On the southwest Pacific Coast of Colombia, a field study was initiated to determine the human-vector association between Anopheles (Kerteszia) neivai and fishermen, including their nearby houses. Mosquitoes were collected over 24-h periods from mangrove swamps, marshlands and fishing vessels in three locations, as well as in and around the houses of fishermen. A total of 6,382 mosquitoes were collected. An. neivai was most abundant in mangroves and fishing canoes (90.8%), while Anopheles albimanus was found indoors (82%) and outdoors (73%). One An. neivai and one An. albimanus collected during fishing activities in canoes were positive for Plasmodium vivax , whereas one female An. neivai collected in a mangrove was positive for P. vivax . In the mangroves and fishing canoes, An. neivai demonstrated biting activity throughout the day, peaking between 06:00 pm-07:00 pm and there were two minor peaks at dusk and dawn. These peaks coincided with fishing activities in the marshlands and mangroves, a situation that places the fishermen at risk of contracting malaria when they are performing their daily activities. It is recommended that protective measures be implemented to reduce the risk that fishermen will contract malaria.
On the southwest Pacific Coast of Colombia, a field study was initiated to determine the human-vector association between Anopheles (Kerteszia) neivai and fishermen, including their nearby houses. Mosquitoes were collected over 24-h periods from mangrove swamps, marshlands and fishing vessels in three locations, as well as in and around the houses of fishermen. A total of 6,382 mosquitoes were collected. An. neivai was most abundant in mangroves and fishing canoes (90.8%), while Anopheles albimanus was found indoors (82%) and outdoors (73%). One An. neivai and one An. albimanus collected during fishing activities in canoes were positive for Plasmodium vivax , whereas one female An. neivai collected in a mangrove was positive for P. vivax . In the mangroves and fishing canoes, An. neivai demonstrated biting activity throughout the day, peaking between 06:00 pm-07:00 pm and there were two minor peaks at dusk and dawn. These peaks coincided with fishing activities in the marshlands and mangroves, a situation that places the fishermen at risk of contracting malaria when they are performing their daily activities. It is recommended that protective measures be implemented to reduce the risk that fishermen will contract malaria.
Anopheles (Kerteszia) neivai has a wide distribution in the neotropics,
ranging from southern Mexico to Ecuador, with some records of its appearance in Bolivia,
Peru and northern Brazil ( Zavortink 1973 , Marrelli et al. 2007 ). This species is mainly found on
the Pacific Coast of Colombia in association with epiphytic and terrestrial bromeliads (
Montoya-Lerma et al. 2011 ). In this region,
An. neivai is considered a vector of humanmalaria ( Carvajal et al. 1989 , Olano et al. 2001 , Gutiérrez et al. 2008
). Of all Kerteszia species reported in Colombia, An.
neivai has been the most studied, although much remains to be learned about its
distribution and epidemiological importance. Previous studies have examined biting
activity, oviposition sites, vectorial incrimination and epidemiological and sociological
data, which have shown exophilic and exophagic preferences for biting throughout the day,
sylvatic biting activity, high anthropophily, multiparity and natural infection with
Plasmodium ( Astaiza et al. 1988
, Murillo et al. 1988 , Carvajal et al. 1989 , Solarte et al.
1996 , Montoya-Lerma et al. 2011 ).The Colombian Pacific region has optimal conditions for the survival of this species. This
is likely a result of the abundance of bromeliad epiphytes, which are its oviposition sites
and the fact that many settlements are located near forested areas, which facilitates
mosquito-human contact. Given these biological and behavioural characteristics, it is
believed that this species could be playing an important role in the transmission of
extradomiciliary malaria along the Pacific Coast ( Solarte
et al. 1996 , Montoya-Lerma et al. 2011
).For over two decades, the term “occupational malaria” has been used to indicate occupation
as a risk factor for contracting malaria. This relationship has been documented in several
studies. The occupation types associated with malaria are diverse; among others, health
workers ( Rajasekhar & Nandakumar 2000 ),
workers in the alluvial gold mining areas ( Barbieri &
Sawyer 2007 ) and farmers ( Clark & Kelly
1993 , Dolo et al. 2004 , Sanabria et al. 2004 , da Silva et al. 2010 ) are at increased risk for contracting the disease.
Similarly, illegal labour activities, such as agriculture and mining without control, may
favour the proliferation of oviposition sites, allowing for the maintenance of high
densities of mosquito vectors ( Padilla et al. 2011
). In addition, the anopheline habitat can be increased by certain activities, such as
extensive breeding of cattle, pigs, goats and some birds ( Mboera et al. 2010 ).Even non-endemic areas may present occupational malaria, as reported by Jaremin et al. (1993) in Poland, a country where
malaria cases were documented only in marine fishermen and missionaries who had worked or
were working in endemic areas.In Colombia, there have been few studies examining the relationship between fishing and
malaria risk. Sevilla-Casas (1993) established that,
in the Naya River Basin in the Colombian Pacific, an area where malaria rates are high,
economically related human migration coincides with the highest densities of mosquitoes,
ensuring intense and continuous transmission of malaria. In the delta region, the beach is
a high-risk zone, especially for adults, possibly as a result of high mosquito biting rates
in the beach area. Other studies have shown that fishermen may be at risk of being bitten
by exophagic mosquitoes such as An. neivai , principally by diurnal
exposure or by entering sylvatic environments ( Valderrama
& Santander 1985 , Murillo et al. 1988
, Carvajal et al. 1989 , Solarte et al. 1996 ). The aim of this study was to establish the
biting behaviour of An. neivai at locations indoors, outdoors, outside
homes and in fishing canoes used by fishermen over a 24-h period and to determine if there
is a spatial and temporal correlation between the peaks of An. neivai
biting activity and fishing activities of inhabitants in the area.The current study was conducted on the Pacific Coast of the Nariño department, an area
endemic for malaria and where artisanal fishing is an important economic activity. The
Pacific region has the highest incidence of malaria by Plasmodiumfalciparum infection. Furthermore, high chemoresistance of P.
falciparum to antimalarial drugs has been reported for this department ( Aponte et al. 2011 ). In 2010, 32 cases of malaria (87%
P.
falciparum and 13% Plasmodium
vivax ) were reported, while in 2011, 99 cases (78% P .
falciparum and 22% P.
vivax ) occurred. Of these cases, 55% occurred in males (72 cases) and 45%
occurred in females (59 cases). Among females, the most affected group was school age
children (49.2% of cases), followed by housewives (45.8%). Among males, fishing is
associated with infection by Plasmodium ; 55.6% of reported cases have
been documented in active fishermen. The second group of males at risk comprises students
(40.3%) (Public Health Surveillance System Colombia, Municipal Health Secretary of the
Municipality of Santa Bárbara, unpublished observations).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
S
ite study - The field work was carried out at three localities of Santa
Bárbara-Iscuandé municipality (2º24’54.93”N 77º57’38.35”O). This municipality is located
in the northern part of the department of Nariño (Colombia) and covers 1,232 km
2 .The main site used to determine the biting activity of An. neivai was
the locality of Las Varas. This settlement is surrounded by mangroves and consists of
approximately 80 houses and 250 inhabitants. Of the men, 92% are fishermen and 98% of
women work at home, cooking and cleaning the house. The children attend school in the
mornings, but they go to the mangroves to catch crabs, shells and other molluscs in
their free time.Observations of fishing activities were conducted in three localities: Las Varas,
Juanchillo and La Ensenada ( Fig. 1 ). Natural
infection was determined by the total mosquitoes caught in all three localities,
including mangroves and canoes.
Fig. 1
: study area. Municipality of Santa Bárbara-Iscuandé, localities of Las
Varas, Juanchillo and La Ensenada.
Mosquito collection and sampling strategy - Human landing catches were
constructed in mangrove swamps, marshlands, fishing canoes, outdoors and inside houses.
The outdoor collections were performed at a distance of up to 50 m from dwellings.
Approximately 500 m from the locality of Las Varas, three wooden platforms were
constructed among the mangroves with the aim of collecting female mosquitoes without
interruption from the rising tide. The platforms were placed 150 m from each other.
Canoes were placed at sites within 500 m of Las Varas, at distances ranging from 0-200 m
from the coast, depending on the ease with which a stable canoe position could be
maintained.The collections were made over a period of 14 days between August 2009-November 2011 and
they were divided into two sessions of seven days each to obtain 144 h (6 days) of
continuous sampling at every site. All the sites were sampled simultaneously with one
collector per site, except in canoes, where there were two people per site (a fisherman
and a collector). Collections were made using mouth aspirators and adult females were
captured as they tried to land on the collectors, who were entomological
technicians.The general procedure for 144 h of sampling at each site (6 full days) was as follows:
samplings were made simultaneously at every location (indoors, outdoors, in mangroves
and in canoes) during consecutive 24-h periods. In total, 10 people participated in the
mosquito collections. Sampling sessions were conducted for six continuous hours,
followed by 6 h of rest. Five collectors began the sampling for 6 h and then were
replaced by five others; thus, the sample-rest stage was repeated to achieve 24 h of
sampling at each site. This procedure was repeated until six complete 24-h samplings
were achieved at every site. Every time a 24-h collection was completed at all the
sampling sites, there was a 12-h break to relocate the collectors and begin the sampling
at a new time and place. The collectors were rotated between sites with the aim of
avoiding bias from personal variations in attracting mosquitoes. The captured females
were individually stored in vials and brought to the laboratory for preservation and
taxonomic determination.Mosquito identification - The mosquitoes were identified using keys for
Anopheles ( González & Carrejo
2009 ) and the Kerteszia subgenus species ( Zavortink 1973 ).Molecular confirmation of species - Genomic DNA was extracted from
adult mosquito abdomens with the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (QIAgen ® ,
Germantown, MD, USA). The rDNA internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region was amplified
using the primers of Collins and Paskewitz (1996)
and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) conditions described by Linton et al . (2001) . A portion (710 bp, including primers) of the
barcoding region of cytochrome c oxidase I ( COI ) (mDNA) was amplified
using the primers designed by Folmer et al.
(1994) and the PCR conditions described by Ruiz et al. (2010) . The products were visualised on a 1% agarose gel
containing 0.5 mg/mL of ethidium bromide. The PCR product was purified using ExoSAP-IT
® (USB Corporation, Cleveland, OH, USA).Sequencing reactions were carried out in both directions using the Big Dye Terminator
Kit ® (PE Applied BioSystems, Warrington, England) on an ABI 3730 automated
sequencer (PE Applied BioSystems). The sequences were edited with Sequencher
TM 4.10.1 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) and aligned
manually in MacClade v.4.06 ( Maddison & Maddison
2003 ). Sequence similarities were compared with those available in GenBank
using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) and compared with
sequences available in Barcode of Life Data Systems (barcodinglife.com/). Sequence
statistics were calculated using MEGA v.4 ( Kumar et al.
2008 ).Description of fishing activities - To detect and describe the main
fishing activities in the area, 180 structured interviews of active fishermen were
performed; the time of departure and return from fishing, the preferred sites and times
for fishing, the species of fish captured and the types of fishing methods were
recorded. The fishermen also reported the control measures used to prevent mosquito
bites and whether the measures seemed effective.A total of 50 h of observations were made of fishermen in the field while they performed
their fishing activities. The observation sites consisted of mangroves frequented by
fishermen to set their nets, canoes with fishermen and boarding areas. Three trained
persons recorded the times of departure and arrival of the fishermen, the fish caught
and the fishing technique used. The places where the main fishing activities took place
were georeferenced using a GPS system in the localities of La Ensenada, Juanchillo and
Las Varas.Natural infection - Parasite detection of Plasmodium
species in female mosquitoes was performed using an ELISA ( Wirtz et al. 1985 , 1987 ).
The procedure was adjusted following the guidelines of the standard protocol distributed
with the ELISA kits (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA). Once
identified, the head and thorax of each specimen were separated from the body and
macerated in a vial of 0.5 mL. The remainder of each body (wings, legs and abdomens) was
stored for taxonomic support. Each mosquito was tested individually or in pools of up to
10 specimens, provided that they belonged to the same species, came from the same site
and were collected on the same date. Samples were tested in a 96-well ELISA plate along
with seven negative controls (mosquitoes from a laboratory colony of Anopheles
albimanus ) and two positive controls corresponding to pure circumsporozoite
protein. The results were read in an ELISA reader (MRX DYNEX ® , Magellan
Biosciences) with a 415 nm filter and were rechecked after 1 h. The cut-off used was two
times the average of the negative control, following the directions of Beier et al. (1988) . Positives samples in the first
ELISA underwent a second test. Only the samples that were positive in both tests were
ultimately considered positive.
RESULTS
Species identification - A total 6,382 anopheline mosquitoes were
collected. Two species were found: An. neivai represented 81.2% (5,222
female mosquitoes) and An. albimanus represented 18.2% (1,160 female
mosquitoes) ( Table I ).
TABLE I
Abundance and relative abundance of Anopheles neivai and
Anopheles albimanus in five different sampling sites in
southern coastal Colombian localities
Site
An. neivai (n)
Relative abundance
An. albimanus (n)
Relative abundance
Total (n)
Proportion
Indoors
72
0.27
194
0.73
266
0.04
Outdoors
140
0.24
443
0.76
583
0.09
Mangrove
3,231
0.91
325
0.09
3,556
0.56
Canoe
1,779
0.90
198
0.10
1,977
0.31
Total
5,222
0.82
1,160
0.18
6,382
1.00
the sampling effort corresponds to 144 h (6 full days) per person in every
site.
the sampling effort corresponds to 144 h (6 full days) per person in every
site.Molecular confirmation - A total of 120 DNA sequences were obtained,
corresponding to 30 sequences per collection site. Analysis of these sequences using the
markers COI and ITS2 showed only one haplotype, confirming no intraspecific variation
among the individuals analysed. The ITS2 fragment showed no length variability (546 bp)
and the COI fragment exhibited a length of 650 pb. The COI sequences were compared with
sequences of Barcode of Life Data Systems (boldsystems.org). This comparison showed that
the sequences obtained had a high similarity to sequences of An. neivai
: barcode record MBIB513-10 (99.69% similarity) and barcode record MBIB519-10 (99.54%
similarity).Relative abundance - An. albimanus was the most
abundant species indoors and outdoors (73% and 76%, respectively), while An.
neivai was the most abundant species in extradomiciliary sites such as
mangroves (91%) and canoes (90%).Human biting rates (HBR) - Indoors and outdoors -
Indoors, An. neivai showed a peak between 05:00 pm-07:00 pm. This peak
had a HBR of 15.6 mosquitoes/man/h (m/m/h), with a range of variation (RV) between 30
m/m/h-180 m/m/h. An. albimanus presented one peak between 05:00
pm-07:00 pm, more than twice that of An. neivai (HBR: 38.4 m/m/h), with
decreasing activity throughout the night ( Fig. 2
).
Fig. 2
: man biting activity in indoors of Anopheles neivai and
Anopheles albimanus (geometric mean: 95% confidence
interval), municipality of Iscuandé, Las Varas (sampling for 24 h; n =
841).
Outdoors, both species demonstrated activity beginning at 05:00 pm. The peak of activity
of An. albimanus (HBR: 35.4 m/m/h; RV: 21 m/m/h - 48 m/m/h) was at
07:00 pm and was more than twice that of An. neivai (HBR: 17.6 m/m/h;
RV: 11 m/m/h-24 m/m/h), which occurred at 06:00 pm ( Fig.
3 ).
Fig. 3
: man biting activity in peridomicile of Anopheles neivai
and Anopheles albimanus (geometric mean: 95% confidence
interval), municipality of Iscuandé, Las Varas (sampling for 24 h; n =
906).
Outside the home and in mangroves - In mangroves (wooden platforms),
An. neivai showed the highest biting rates, with a peak at 06:00 pm
(HBR: 64,9 m/m/h; RV: 30 m/m/h-180 m/m/h) and two small peaks at 09:00 pm and 11:00 pm.
This species also exhibited activity all day. In mangroves, An.
albimanus showed very low biting activity relative to An.
neivai , with two small peaks at 09:00 pm and 11:00 pm ( Fig. 4 ).
Fig. 4
: man biting activity in extradomicile (mangrove) of Anopheles
neivai and Anopheles albimanus (geometric mean:
95% confidence interval) near of municipality of Iscuandé, Las Varas (sampling
for 24 h; n = 3,237).
Canoes - In canoes, An . neivai was much more abundant
than An. Albimanus, with a relative abundance of 90%. This mosquito
displayed three peaks of activity: the first between 05:00 am-06:00 am (HBR: 8,3 m/m/h;
RV: 3 m/m/h- 22 m/m/h), the second between 05:00 pm-07:00 pm (16,7 m/m/h; RV: 4 m/m/h-24
m/m/h) and the third between 08:00 pm-10:00 pm (12 m/m/h; RV: 6 m/m/h-30 m/m/h) ( Fig. 5 ). An. neivai and
An . albimanus were detected up to 200 m from the
coast in samplings carried out in canoes during fishing from 05:00 pm-07:00 pm.
Fig. 5
: man biting activity in extradomicile (canoe) of Anopheles
neivai and Anopheles albimanus (geometric mean:
95% confidence interval), municipality of Iscuandé, Las Varas (sampling for 24
h; n = 896).
Fisherman activities - Fishing in the studied area is mostly artisanal
and consists of various activities that place the fishermen at risk of being bitten by
Anopheles. Most of these activities are performed outside the
home.Piangua ( Anadara tuberculosa ) is a mollusc that is
collected in the mangroves at low tide by women and children when they finish their
schoolwork. This collection usually occurs between 07:00 am-10:00 am and between 01:00
pm-03:00 pm. These individuals must enter the mangroves to remove the shells that are
attached to tree roots, thus exposing themselves to An. neivai .
Similarly, native children catch crabs (Arthropoda: Crustacea: Decapoda), which are sold
in the nearby markets, in mangroves. The capture of these arthropods can be performed
all day and throughout the year. During this activity, children may be bitten by
mosquitoes.Fishermen use nets of several metres in length constructed of 2.5” mesh, known as
trasmallo , to capture shrimp. This net is connected to the
mangroves; at high tide, fish enter into flooded areas and then they become trapped in
the nets at low tide. Fishermen assemble these nets between 05:00 am-01:00 pm, during
which they may be bitten by An. neivai .Another method utilises nets of 4” mesh, which are used to capture catfish (
Bagre pinnomaculatus ), snooks ( Centropomus
undecimalis ), sierra ( Scomberomorus sierra ) and green
jack ( Caranx caballus ), among other fish. This net is assembled in a
similar manner, but between 06:00 pm-06:00 am. In both cases, fishermen may be bitten by
mosquitoes when they are either in the mangrove to tie the net or in the canoe to gather
the fish that have been caught.Other fishing activities are performed exclusively by canoe and fishermen leave the
canoes only to land. Many fishermen use homemade hooks that contain baits (known as
calandros ) to capture fish such as snappers (
Lutjanus spp), Panama hake ( Merluccius
angustimanus ), flathead sea catfish ( Arius planiceps and
Arius platypogon ) and chihuil sea catfish ( Bagre
panamensis ). Fishermen paddle their vessels around the mangroves and
estuaries, searching for the best places to throw the calandro . Once
they have found a good place, they wait patiently to catch the quota of fish required
for their livelihood. This activity is usually performed between 5:00 am-07:00 pm.Another important fishing activity is net fishing, where two or three fishermen work
together to place the net into the sea and collect all the fish that have been caught.
Depending on the type of fish they are seeking, they may stay only a few metres from the
mangrove or go far offshore. This activity is performed over a broad time period,
ranging from 04:00 am-12:00 am and it coincides with the three peaks of An.
neivai biting activity.Poor families that cannot afford an outboard motor, which would provide access to more
fishing sites and reach at least 1,000 m offshore, use a small traditional canoe; thus,
their mobility depends on the use of paddles. In such canoes, they navigate through the
mangrove fringe at very low speeds, fishing with simple bait or small nets. Often, they
spend several hours waiting at the edge of the mangrove for the fish to bite, an action
that places them at risk of being bitten by An. neivai.Natural infection - A total of 6,382 female mosquitoes were processed
using the ELISA technique. Three specimens (0.05%) were infected with
Plasmodium . Table II shows
the field code, the species infected, the capture site, date and time and the
Plasmodium species detected. Two females of An.
neivai (2/5222 = 0.04%) were found infected with P. vivax
VK247 and P. vivax VK210. One female An. albimanus
(1/1160 = 0.09%) was infected with P. vivax VK210.
TABLE II
Results of ELISA detection of Plasmodium CS proteins in
6,322 wild-caught female mosquitoes captured using human-landing catches in
southern coastal Colombian localities
Field code
Species
Capture site
Date-capture (time)
Plasmodium species
EIR
249-3
Anopheles neivai
Canoe 200 m from locality Las
Varas
26 Feb 2010 (05:30 pm-06:00
pm)
P. vivax (VK210)
1.8
434-13
An. neivai
Mangrove Las Varas
27 Sep 2010 (01:00 am-02:00
am)
P. vivax (VK247)
2.3
402-27
Anopheles albimanus
Canoe Mangrove Las Varas -
estuary of boat
3 Mar 2011 (06:00 pm-18:20
pm)
P. vivax (VK210)
1.4
EIR: entomological inoculation rate.
EIR: entomological inoculation rate.Entomological inoculation rate (EIR) - The EIR ( Warrell & Gilles 2002 ) was calculated from the product of the
HBR (average of 24 h) and the sporozoite rate at each sampling site where mosquitoes
were found infected with Plasmodium ( Table II ).
DISCUSSION
An important aim of this study was to determine whether An. neivai can
reach fishing canoes and bite fishermen while they are performing their daily
activities. It was possible to calculate the HBR for six samples of continuous 24-h
sampling and for eight samples at peak activity, which indicates that this species
reaches the boats and canoes not by accident, but rather as a result of “habitual”
behaviour.This study reports the presence of An. neivai and An.
albimanus that bite fishermen in their canoes, demonstrating that mosquitoes
can leave the swamp and fly hundreds of metres to bite fishermen. Mosquito activity was
detected up to 200 m offshore and according to the fishermen themselves; mosquitoes can
reach canoes located up to 500-800 m from shore.The natural infection results ( Table II )
showed that three female Anopheles were found infected with P.
vivax . Two (1 An. neivai and 1 An.
albimanus ) were caught landing on fishermen in their canoes. The EIR values
for each site were low, presumably due to the low biting rate observed in the early
hours. Nevertheless, this result, coupled with the HBR in the canoes and mangroves at
peak activity and confirmed by epidemiological data from the area, supports the argument
that fishing is an “occupational” risk factor for contracting malaria.An. neivai peaked at dawn in the canoes, which was not observed at any
of the other sampling sites, even in the mangroves. It is possible that populations of
An. neivai that are present in the mangroves feed at dawn on the
fishermen in their canoes because there are no other humans at that time in the
mangrove. Likewise, canoes concentrate people, which can enhance the attraction of
mosquitoes. There are always between two-five fishermen in each boat. For example, while
some fishermen are approaching the net, the others are removing the fish that have been
caught in it. Fishing nets can weigh more than 200 kg; therefore, at least two people
are required to move them.The dawn peak activity of An. neivai (17.7 m/m/h) coincides with the
boarding of fishermen, who carry out their fishing activities between 05:00 am-04:00 pm.
At the time of boarding and even when they are in their canoes, they are at risk of
being bitten by An. neivai .In this study, An. neivai showed preferences for extradomiciliary
biting activity, but it also showed constant intradomiciliary activity. Although most
Kerteszia species are characterised by exophagic preferences ( Marrelli et al. 2007 ), there have been reports of
some species of this subgenus that prefer anthropic environments over forest
environments. Forattini et al. (1999) found that
Anopheles (K) bellator was four times more abundant indoors than
Anopheles (K) cruzii , which showed an inclination for sylvatic
environments.The few previous studies that have examined the Kerteszia subgenus in
Colombia have identified little or no indoor activity. Quiñones et al. (1984) did not detect indoor activity for Anopheles
(K) pholidotus ( referred to as Anopheles lepidotus ). In
relation to An. (K) neivai , Astaiza et
al. (1988) reported some domiciliary activity on the Pacific Coast during
indoor sampling between 07:00 pm-05:00 am and they detected peak activity at 01:00 am.
Solarte et al. (1996) reported no significant
indoor activity for this species in distinct settlements of the Naya River
(Colombia).It is possible that this species has inherent synanthropic potential or may be seeking
new environments in which to feed due to external pressures, such as decreases of their
original food sources or degradation of their natural environment. Moreover, many
anophelines may show temporary or permanent changes in their biting behaviour in
response to extrinsic factors, such as moon phases, rain, deforestation and the use of
insecticides ( Reddy et al. 2011 ). The levels of
domestication of mosquito species can vary by location and show different degrees of
endophily and endophagy. These differences can be observed in the interactions between
local ecological factors, such as the distance between houses and oviposition sites, the
housing type, the time of year and biological-genetic specific factors such as heredity
and age, which influence biting behaviour. Furthermore, it has been suggested that
important differences in behaviour may indicate that the populations of interest are
part of a species complex ( Rubio-Palis & Curtis
1992 , Rubio-Palis et al. 2013 ).As An. neivai breeds exclusively in the jungle and this species has
exophilic preferences, females must travel between the forests and houses to achieve
their food-oviposition requirements. Thus, the distance between dwellings and the
mangrove forest is a key factor contributing to the development of endophagic behaviour
in this species. Confirming this view, several studies have shown that dwelling closer
to the forest is a risk factor for contracting malaria ( Rozendaal 1992 , Stefani et al. 2011
).The risk of being bitten by An. neivai in the dwellings is exacerbated
because most of the dwellings in the study area are built of wood, have incomplete walls
and lack glass windows. The peak indoor biting activity (06:00 pm-07:00 pm) creates a
risk factor for the local population because they can be bitten by An.
neivai at a time when most of them have not yet gone to bed. Stefani et al. (2011) found that children who go to
bed after 07:00 pm have a higher risk of contracting malaria than those who go to bed
earlier because the latter are protected by bednets at the time of peak anopheline
biting activity.An. neivai was more active at night outdoors than indoors and showed a
bite rate lower than that reported by Astaiza et al.
(1988) , but higher than that reported by Solarte et al. (1996) . An. neivai only showed one peak of
activity (05:00 pm-06:00 pm), but it coincided with a variety of activities around the
home, including chatting with neighbours, sharing work experiences, playing games and
other tasks such as making or repairing fishing nets. The only option for inhabitants to
avoid being bitten is to drive away insects with smoke from fires using the skin of
coconut palms that are plentiful in the area. This measure, although inexpensive, is
problematic because the smoke generated by burning coconut skin irritates the
respiratory system. Furthermore, its effectiveness depends on the availability of this
fruit in the zone and the combustion duration, which averages 15 min.The forest activity of An. neivai has been reported previously ( Solarte et al. 1996 , Astaiza et al. 1988 ). However, this is the first time that biting activity
has been measured for 24 continuous hours in the mangrove forest and related to the
activities of fisherman. An. neivai presented a trimodal pattern of
biting activity and this study has the highest reported biting activity for this
species. Two of the three activity peaks coincided in time (between 06:00 pm-09:00 am
and 09:00 pm-10:00 pm), as described by Solarte et al.
(1996) . The third peak, close to midnight, is reported here for the first
time for this species. At the end of this peak (at 01:00 am), a female An.
neivai infected with P. vivax was captured. An activity
peak was not detected at sunrise. Previous reports ( Solarte et al. 1996 ) have described a small peak of activity for An.
neivai between 06:00 am-07:00 am and studies investigating the subgenus
Kerteszia indicate that this species has two peaks of activity in
sylvatic areas: one at sunrise and another at sunset ( Forattini et al. 1996 , Marrelli et al.
2007 ). All of the peaks of mosquito activity coincided with one or more times
when fishing activities were being performed in the area.Despite the low daytime activity of An. neivai reported in this study,
women and children are primarily at risk of being bitten by this mosquito during the
day, when they enter the mangroves to catch molluscs and crabs. These activities, which
help them pay their school fees, are performed almost every day. They must remain within
the mangrove forest for 3-6 h and are virtually unprotected against mosquitoes and other
bloodsucking insects.Similarly, fishermen are forced to spend several hours at the edge of mangroves as they
set the nets and carefully remove fish that have fallen into them. To repel mosquitoes,
they burn coconut husks or apply oil-derived substances to the skin, which, according to
the fishermen, causes them discomfort and skin irritation.This study has demonstrated a temporal and spatial coincidence between several fishing
activities performed outdoors and peaks of An. neivai biting activity.
This relationship, combined with the detection of infection by
Plasmodium in female mosquitoes caught in canoes, suggests that
An. neivai may be responsible for extradomiciliary transmission of
malaria, mainly in mangroves and canoes. This type of malaria transmission is common in
the Kerteszia subgenus and several of its species have been associated
with malaria transmission in forest environments, which is known as bromeliad-malaria (
Ueno et al. 2007 ). Similarly, Valderrama and Santander (1985) found that 83% of
malaria cases were contracted outside the home in a study on the Bajo Calima, where
An. neivai is abundant.Moreover, it has been suggested for over a decade that this species may be the primary
malaria vector in some areas of the Pacific Colombian Coast, given its strong
association with humans, its high densities, its constant presence in coastal areas (
Astaiza et al. 1988 , Solarte et al. 1996 ) and its natural infection with
Plasmodium ( Carvajal et al.
1989 , Gutiérrez et al. 2008 ).In the department of Nariño, most malaria control strategies have targeted
intradomiciliary mosquitoes through the provision of treated mosquito bednets. Municipal
health services have distributed free mosquito bednets and coverage reaches nearly 100%
of the population. However, this measure is not effective in preventing peri and
extradomiciliary malaria transmission in Nariño. Because Nariño is one of the eight
poorest departments in the country, where 56.1% of its inhabitants are under the poverty
line ( DNP 2011 ), it is likely that most people
in the study area are not accustomed to using commercial repellents because they cannot
afford them. It is suggested that low-cost commercial repellents against malaria be
supplied by the departmental program after implementing an education campaign and
training the community to optimise repellent use.
Authors: R A Wirtz; F Zavala; Y Charoenvit; G H Campbell; T R Burkot; I Schneider; K M Esser; R L Beaudoin; R G Andre Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 1987 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Andrés López-Rubio; Juan Suaza-Vasco; Paula L Marcet; Natalia Ruíz-Molina; Lorenzo Cáceres; Charles Porter; Sandra Uribe Journal: Zootaxa Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 1.091
Authors: Marcela Conde; Paula X Pareja; Lorena I Orjuela; Martha L Ahumada; Sebastian Durán; Jennifer A Jara; Braian A Cañon; Pilar Pérez; John C Beier; Socrates Herrera; Martha L Quiñones Journal: Malar J Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Julio Cesar Padilla-Rodríguez; Mario J Olivera; Martha Liliana Ahumada-Franco; Andrea Elizabeth Paredes-Medina Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nelson Naranjo-Díaz; Mariano Altamiranda; Shirley Luckhart; Jan E Conn; Margarita M Correa Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-08-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Martha L Ahumada; Lorena I Orjuela; Paula X Pareja; Marcela Conde; Diana M Cabarcas; Eliana F G Cubillos; Jorge A Lopez; John C Beier; Sócrates Herrera; Martha L Quiñones Journal: Malar J Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 2.979