-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.