Literature DB >> 24402596

Maternal hemodynamics by thoracic impedance cardiography for normal pregnancy and the postpartum period.

Rachael Morris1, Imran Sunesara, Laura Rush, Belinda Anderson, Pamela G Blake, Marie Darby, Sandip Sawardecker, Sarah Novotny, James A Bofill, James N Martin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish normative impedance cardiography values for the second half of pregnancy and up to 48 hours postpartum after either vaginal or cesarean delivery.
METHODS: A single-center prospective observational institutional review board-approved study of normotensive women (n=168) using thoracic impedance cardiography performed at specific times during gestation. Antepartum testing was performed at three time periods: 20-27 weeks, 28-33 weeks, and 34-40 weeks of gestation. Postpartum testing was undertaken after the immediate puerperium at 6-23 hours and 24-48 hours after vaginal or cesarean delivery. Data analysis was performed using STATA software; data are expressed as mean±standard deviation.
RESULTS: All seven of the patient groups studied were comparable with regard to demographic features; 80% of the study participants were African American. Group means obtained between 20 and 40 weeks of gestation and postpartum after vaginal and cesarean delivery fell within the "normal range" of the hemodynamic graph that was developed to associate mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance. The thoracic fluid content group means in both vaginal and cesarean delivery groups were higher than the antepartum patient groups. The thoracic fluid content mean after cesarean delivery at 48 hours is significantly higher than the mean value recorded between 20 and 27 weeks of gestation (P<.05). The systemic vascular resistance systemic vascular resistance means in each of the postpartum groups were significantly higher than the late second-trimester group means recorded at 20-27 weeks of gestation (P<.05).
CONCLUSION: The normative values reported in this investigation can be used to interpret and assess similarly tested patients with hypertensive or otherwise complicated pregnancy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24402596     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Uterine artery impedance during the first eight postpartum weeks.

Authors:  L Guedes-Martins; A R Gaio; J Saraiva; A Cunha; F Macedo; H Almeida
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy.

Authors:  Jordan P R McIntyre; Kevin M Ellyett; Edwin A Mitchell; Gina M Quill; John Md Thompson; Alistair W Stewart; Robert N Doughty; Peter R Stone
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Agreement between preload reserve measured by impedance cardiography and echocardiography during pregnancy.

Authors:  Huan Liang; Åse Vårtun; Ganesh Acharya
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Relative Postpartum Retinal Vasoconstriction Detected With Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Benjamin R Lin; Fei Lin; Li Su; Marco Nassisi; SriniVas R Sadda; Stephanie L Gaw; Irena Tsui
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Maternal functional hemodynamics in the second half of pregnancy: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Åse Vårtun; Kari Flo; Tom Wilsgaard; Ganesh Acharya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Electrical Bioimpedance Spectroscopy on Acute Unilateral Stroke Patients: Initial Observations regarding Differences between Sides.

Authors:  Fernando Seoane; Seyed Reza Atefi; Jens Tomner; Konstantinos Kostulas; Kaj Lindecrantz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Impedance cardiography as tool for continuous hemodynamic monitoring during cesarean section: randomized, prospective double blind study.

Authors:  Alessandro D'Ambrosio; Antonella Cotoia; Renata Beck; Potito Salatto; Lada Zibar; Gilda Cinnella
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.217

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.