Literature DB >> 24402570

[Assessment of the benefit of medical devices in surgical practice. Problems and possible solutions].

D Seidel1, P Braß, N Sehnke, V Jakob, W Eglmeier, E A M Neugebauer.   

Abstract

The market approval of medical devices in Germany does not yet require a benefit assessment. Thus, there is a lack of high quality studies that clearly prove the benefit of medical innovations. In the past, the Federal Joint Committee in Germany (G-BA) did not have the opportunity to adequately address this issue of lacking evidence. A law for the improvement of the care structure in the statutory health insurance offers the possibility for the G-BA to obtain evidence for the benefit of medical practice. With an integrated regulation for testing of medical devices the manufacturers have the option to apply for an assessment of new and established treatment methods and to provide scientific evidence for the benefit of medical devices as a requirement for inclusion in the catalogue of services of the statutory health insurance. However, this expanded scope of action is also a challenge for clinicians. The already existing problem of integrating multicenter clinical trials in the surgical routine will remain. The Surgical Study Network Germany (CHIR-Net) offers an ideal way to cope with the increased requirements on studies in the field of medical devices through established partnerships with methodological institutions and practitioners in clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24402570     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-013-2654-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  8 in total

1.  Coordinating a national clinical trials center: the German experience.

Authors:  Christoph M Seiler; Markus K Diener; Nuh Rahbari; Hartwig Bauer; Matthias Rothmund; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  [Mission and tasks of the Coordination Centres for Clinical Trials].

Authors:  S P Luntz; T Gorbauch; B Schröder; M Seibert-Grafe
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  [Multicenter surgical trials recruiting in Germany: current studies].

Authors:  C M Seiler; M N Wente
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Out of joint: the story of the ASR.

Authors:  Deborah Cohen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-05-13

Review 5.  [Why nurses fly and surgeons rotate. The surgical study network CHIR-Net].

Authors:  H Wyen; V Jakob; J Neudecker; S Tenckhoff; D Seidel; M Affüpper-Fink; P Knöll; E A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Medical device recalls and the FDA approval process.

Authors:  Diana M Zuckerman; Paul Brown; Steven E Nissen
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-02-14

7.  Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis.

Authors:  Marc I Chimowitz; Michael J Lynn; Colin P Derdeyn; Tanya N Turan; David Fiorella; Bethany F Lane; L Scott Janis; Helmi L Lutsep; Stanley L Barnwell; Michael F Waters; Brian L Hoh; J Maurice Hourihane; Elad I Levy; Andrei V Alexandrov; Mark R Harrigan; David Chiu; Richard P Klucznik; Joni M Clark; Cameron G McDougall; Mark D Johnson; G Lee Pride; Michel T Torbey; Osama O Zaidat; Zoran Rumboldt; Harry J Cloft
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Commentary: Europe needs a central, transparent, and evidence based regulation process for devices.

Authors:  Michaela Eikermann; Christian Gluud; Matthias Perleth; Claudia Wild; Stefan Sauerland; Iñaki Gutierrez-Ibarluzea; Sunya-Lee Antoine; Jacques Demotes-Mainard; Edmund A M Neugebauer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-05-07
  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  [Complications in surgery: Topic of the year 2015 in Der Chirurg].

Authors:  H Dralle
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 0.955

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.