Paula Nilda Fergnani1, Adriana Ruggiero1, Soledad Ceccarelli2, Frédéric Menu3, Jorge Rabinovich2. 1. Laboratorio Ecotono, Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche, Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Argentina, San Carlos de BarilocheRío Negro. 2. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina, La PlataBuenos Aires. 3. Laboratory of Biometry and Evolutionary Biology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France, Villeurbanne.
Abstract
We analysed the spatial variation in morphological diversity (MDiv) and species richness (SR) for 91 species of Neotropical Triatominae to determine the ecological relationships between SR and MDiv and to explore the roles that climate, productivity, environmental heterogeneity and the presence of biomes and rivers may play in the structuring of species assemblages. For each 110 km x 110 km-cell on a grid map of America, we determined the number of species (SR) and estimated the mean Gower index (MDiv) based on 12 morphological attributes. We performed bootstrapping analyses of species assemblages to identify whether those assemblages were more similar or dissimilar in their morphology than expected by chance. We applied a multi-model selection procedure and spatial explicit analyses to account for the association of diversity-environment relationships. MDiv and SR both showed a latitudinal gradient, although each peaked at different locations and were thus not strictly spatially congruent. SR decreased with temperature variability and MDiv increased with mean temperature, suggesting a predominant role for ambient energy in determining Triatominae diversity. Species that were more similar than expected by chance co-occurred near the limits of the Triatominae distribution in association with changes in environmental variables. Environmental filtering may underlie the structuring of species assemblages near their distributional limits.
We analysed the spatial variation in morphological diversity (MDiv) and species richness (SR) for 91 species of Neotropical Triatominae to determine the ecological relationships between SR and MDiv and to explore the roles that climate, productivity, environmental heterogeneity and the presence of biomes and rivers may play in the structuring of species assemblages. For each 110 km x 110 km-cell on a grid map of America, we determined the number of species (SR) and estimated the mean Gower index (MDiv) based on 12 morphological attributes. We performed bootstrapping analyses of species assemblages to identify whether those assemblages were more similar or dissimilar in their morphology than expected by chance. We applied a multi-model selection procedure and spatial explicit analyses to account for the association of diversity-environment relationships. MDiv and SR both showed a latitudinal gradient, although each peaked at different locations and were thus not strictly spatially congruent. SR decreased with temperature variability and MDiv increased with mean temperature, suggesting a predominant role for ambient energy in determining Triatominae diversity. Species that were more similar than expected by chance co-occurred near the limits of the Triatominae distribution in association with changes in environmental variables. Environmental filtering may underlie the structuring of species assemblages near their distributional limits.
Biological diversity may be quantified in terms of both the species richness (SR) and
variety of forms, e.g., the morphological diversity (MDiv) ( Roy & Foote 1997 ). Different morphologies may be associated with
different functional aspects of ecological significance, including niche differentiation (
Gatz 1979 ), foraging niche and activity ( Gilber 1985 ) and diet diversity ( Collar et al. 2005 ). SR and phenotypic variation might
depend on species interactions, environmental variability and random processes [for
reviews, see Chesson (2000) , Hubbell (2001) and Venner et al.
(2011) ]. A strong relationship between MDiv and SR associated with ecological
factors may suggest a major role for niche partitioning ( Patterson et al. 2003 , Safi et al. 2011
). However, the association between MDiv and SR remains controversial.There is evidence to suggest that a variety of morphologies may be a positive function of
the number of species [e.g., in fish ( Gatz 1979 ),
mammals ( Shepherd & Kelt 1999 ) and birds (
Cumming & Child 2009 )] or taxonomic
diversity [e.g., in plants such as Desmidiales ( Neustupa
et al. 2009 )]. However, the spatial congruence between richness and
morphological patterns may not be perfect, as in the case of certain mammals ( Stevens et al. 2006 , Arita & Figueroa 1999 ). A weak positive correlation between richness and
MDiv has been reported in marine gastropods ( Roy et al.
2001 ) and a negative relationship has been observed in North American mammals (
Shepherd 1998 ). Discrepancies in the association
between morphological and taxonomic diversity have been documented for evolutionary time
scales in blastozoan echinoderms and trilobites ( Foote
1993 ). This evidence has led to the concept that although morphological and
taxonomic diversity are non-independent estimators of biological diversity, they cannot be
considered direct surrogates for one another.Few of the aforementioned examples include invertebrates. For example, Diniz-Filho et al. (2010) did not find any reports that
focused on morphological traits or MDiv related to SR in insects; analyses have been
restricted to wing size/geographic range size ( Rundle et
al. 2007 ), body size/abundance ( Siqueira et al.
2008 ) and body size/altitudinal and latitudinal patterns ( Brehm & Fiddler 2004 , Kubota et al.
2007 ). Here, we evaluate the congruence between spatial patterns of variation in
Triatominae SR and MDiv at the continental scale in North and South America.Members of the Triatominae (Heteroptera: Reduviidae) are insect vectors of Chagas disease
and consist of 140 species, of which 128 are found in the Neotropics (6 of the 7 species of
the Triatoma rubrofasciata complex are found only in Asia and six species
of the genus Linchosteus are found in India) ( Schofield & Galvão 2009 ). The Neotropical triatomines show
relatively high variability in body size, morphology and geographical range and inhabit
diverse habitats ( Galíndez-Girón et al. 1998 ,
Bargues et al. 2010 , Patterson & Guhl 2010 ). Populations of T.
infestans show large changes in their wing morphometrics associated with
habitat type (e.g., structures associated with chickens vs. goat or pig corrals) ( Schachter-Broide et al. 2004 ). Triatomines have, with
a few exceptions, an haematophagous feeding regime mainly based on the blood of birds and
mammals ( Carcavallo et al. 1998b , Rabinovich et al. 2011 ). Our objective was to explain
the large scale spatial patterns of MDiv and SR of Neotropical triatomine species in terms
of environmental gradients to complement the analysis performed by Diniz-Filho et al. (2013) and account for the distribution and SR
patterns of Triatominae. First, we addressed the issue of whether there is spatial
congruence between MDiv and SR patterns. We then considered multiple environmental
variables that could plausibly explain MDiv and SR patterns on a large geographical scale
by exploring the role of the climate-productivity hypothesis and two (local and regional)
versions of the heterogeneity hypotheses to account for MDiv and SR patterns, as
follows.(i) The climatic/productivity hypotheses [ sensu
Field et al. (2009) ] explain how climate, acting
either directly through physiological effects or indirectly through resource productivity
or biomass, is the primary determinant of large-scale richness patterns. The water-energy
hypothesis proposes the interaction between water and energy as fundamental to determining
the capacity of environments to support a certain number of species and the productivity
hypothesis assumes that an increase in primary productivity promotes an increase in the
abundance of species at the consumer trophic level that may favour species coexistence
[examples for insects include Hawkins et al. (2003)
and Field et al. (2009) ]. Given that these
mechanisms could also favour the coexistence of high morphological variety, we predict that
SR and MDiv will increase with the total amount of water-energy available and/or in regions
of high primary productivity.(ii) The environmental heterogeneity hypothesis assumes that high spatial heterogeneity in
any topographic, climatic or habitat component of the environment promotes high SR because
resources are more readily subdivided in heterogeneous habitats, thereby leading to greater
specialisation and the coexistence of a larger number of species ( Field et al. 2009 ). Phenotypic differentiation between populations and
species may be directly caused by differences in the environments they inhabit and
resources they consume, as differentiation is mediated through a mechanism of natural
selection that pulls the phenotypic means of two or more populations toward different
adaptive peaks ( Schluter 2000 ). This mechanism
would result in greater functional diversity with increasing spatial and/or temporal
environmental heterogeneity ( Safi et al. 2011 ). We
predict that SR and MDiv will increase with climatic, habitat and topographic
heterogeneity. We also explored the role of the presence of biomes and major rivers as
regional features that could potentially contribute to SR and MDiv patterns. Specifically,
major biomes may be associated with convergence in community structure (e.g., Holarctic
mammals) ( Rodríguez et al. 2006 ) and major rivers
may act as barriers that shape distributional patterns in vertebrate and invertebrate taxa
( Turchetto-Zolet et al. 2013 ); thus, the increased
habitat heterogeneity near a major river may have an indirect influence on the diversity of
triatomines.Factors invoked in the statement of each aforementioned hypothesis are not necessarily
independent and could theoretically interact as selective pressures to account for
concurrent spatial patterns in terms of SR and MDiv. Nonetheless, the association between
morphology and environment should not necessarily parallel SR-environment relationships due
to the occurrence of random processes (e.g., genetic drift) and phyletic and developmental
constraints upon evolutionary change that may also influence the phenotypes of species [see
Gould and Lewontin (1979) for discussion and
examples].On the other hand, environmental filtering and species sorting may promote the persistence
of only a narrow spectrum of traits under specific environmental conditions, leading to the
coexistence of more similar species than expected by chance ( Keddy 1992 , Leibold 1998 ).
Chase (2007) suggested that if only a small
number of species could persist under harsh environmental conditions, this could eliminate
(filter) a large proportion of the regional source species pool, leading to a higher
similarity among communities. In contrast, as many species can tolerate benign
environments, such conditions will result in considerable unpredictability in their species
composition ( Chase 2007 ). In addition, the
environment can enhance divergence for certain traits, thereby allowing for the coexistence
of species that are more dissimilar than expected by chance ( Podani 2009 ). Here, we examined for the first time whether there are
assemblages of Triatominae species that are more similar (or dissimilar) in their
morphology than expected by chance and, if so, we determined whether they are associated
with variations in environmental conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Data sources - A climatic and geographic database of 115 triatomine
species (Supplementary data 1, Table SI ) was
compiled (by author JR) from a public domain source ( Carcavallo et al. 1998a ) and digitised at a 0.1º x 0.1º resolution; this
database was used for the analysis of species distribution ranges. From this database we
selected 91 species for which we had additional morphological measurement data, which
were compiled from Lent et al. (1998) . We
divided the American continent occupied by triatomines into equal-area grid cells of 110
km x 110 km using an equal area Mollweide projection in ArcGis 9.2 ( ESRI 2007 ); coastal cells that included < 50%
land surface were excluded, resulting in a grid of 2,023 cells. A species was recorded
as present in each 110 km x 110 km grid cell if it was present in at least one of the
original 0.1º x 0.1º coordinates. We estimated SR based on the same 91 species selected
for in the analysis of MDiv by counting the number of species present in each 110 km x
110 km grid cell. Although it is well known that diversity-environment relationships are
not scale-invariant, the 10,000 km 2 resolution represents the minimum
spatial scale at which the predominance of environmental predictors may account for
diversity gradients ( Belmaker & Jetz 2011 ).
Diniz-Filho et al. (2013) used this same grid
size for a biogeographical analysis of triatomines and thus our scale selection allows
for a direct comparison with that study.
TABLE SI
List of the 91 species studied
Alberprosenia goyovargasi
Triatoma circummaculata
Belminus costaricensis
Triatoma costalimai
Belminus herreri
Triatoma delpontei
Belminus laportei
Triatoma dimidiata
Belminus peruvianus
Triatoma dispar
Bolbodera scabrosa
Triatoma eratyrusiforme
Cavernicola pilosa
Triatoma flavida
Dipetalogaster maximus
Triatoma garciabesi
Eratyrus cuspidatus
Triatoma gerstaeckeri
Eratyrus mucronatus
Triatoma guasayana
Mepraia spinolai
Triatoma guazu
Microtriatoma borbai
Triatoma incrassata
Microtriatoma trinidadensis
Triatoma indictiva
Panstrongylus geniculatus
Triatoma infestans
Panstrongylus guentheri
Triatoma lecticularia
Panstrongylus howardi
Triatoma lenti
Panstrongylus lignarus
Triatoma limai
Panstrongylus lutzi
Triatoma longipennis
Panstrongylus megistus
Triatoma maculata
Panstrongylus rufotuberculatus
Triatoma matogrossensis
Panstrongylus tupynambai
Triatoma mazzotti
Parabelminus carioca
Triatoma melanocephala
Parabelminus yurupucu
Triatoma melanosoma
Paratriatoma hirsuta
Triatoma neotomae
Psammolestes arthuri
Triatoma nigromaculata
Psammolestes coreodes
Triatoma nitida
Psammolestes tertius
Triatoma oliveirai
Rhodnius brethesi
Triatoma pallidipennis
Rhodnius dalessandroi
Triatoma patagonica
Rhodnius domesticus
Triatoma peninsularis
Rhodnius ecuadoriensis
Triatoma petrochii
Rhodnius nasutus
Triatoma phyllosoma
Rhodnius neglectus
Triatoma picturata
Rhodnius neivai
Triatoma platensis
Rhodnius pallescens
Triatoma protracta
Rhodnius paraensis
Triatoma pseudomaculata
Rhodnius pictipes
Triatoma recurva
Rhodnius prolixus
Triatoma rubida
Rhodnius robustus
Triatoma rubrovaria
Rhodnius stali
Triatoma ryckmani
Triatoma arthurneivai
Triatoma sanguisuga
Triatoma brasiliensis
Triatoma sinaloensis
Triatoma breyeri
Triatoma sordida
Triatoma bruneri
Triatoma tibiamaculata
Triatoma carcavalloi
Triatoma vitticeps
Triatoma carrioni
Morphology data - We used a total of 12 morphological descriptors,
which are commonly used for the classification of triatomine species based on external
morphology: (i) total length, (ii) pronotum width, (iii) abdomen width, (iv)
anteocular-postocular ratio, (v) eye dorsal width/synthlipsis ratio, (vi) 2nd-1st
antennal segment ratio, (vii) 3rd-1st antennal segment ratio, (viii) 4th-1st antennal
segment ratio, (ix) 2nd-1st rostrum segment ratio, (x) 3rd-1st rostrum segment ratio,
(xi) length head/pronotum ratio and (12) length/width of head ratio. Data were compiled
from Lent et al. (1998) and the definition of
variables and the measurement methodology were used according to Lent and Wygodzinsky (1979) . Measurements on five males and five
females were averaged for each species, although fewer specimens were available in
certain cases. The geographic distribution and morphological measurements for each of
the 91 species are available from dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.653959 .Environmental variables - Climatic/productivity hypothesis - Actual
evapotranspiration (AET) is a surrogate of primary productivity that has been used to
study richness patterns in Triatominae ( Diniz-Filho et
al. 2013 ). Data on AET were obtained from the Atlas of the Biosphere (
atlas.sage.wisc.edu/ ) at a resolution of 0.5º x 0.5º as described in
Willmott and Matsuura (2001) . We projected
the AET data onto the Mollweide projection to extract mean values for each 110 km x 100
km cell using ArcGIS 9.2 ( ESRI 2007 ).As surrogates for the total amount of energy available, we used the following: (i)
potential evapotranspiration (PET) extracted for each 110 km x 100 km cell from the
agroclimatic database of the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization via the
software New_LocClim v. 1.10 ( Gommes et al. 2004
) (available from: ftp://ext-ftp.fao.org/SD/Reserved/Agromet/New_LocClim/ ) and (ii) the
mean annual temperature (T mean ) obtained from the WorldClim v. 1.4 database
at a resolution of 30 s ( Hijmans et al. 2005 ).
Water availability was represented by the annual precipitation (PREC annual )
as obtained from the WorldClim v. 1.4 database at a resolution of 30 s ( Hijmans et al. 2005 ). We projected the T
mean and PREC annual data onto the Mollweide projection to
extract a mean value for each 110 km x 100 km cell using ArcGIS 9.2 ( ESRI 2007 ).The environmental heterogeneity hypothesis - We used the mean (Altitude
mean ) and standard deviation (Altitude std ) in elevation as
indicators of meso-climatic and topographic heterogeneity, respectively. Elevation data
were obtained from the WorldClim v. 1.4 database at a resolution of 30 s ( Hijmans et al. 2005 ). Habitat heterogeneity was
derived from ecoregions maps ( Olson et al. 2001
) projected onto the Molleweide projection. We counted the number of ecoregions (ECO
numb ) in each 110 km x 110 km grid cell to estimate the habitat
heterogeneity. Energy variation was represented by the inter-annual coefficient of
variation in temperature (TEMP cv ) as provided by Hay et al. (2006) . Variation in the water availability was
represented by the inter-annual coefficient of variation in precipitation (PRECcv) and
Colwell’s precipitation predictability index (CPI) ( Colwell 1974 ) calculated based on the average monthly precipitation. PRECcv
was estimated from the 0.5º x 0.5º time series from 1901-2000 of the global gridded
climatology data produced by the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia,
United Kingdon ( New et al. 1999 ) derived from
interpolated meteorological station data. We projected the TEMP cv , CPI and
PREC cv data onto the Mollweide projection to extract a mean value for each
110 km x 100 km cell using ArcGIS 9.2 ( ESRI 2007
).The geographic distribution of biomes was obtained from Olson et al. (2001) (Supplementary data 1, Fig. S1 ) and the minimum distance of each cell in the grid map to major
rivers (River dist ) was estimated from the ESRI Data & Maps Media Kit
(Global Imagery Shaded Relief of North and South America included in ArcGis 9.2)
projected onto the Molleweide system.
Fig. S1
: map of biomes used in the present analysis (Olson et al. 2001). Maps are
in Molweide equal-area projection. DXS: deserts and xeric shrublands; FGS:
flooded grasslands and savannas; MFWS: mediterranean forests, woodlands and
scrub; MGS: montane grasslands and shrublands; Te BMF: temperate broadleaf and
mixed forests; Te CF: temperate conifer forests; Te GSS: temperate grasslands,
savannas and shrublands; Tr-ST CF: tropical and subtropical coniferous forests;
Tr-ST DBF: tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forests; Tr-ST GSS: trop and
subt grasslands savannas and shrublands; Tr-ST MBF: tropical and subtropical
moist broadleaf forests.
Estimation of MDiv - We estimated the mean MDiv in each grid cell using
the mean Gower Index ( GI ) ( Gower
1971 ), which indicates the mean dissimilarity between pairs of coexisting
species based on attributes measured on interval and ratio scales ( Podani & Schemera 2006 ). The
GI
, which ranges from 0 (complete similarity between species pairs) to 1 (complete
dissimilarity between species pairs), was calculated as:where S
is the partial similarity of a continuous variable (trait) i for
the j-k pair of species and is defined as S
=|X
– X
|/ [max{X
} – min{X
}] and W
is the weight for variable i for the j-k pair.
W
= 0 if, for variable i , X
or X
have missing values. Otherwise, W
= 1. In our calculations, we always used W
= 1. The traits ( i ) were the 12 triatomine morphological
descriptors.For each cell, we computed GI
for each combination of species pairs and then summed the values of all pairs of
species combinations and divided this number by the total number of species pairs in
each cell to produce the GI and standard deviation (
GI
std ) of the GI. GI was our estimation of MDiv per cell and
is independent of the number of species being compared; thus, the GI
can be used to compare across grid cells with different SR values. We mapped the MDiv
and the coefficient of variation in MDiv (MDiv cv ), estimated as:Phylogenetic effects should be taken into account in these types of analysis ( Harvey & Pagel 1991 ); however, few phylogenetic
trees of Triatominae are available and these do not cover all of the 91 species studied
herein. Even the partial lists of species analysed in the existing phylogenies are
usually disjointed sets ( Carcavallo et al. 1999
) and thus, we did not apply a phylogenetic comparative method.Data analyses - Assessment of non-random species associations - To
assess the existence of non-random species co-occurrence patterns at the local scale
(i.e., for each of the 110 km x 110 km grid cells) for each level of observed SR, we
simulated 10,000 random species assemblages by resampling species with replacements
(bootstrap randomisation) from the total pool of 91 species. The probability (
Pr ) of each species to be resampled each time was proportional to
its geographic range ( Pr = number of grid cells occupied by each
species/number of total cells in the grid map) and the GI was
calculated for each of the 10,000 random species assemblages. From the bootstrap
randomisation we estimated a mean GI and the 0.025 and 0.975 quantiles
for each grid cell with its corresponding richness value. GI values
less than the 0.025 quantile indicated that the dissimilarity between pairs of
coexisting species was lower than expected by chance, whereas GI values
greater than the 0.975 quantile indicated that dissimilarity between pairs of coexisting
species was larger than expected by chance and we interpreted these as evidence of a
non-random association of species.Assessment of environmental associations - The association between MDiv
and environmental variables was assessed using a generalised linear model (GLM) without
interactions and normality of error. A binomial distribution of errors was used to model
the association between environmental variables and the presence/absence of significant
structures in the organisation of species assemblages.We used glmulti , an R package by Calcagno and Mazancourt (2010) , for automated multi-model selection to find
the best subset of candidate environmental models supported by the data; this package is
based on Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) ( Diniz-Filho et al. 2008 ). We applied the package’s default method
(exhaustive screening of all candidate models) to find the best explanatory models from
all possible unique models involving our list of environmental variables. Out of the
total possible models obtained, we chose a subset of models where each predictor (or
term) had a correlation of less than 0.8 from each other to reduce multicollinearity.
From this subset, those models that differed by less than two AIC units from the model
with the minimum AIC value were selected as the best subset of candidate models. The
most parsimonious model (the one with the minimum number of predictors) was selected
from that subset of best candidate models as the “final” model for biological
interpretation.The autocorrelation of variables across the geographic space is an inherent property of
most ecological data and often complicates the statistical testing of hypotheses by
standard methods; i.e., autocorrelation usually inflates type I errors and may result in
model instability ( Diniz-Filho et al. 2003 ). We
assessed the effects of the spatial structure of variables on the performance of our
environmental models (Supplementary data 2).Data analysis is complicated due to the difficulty in establishing a direct causal
relationship between variables. It is difficult to disentangle whether any environmental
variable associated with MDiv or SR is a direct driver of the spatial variation or if
such an association is driven by a third variable that is also spatially structured (
Diniz-Filho et al. 2003 ). To partially
overcome this problem, we conducted a partial regression analysis ( Borcard et al. 1992 ) of SR and MDiv (Supplementary
data 3).
RESULTS
S patial variation in the MDiv and SR at the continental scale - Both
SR and MDiv followed a latitudinal gradient, which suggests overall spatial congruence
between these two facets of triatomine species diversity. However, SR increased in
tropical savannahs and shrublands in South America ( Fig.
1B , Supplementary data 1, Fig. S1 ),
showing peaks in central and northeastern Brazil, central and northwestern Argentina and
northern latitudes of Venezuela. MDiv increased in the tropics and decreased in
extra-tropical latitudes towards the northern and southern distributional limits of the
Neotropical triatomines ( Fig. 1A ), showing
localised peaks in restricted regions of Brazil, Colombia and eastern Peru and Uruguay.
The high SR in subtropical latitudes in Argentina is associated with low MDiv and the
same trend was observed at the limit between the southern USA and Mexico ( Fig. 1A , B ,
Supplementary data 4, Figs S5 , S6 ). The highest local variability in MDiv
cv ( Fig. 1C ) was observed within
the Amazon Basin, coinciding with low SR and high MDiv (compare Fig. 1A-C ).
Fig. 1
spatial variation. A: morphological diversity (MDiv); B: species richness;
C: coefficient of variation in MDiv. Scale units in A correspond to mean Gower
index values, which run between 0 (maximum similarity) and 1 (minimum
similarity), and in B to species number. Maps are in Mollweide equal-area
projection.
Fig. S7
the geographical distribution of species that were included in continental
initiatives to control the main vectors of Chagas disease [mentioned in Guhl
(2009)] overlapped onto the spatial patterns of triatomine species richness (SR).
The distributional range of each species is shown as a shaded area. x-y graphs
show the proportion of cells in each richness class recorded on the continent that
is encompassed by the geographical range of each species.
Fig. S8
the geographical distribution of species that were included in continental
initiatives to control the main vectors of Chagas disease [mentioned in Guhl
(2009)] overlapped onto the spatial patterns of morphological diversity (MDiv).
The distributional range of each species is shown as a shaded area. x-y graphs
show the proportion of cells in three (arbitrarily defined) morphological
diversity classes recorded on the continent that is encompassed by the
geographical range of each species.
Associations between MDiv, SR and environmental variables - The
environmental models ( Table I ) accounted for a
greater proportion of the variation in MDiv (R 2 = 0.73) than in SR (R
2 = 0.46). The MDiv data supported two environmental models as being
equally likely and both models had T mean as the most significant predictor (
Table I ). Although neither AET nor PREC
annual remained in either model, there was a tendency for MDiv to increase
with an increase in the PREC cv in Model 1 and precipitation predictability
(CPI in both models, Table I ).
TABLE I
Environmental models selected after the application of multi-model
selection criteria to account for the geographic variation in morphological
diversity (MDiv) and species richness (SR)
MDiv
Model 1
Model 2
SR
Environmental variables
b
p
b
p
b
p
Potential evapotranspiration
-
-
0.024
0.105
0.154
0.000
Mean annual temperature
0.477
0.000
0.467
0.000
-
-
Mean altitude
0.141
0.000
0.139
0.000
-
-
Mean precipitation
-
-
-
-
-0.295
0.000
Actual evapotranspiration
-
-
-
-
-
-
Colwell’s precipitation predictability
index
0.163
0.000
0.173
0.000
-
-
Mean standard deviation altitude
0.098
0.000
0.109
0.000
0.103
0.000
Coefficient of variation in temperature
-
-
-
-
-0.392
0.000
Coefficient of variation in precipitation
0.025
0.008
-
-
-0.197
0.000
Number of ecoregions
-0.065
0.000
-0.068
0.000
-
-
Distance of each cell in the grid map to major
rivers
-0.126
0.000
-0.124
0.000
-0.108
0.000
Deserts and xeric shrublands
-0.242
0.000
-0.240
0.000
-0.226
0.000
Flooded grasslands and savannas
0.370
0.002
0.364
0.003
-0.264
0.132
Mediterranean forests, woodlands and scrub
0.105
0.423
0.140
0.287
-0.840
0.000
Montane grasslands and shrublands
-0.093
0.355
-0.079
0.427
-0.436
0.000
Temperate broadleaf and mixed forests
-0.962
0.000
-0.968
0.000
-0.623
0.000
Temperate conifer forests
-0.855
0.000
-0.877
0.000
-0.663
0.000
Temperate grasslands, savannas and
shrublands
-0.503
0.000
-0.498
0.000
-0.268
0.000
Tropical and subtropical grasslands savannas and
shrublands
0.200
0.000
0.199
0.000
0.741
0.000
Tropical and subtropical coniferous forests
-0.319
0.000
-0.322
0.000
-0.505
0.000
Tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf
forests
0.019
0.756
0.025
0.685
-0.127
0.136
Tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf
forests
0.317
0.000
0.316
0.000
0.092
0.018
R 2
0.73
0.73
0.46
b : estimated beta regression coefficients; p
: probability level; R
: coefficient of determination of the whole model adjusted by degrees of
freedom.
b : estimated beta regression coefficients; p
: probability level; R
: coefficient of determination of the whole model adjusted by degrees of
freedom.MDiv increased with Altitude mean and high topographic heterogeneity
(Altitude std ), but decreased with high local habitat heterogeneity (ECO
numb ) and River dist ( Table
I ). SR tended to increase in hot and dry regions of the continent
[characterised by high energy (PET) and low water availability (PREC annual
)], but decreased in sites with high variability in TEMP cv , which is the
strongest predictor of triatomine richness ( Table
I ). The tendency for SR to increase in sites with low PREC cv was
weak ( Table I ). SR also increased in sites
with high topographic heterogeneity (Altitude std ) and decreased with River
dist ( Table I ), although the
local habitat heterogeneity (ECO numb ) did not remain in the final
models.The biomes were also significant predictors of the variation in MDiv and SR.
Extra-tropical temperate biomes, desert habitats and coniferous forests were associated
with low MDiv and SR. Tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannahs and shrublands as
well as moist broadleaf forests were associated with high MDiv and/or SR. In the flooded
savannahs and grasslands, low SR but high MDiv values were observed ( Fig. 2 , Table
I ).
Fig. 2
association between biomes and morphological diversity (MDiv) (A) and
species richness (SR) (B), resulting from the final best model selected (see
Materials and Methods and Table I). Biomes associated with an increase in MDiv
or SR, after controlling for other climatic variables (Table I), are shown in
black. Biomes associated with a decrease in MDiv and SR are shown in gray.
Biomes that do not show a significant association with MDiv and SR are shown in
diagonal lines. Maps are in Mollweide equal-area projection.
The low-to-moderate values for spatial autocorrelation that remained in the residuals of
MDiv and SR indicated that the estimation of the regression coefficients was not
seriously affected by the existence of spatial autocorrelation in our original data
(Supplementary data 2, Fig. S2 ). The partial
regression analysis revealed that a greater proportion of MDiv (66%) than SR
(approximately 33%) was explained by spatially structured variation in the environmental
variables. A lower proportion of the variation in MDiv (7%) and SR (13%) was explained
by local environmental variation independent of space. Approximately 20% of the
variation in SR was explained by spatially structured environmental variables that were
not included in our models ( Fig. 3 ).
Fig. S2
spatial correlograms for (A) morphological diversity and (B) species richness
(SR) (solid circles) and residuals (open circles) of morphological diversity (A)
and SR (B) after fitting the environmental models shown on Table I (main text).
AIC: Akaike’s information criterion.
Fig. 3
partition of variation in morphological diversity (MDiv) and species
richness (SR) a: local environmental effects independent of space; b: regional
spatially structured environmental variation (i.e. shared variation between
environment and space); c: spatial effects independent of environment; d:
unexplained variation (see Supplementary data 2 for detailed explanations of
methods and results).
The structuring of MDiv in local (110 km x 110 km) species assemblages with
different SR - The relationship between SR and MDiv examined in the absence
of geographical context followed a funnel-like shape, suggesting greater variation in
MDiv in low SR assemblages rather than high SR ones ( Fig. 4 ). MDiv values above the upper 0.975 or below the lower 0.025
quantiles (i.e., outside the limits of the lines shown in Fig. 4 ) suggested a non-random structuring, which appeared only in certain
restricted regions across the continent ( Fig. 5
).
Fig. 4
association between morphological diversity (MDiv) with species richness
(SR). The broken line indicates the mean value in ecological diversity obtained
after randomisation (see text). Upper and lower lines correspond to 0.025 and
0.0975 quantiles. Points enclosed within the upper and bottom lines correspond
to observed values of mean Gower index ( GI ) as expected by
chance. Points above the 0.025 and below the 0.0975 quantiles correspond to the
observed mean GI values that identify statistically
significant deviations from chance of the morphological similarities and
dissimilarities, respectively.
Fig. 5
geographic location of 110 km x 110 km cells with non-random species
assemblages. A: morphological diversity (MDiv) lower than expected by chance;
B: MDiv greater than expected by chance. Maps are in Mollweide equal-area
projection.
The structure of MDiv in local species assemblages relative to environmental
variables - Local assemblages composed of species more similar in MDiv than
expected by chance were clustered in open habitats (grasslands, savannahs, deserts and
shrublands). In South America, this area covered much of the biogeographical units known
as the Monte Desert and the southern parts of the Chaco and Espinal in Argentina; in
North America, the region overlapped with the majority of the Xerophytic province in
México [see Cabrera and Willink (1980) for
definitions of biogeographical units]. In general, these were regions of low MDiv and
located towards the northern and southern limits of the distribution of triatomine
species ( Figs 1 , 5 ). The species assemblages composed of those more dissimilar in MDiv than
expected by chance occurred in closed habitats (moist broadleaf forest in the Amazonia),
which harboured high MDiv and mainly corresponded to the central areas of the overall
distribution of the Triatominae ( Figs 1 , 5 ).Environmental variables were best associated with the occurrence of species that are
morphologically more similar than expected by chance (McFadden’s pseudo r-squared for
binomial regression models = 0.43) ( Table II )
than with the occurrence of species morphologically more dissimilar than expected by
chance (McFadden’s pseudo r-squared = 0.15) ( Table
II ).
TABLE II
Environmental models resulting from multi-model selection criteria to
account for the presence of structure in the organisation of local species
assemblages with respect to morphological diversity (MDiv)
MDiv lower than expected by chance
MDiv greater than expected by chance
Environmental variables
b
p
b
p
Constant
-4.012
0.000
-5.389
0.000
Potential evapotranspiration
-0.556
0.001
-
-
Mean annual temperature
0.693
0.002
5.420
0.000
Mean altitude
-
-
-
-
Mean precipitation
-6.26
0.000
-
-
Actual evapotranspiration
-
-
-
-
Colwell’s precipitation predictability
index
-2.712
0.000
-
-
Mean standard deviation altitude
0.552
0.006
-
-
Coefficient of variation in temperature
-
-
-
-
Coefficient of variation in precipitation
-5.628
0.000
-
-
Number of ecoregions
-
-
-
-
Distance of each cell in the grid map to major
rivers
-
-
-2.033
0.011
Rho
0.43
0.15
b : coefficient that indicates the magnitude of the
association; p : probability level; Rho: McFadden’s pseudo
r-squared (between 0.2 and 0.4 are indicative of a very good fit).
b : coefficient that indicates the magnitude of the
association; p : probability level; Rho: McFadden’s pseudo
r-squared (between 0.2 and 0.4 are indicative of a very good fit).In the GLM analysis, the assemblages with species that are more similar than expected by
chance were associated with high T mean , low PET and PREC mean ,
low PREC cv , low precipitation predictability (CPI) and high topographic
heterogeneity (Altitude std ) ( Table
II ). However, after accounting for the effect of spatial autocorrelation in
the data (Supplementary data 3, Fig. S3 ), the
effect of T mean was not statistically significant (Supplementary data 3,
Table SII ).
Fig. S3
spatial correlograms for morphological diversity (MDiv) and species richness
(SR) (solid circles) and residuals (open circles) after fitting the spatial models
to MDiv (A) and SR (B) and full models that combined environmental predictors in
Table I (main text) and spatial descriptors obtained from spatial eigenvector
mapping to MDiv (C) and SR (D). AIC: Akaike’s information criterion.
TABLE SII
Spatial generalised linear mixed model to account for the presence of
structure in the organisation of local species assemblages with respect to
morphological diversity (MDiv)
MDiv lower than expected by chance
MDiv greater than expected by chance
Environmental variables
b
p
b
p
Constant
-3.217
0.000
-5.397
0.000
Potential evapotranspiration
-0.346
0.000
-
-
Mean annual temperature
0.175
0.345
4.839
0.001
Mean altitude
-
-
-
-
Mean precipitation
-3.336
0.000
-
-
Actual evapotranspiration
-
-
-
-
Colwell’s precipitation predictability index
-2.882
0.000
-
-
Mean standard deviation altitude
0.603
0.000
-
-
Coefficient of variation in temperature
-
-
-
-
Coefficient of variation in precipitation
-3.531
0.000
-
-
Number of ecoregions
-
-
-
-
Distance of each cell in the grid map to major
rivers
-
-
-2.698
0.012
b : coefficients that indicates the magnitude of the association;
p : the probability level.
DISCUSSION
Geographical patterns in MDiv and SR: are they spatially congruent? -
The SR of Neotropical triatomines showed a latitudinal pattern of variation, in
agreement with previous findings ( Rodriguero &
Gorla 2004 , Diniz-Filho et al. 2013 );
MDiv also followed a latitudinal gradient, suggesting an overall spatial congruence
between these two facets of species diversity. However, their spatial congruence is far
from perfect; for example, there were regions in tropical and subtropical latitudes in
Argentina and Brazil where peaks in SR were not paralleled by peaks in MDiv and the
increase in SR observed at the limit between the southern USA and Mexico was not
paralleled by an increase in MDiv.Spatial incongruence between components of biodiversity has been previously reported for
the taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity of birds ( Devictor et al. 2010 ), SR and MDiv in gastropods ( Roy et al. 2001 ) and between richness and
functional diversity in mammals ( Safi et al.
2011 ). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to elucidate
this type of relationship in insects at the continental scale and we demonstrated that
for the triatomines, SR and MDiv cannot be considered surrogates for one another.The relationship between environmental factors and triatomine diversity
- Our results offer only partial support for the idea that hypotheses of
environmental factors previously invoked to account for the spatial variation in SR may
also be extended to explain the variation in MDiv ( Meynard et al. 2011 ). The proportion of the spatial variation explained by
environmental factors in triatomines was higher for MDiv than for SR patterns. After
controlling for covariation with other environmental variables and regional effects
(e.g., the presence of biomes and rivers), triatomine SR increased with a decrease in
temporal variability in temperature (TEMP cv ), whereas MDiv increased with
an increase in T mean . The predominance of these energy-related variables
accounting for triatomine SR patterns is in agreement with the results of Diniz-Filho et al. (2013) regarding triatomine
richness. Rodriguero and Gorla (2004) also
analysed the species-energy hypothesis using 118 triatomine species and found that there
was a positive monotonic relationship between SR and mean annual land surface
temperature (which they used as a surrogate of available energy).These data on Neotropical Triatominae are an exception to previous evidence suggesting
that water or water-energy variables are strongly and positively associated with
richness in warm climates ( Hawkins et al. 2003
). SR was negatively associated with the total amount of PREC annual and the
temporal variability in PREC cv and was not associated with AET, which
contradicts the predictions of the productivity hypothesis. The stronger effect of
ambient energy on triatomine SR is presumably mediated through physiological constraints
that influence the geographic distribution of insects ( Addo-Bediakko et al. 2000 , Diniz-Filho et
al. 2013 ).In contrast to SR, we found that an increases in the temporal PREC cv and
predictability (CPI) promoted an increase in MDiv, indirectly supporting the notion that
temporal environmental variation may induce phenotypic differentiation ( Schluter 2000 ) and an increase in functional
diversity as observed in mammals ( Safi et al.
2011 ). Such environmental variability could result in temporal niche
partitioning, thereby increasing the variation of biological traits across species (
Chesson & Huntly 1997 , Venner et al. 2011 ). However, the harshness of a
variable environment may select against the coexistence of a high number of species [see
Cohen (2004) for further discussion].Our study confirms that topographic and habitat heterogeneity play secondary roles in
accounting for species diversity gradients on a large geographic scale ( Field et al. 2009 ). On the other hand, large-scale
differences in climatic, vegetation, physiognomy and soil conditions that influence the
structuring of species assemblages across biomes ( Rodríguez et al. 2006 ) may underlie the regional associations of triatomineSR and MDiv with the presence of biomes.The variety of “rules” in the structuring of triatomine species assemblages
- The funnel-like relationship between triatomine SR and MDiv outside of a
geographic context conforms well with similar results for other species, for which
functional diversity was found to be independent of SR ( Laliberté & Legendre 2010 ). At the resolution used here, random species
assemblages predominated (i.e., most of the MDiv values fell inside the 95% confidence
interval under the null hypothesis of a random pattern). Nonetheless, the co-occurrence
of species more similar (or dissimilar) in their morphology than expected by chance was
observed in certain regions, also suggesting that the structuring of triatomine species
assemblages at the continental scale might be governed by different underlying
processes. Caution is needed when interpreting our results because the detection of
structuring patterns may depend on the spatial scale of analysis ( Gomez et al. 2010 ) and size of the species pool used for
randomisation ( de Bello 2012 ). One limitation
in our study may be that we restricted our analyses to one spatial scale of resolution
(110 km x 110 km) and used a single species pool involving the entire set of studied
species. With these two potential limitations in mind, we consider the following
alternative mechanisms that could provide an explanation for our results.The co-occurrence of species that are more similar in their functional diversity than
expected by chance has often been interpreted as evidence of environmental filtering
acting at a regional scale within temperate latitudes ( Petchey et al. 2007 ). It is suggestive that the two triatomine assemblages
with species more similar than expected by chance occur at two separate xeric regions in
North and South America that share similar environmental conditions (high temperature
and low precipitation) and biogeographic history ( Roig
et al. 2009 ). These xeric environmental conditions may have filtered out from
the regional source pool those triatomine species that have the morphological attributes
to tolerate such xeric conditions ( Keddy 1992 ,
Chase 2007 ). This possibility is reinforced
by Triatominae phylogenies ( Hypsa et al. 2002 ,
Silva de Paula et al. 2005 ) showing that, at
least for the Triatomine tribe, there is a strong phylogenetic distinction between the
northern and southern species of this genus.Nonetheless, species that are more similar in their morphology than expected by chance
and co-occur at a 110 x 110 km-scale might be segregated at the local scale. For
example, 12 of the 16 Triatoma species of the North American
assemblages are found in different habitats, including bat caves and shelters, cricetid
nests, Edentata shelters, didelphid shelters, sciurid shelters and Galliformes nests (
Carcavallo et al. 1998c ). Similarly, 15 of
the 17 triatomine species of the South American assemblages show an extremely large
variety of relationships with habitats and associated fauna: bat caves and bat tree
holes [e.g., Caviidae caves, Dasypodidae and Myrmecophagidae burrows, Didelphidae,
Procyonidae, Echimidae, Phyllostomidae, Caviidae, Microcavia, Cricetidae, Muridae and
Dasypodidae shelters, Passeriformes and Psittaciformes nests and Caviidae and Cricetidae
nests ( Carcavallo et al. 1998c )], providing the
potential for strong habitat segregation. Thus, although climate may promote the
occurrence of assemblages composed of morphologically similar species at the regional
scale, habitat and ecological interactions with other species may vary and these
differences could be coupled with other demographic ( Medone et al. 2012 ), dietary ( Rabinovich et
al. 2011 ) and physiological ( Pereira et al.
2006 ) differences among triatomine species to facilitate coexistence at a
local scale.The environmental variables used in our analyses could not account for the presence of
species assemblages composed of taxa that are more dissimilar than expected by chance
alone, which were mainly located in tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests.
The small number of species assemblages with this type of structure and their scattered
distribution within tropical areas further complicates interpretation of this pattern.
However, coexisting species may be more different than expected by chance if a
competition-based limiting similarity underlies the organisation of local species
assemblages ( MacArthur & Levin 1964 ). It
has been suggested that this limiting similarity could scale up to affect species
co-occurrence patterns at a large geographic scale ( Davies et al. 2007 ); however, the role of competition was impossible to test
given the scale of our analysis as well as the inherent comparative-descriptive nature
of this type of study.We conclude that Triatominae provide useful insight regarding patterns and processes
associated with the structuring of MDiv of species on a large geographic scale. Our
geographical analysis of MDiv has opened a new perspective for the study of triatomines
and we propose that specialists in ecology, behaviour and physiology should look deeper
into possible differences between triatomine species that may explain their
co-occurrence at the geographical level.Geographic patterns in Triatominae diversity and Chagas disease - In
most Latin American countries, multiple initiatives have been implemented to control
Chagas disease vectors based on entomological and epidemiological criteria ( Guhl 2009 ). In Brazil, the spatial distribution of
mean mortality rates caused by Chagas disease per 100,000 inhabitants/year between
1999-2007 shows a clear concentration of municipalities with high mortality in the
Central-West Region, including the Federal District, major parts of the state of Goiás
and the so-called Triângulo Mineiro region of northwestern of the state of Minas Gerais
and north of the state of São Paulo (SP); some areas of the states of Mato Grosso do
Sul, Bahia (BA) and Tocantins are also affected and additional small high-mortality
areas are found in the border between the state of Paraná and SP, in southern state of
Piauí and in north-central regions of BA ( Martins-Melo
et al. 2012a ). Our study showed that the heterogeneous and focal distribution
of those areas of high mortality risk greatly overlapped areas of high SR in Brazil
[compare Fig. 2 in Martins-Melo et al. (2012a) with Supplementary data 4, Fig. S5 ]. This may have important consequences for planning control
actions. It has been observed that despite the recent elimination of the most important
vector species in Brazil ( Triatoma infestans ), the spatial clusters
of high mortality areas have remained relatively stable over time ( Martins-Melo et al. 2012a ). In addition, although
certain Regions of Brazil (Central-West and Southeast) have seen a steady decline in
mortality due to Chagas disease after efforts were concentrated to eliminate the primary
vector T. infestans, in other regions (North and Northeast), a
reduction in mortality rates required interventions to control other prevailing vectors
( Martins-Melo et al. 2012b ). Vector species of
subtropical affinity (i.e., those whose geographical distributions largely encompass
subtropical latitudes of South America: T. infestans, Triatoma brasiliensis,
Triatoma sordida and Panstrongylus megistus ) tend to show
extensive overlap with sites having high triatomine SR (Supplementary data 4, Fig. S7A-D ). Hence, in the absence of reliable
information or underreporting of mortality data, areas of high triatomine SR could be
considered preliminary indicator areas of high potential mortality risk within the
subtropics of South America. In parallel with this reasoning, we suggest that in
Argentina, the high-richness area encompassing the eastern portion of the provinces of
Jujuy, Salta, Tucuman, Catamarca and La Rioja, the northeastern areas of San Luis
province, the northwest part of Cordoba province, the eastern region of Santiago del
Estero province and the borders between the provinces of Salta, Chaco and Formosa
(Supplementary data 4, Fig. S5 ) deserve priority
in the development of policies involving vector control.
Fig. S5
political divisions of Brazil (states) and Argentina (provinces) overlapped
onto the spatial pattern of variation in triatomine species richness. AC: Acre;
AL: Alagoas; AM: Amazonas; AP: Amapá; BA: Bahia; CE: Ceará; ES: Espírito Santo;
GO: Goiás; MA: Maranhão; MG: Minas Gerais; MS: Mato Grosso do Sul; MT: Mato
Grosso; PA: Pará; PB: Paraíba; PE: Pernambuco; PI: Piauí; PR: Paraná; RJ: Rio de
Janeiro; RN: Rio Grande do Norte; RO: Rondônia; RR: Roraima; RS: Rio Grande do
Sul; SC: Santa Catarina; SE: Sergipe; SP: São Paulo; TO: Tocantins; BA: Buenos
Aires; CC: Chaco; CD: Córdoba; CH: Chubut; CR: Corrientes; CT: Catamarca; ER:
Entre Ríos; FO: Formosa; JY: Jujuy; LP: La Pampa; LR: La Rioja; MN: Misiones; MZ:
Mendoza; NQ: Neuquén; RN: Río Negro; SA: Salta; SC: Santa Cruz; SE: Santiago del
Estero; SF: Santa Fe; SJ: San Juan; SL: San Luis; TF: Tierra del Fuego; TU:
Tucumán.
Within the tropics, there are regions of high triatomine SR in Venezuela, in Andean
regions in Ecuador, Colombia and northern Peru and Brazil in the state of Pará close to
the Amazon River mouth (Supplementary data 4, Fig.
S5 ). However, there are only two vector species ( Triatoma
maculate and Panstrongylus geniculatus ) of tropical
affinity (i.e., those constrained to live within tropical latitudes of South and Central
America) associated with high-richness regions (Supplementary data 4, Fig. S7E, L ); the remaining vectors of tropical
affinity ( Rhodnius prolixus, Triatoma dimidiata, Rhodnius pallescens, Rhodnius
ecuatoriensis, Rhodnius robustus and Rhodnius brethesi )
tend to overlap sites with low, intermediate and high SR in similar proportions
(Supplementary data 4, Fig. S7F-K ). Thus, we
predict that centres of high triatomine SR could be more closely associated with centres
of high mortality risk in the subtropics rather than in the tropics of South
America.The geographic distributions of vector species are more variable with respect to their
association with MDiv than with SR. The association of areas of high mortality risk
identified in Brazil ( Martins-Melo et al. 2012a
, b ) with patterns in MDiv is less clear because
vector species of subtropical affinity tend to overlap a greater proportion of sites of
intermediate MDiv (Supplementary data 4, Fig.
S8A-D ). In contrast, the geographical distribution of vector species of
tropical affinity is associated with sites of high MDiv (Supplementary data 4, Fig. S8F-K ). In addition, vector species of
subtropical affinity are represented in assemblages of species that are more similar or
dissimilar than expected by chance (Supplementary data 4, Fig. S9A-D ), whereas those of tropical affinity are represented in
assemblages that are more dissimilar than expected by chance (Supplementary data 4,
Fig. S9E-L ). Although the possible
implications of these patterns remain to be elucidated in terms of the epidemiology of
Chagas disease, the present study suggests that analyses of biogeographical patterns in
Triatominae diversity may complement analyses of the spatial variation in
epidemiological parameters ( Martins-Melo et al.
2012a , b ) in attempts to define
strategies for vector control at a large spatial scale in the Neotropics.
Fig. S9
the geographical distribution of species (in black) that were included in
continental initiatives to control the main vectors of Chagas disease [mentioned
in Guhl (2009)] compared with the location of assemblages with species more
similar (in green) or more dissimilar (in pink) with respect to morphology than
expected by chance (for details, see main text and Figs 2, 3).
Supplementary data 1
Supplementary data 2
a: evaluation of the effect of spatial autocorrelation on the performance of
environmental models fitted to morphological diversity (MDiv) and species richness
(SR) - We checked the adequacy of the environmental models shown on Tables I
(main text) to account for the geographic variation in MDiv and SR in the presence of
spatial autocorrelation.We elaborated spatial correlograms using Moran’s I coefficient to describe the magnitude
of autocorrelation of MDiv and SR for different distance classes. Then, we examined the
spatial patterns of autocorrelation in their residuals after the fit of the models shown
on Table I. Independently of the pattern of autocorrelation in the original (predictors
and response) variables, if no spatial autocorrelation is found in the residuals it can
be concluded that the model had taken into account all spatial structure in the original
data and that there was no statistical bias in the overall statistical analysis
(Diniz-Filho et al. 2003).The spatial correlogram for MDiv (Fig. S2A) showed a quadratic pattern that indicated
the presence of positive autocorrelation up to c.3100 km, then the negative
autocorrelation increased strongly to reach -0.8 at c.6200 km and then it progressively
decreased to approach low values (i.e. between 0-0.2) at the largest distance classes.
SR showed high positively autocorrelation (0.61) at the shortest distance class
(c.400km), then the autocorrelation decreased up to c.4,000 km and then it increased
again to reach -0.49 at c.7,500 km (Fig. S2B).After model fit, the autocorrelation in the residuals of MDiv at the shortest distance
classes (c.400 km) (Fig. S2A) decreases from 0.80-0.30 and decreases to < 0.1 for all
subsequent distance classes up to c.7,400 km; the spatial autocorrelation increases
again at distance classes > 8,000 km, although coefficients are never larger than 0.2
(Fig. S2A). Similarly, the autocorrelation in the residuals of SR decreases from
0.61-0.38 at the shortest distance classes and then remained between 0-0.15 for all
subsequent distance classes (Fig. S2B).b : the modeling of the spatial patterns of autocorrelation of MDiv and
SR - We modeled the spatial structure of MDiv and SR by the spatial
eigenvector mapping (SEVM) routine in SAM v4 (Rangel et al. 2010). We conducted separate
SVEM analyses for MDiv and SR. The SEVM uses the spatial coordinates of the grid cells
to construct a spatial matrix from which to extract eigenvectors that allow the
decomposition of the whole spatial structure in the data into spatial patterns at
different spatial scales [see Borcard and Legendre (2002) for a formal description of
method] (Diniz-Filho & Bini 2005, Rangel et al. 2010). In this way, the neighborhood
relationships among the grid cells were used to reveal the spatial autocorrelation of
our data set over the whole range of scales encompassed by the sampling design (Borcard
& Legendre 2002, Borcard et al. 2004, Diniz-Filho & Bini 2005).We detrended the data on SR from a significant linear longitudinal trend fitted by least
squares and data on MDiv from two significant (linear and quadratic) latitudinal trends
so that the method would be able to recover finer spatial structures (Borcard &
Legendre 2002, Borcard et al. 2004). We adopted the criterion of minimisation of Moran’s
I in model residuals available in SAM v.4 to select those eigenvectors that were the
best spatial descriptors of the spatial patterns of autocorrelation for MDiv and SR
(Rangel et al. 2010).SAM v.4 selected 61 positive eigenvectors as spatial descriptors of the latitudinally
detrended MDiv and 63 were selected to model the spatial variation in longitudinally
detrended SR (eigenvectors not shown) that reduced the spatial structure in MDiv and SR
at all spatial scales to almost zero (Fig. S3A, B). The spatial descriptors of SR and
MDiv were poorly correlated with the environmental variables retained in models shown on
Table I; for SR, the correlation coefficients (r) ranged from r = -0.32-0.31 and for
MDiv, from -0.38-0.28. Hence, the spatial descriptors provided complementary information
about the spatial structure of MDiv and SR not fully accounted by the environmental
variables.c: partial regression analysis to partition the variation in MDiv and SR -
We combined the spatial descriptors obtained from SEVM with the environmental
predictors shown in Table I (main text) in a partial regression analysis. Given that the
environmental predictors and spatial descriptors were poorly correlated (see above), the
combination of them in statistical models did not introduce a serious problem of
multicollinearity (Hawkins 2012).As explained in Borcard et al . (1992), we partitioned the variation in
MDiv and SR into: (a) the fraction of MDiv and SR explained by environmental descriptors
independently of any spatial structure; (b) the fraction of the variation in MDiv and SR
explained by the shared variation between spatial descriptors and environmental
variables; (c) the spatial variation in MDiv or SR not shared by the environmental
variables analysed, which suggests the operation of some underlying biological process
that has no apparent relation to the environmental variables that were included in our
analysis and (d) the fraction of the MDiv and SR variation explained neither by the
spatial coordinates nor by environmental data. All calculations were done for MDiv and
SR separately and based on:The R2 of the regression model that combined the environmental descriptors in
Table I (main text) that provided information of fractions (a) and (b) above (R2
= a + b).The R2 of the regression model that combined the spatial descriptors obtained
from SVEM and that provided information about fractions (c) and (b) above (R2
= c + b). The spatial descriptors of MDiv were the linear and quadratic terms of
latitude and 61 positive eigenvectors selected by the SVEM routine; for SR, the spatial
descriptors were longitude and 63 positive eigenvectors.The R2 of the regression model that combined the whole set of environmental
and spatial descriptors (full regression model) that provided information about
fractions (a), (b) and (c) above (R2 = a + b + c).According to Borcard et al. (1992), each component of variation was computed from simple
calculations:Results are given in main text.
Supplementary data 3
a: the spatial patterns of autocorrelation in the occurrence of local species
assemblages that are significantly structured with respect to MDiv -
The spatial correlogram for the occurrence of non-random assemblages of species more
similar than expected by chance showed that the spatial autocorrelation increases up to
0.56 only at the shortest distant classes (395 km); lower levels of spatial
autocorrelation occurred for the other distant classes (between -0.18-0.24) (solid
circles on Fig. S4A).The spatial correlogram for the occurrence of non-random assemblages of species more
dissimilar than expected by chance showed low levels of spatial autocorrelation at all
distance classes (-0.04-0.15) (solid circles on Fig. S4C).b: evaluation of the effect of spatial autocorrelation on the performance of
environmental models fitted to MDiv and SR - We used spatial
generalised linear mixed model in R (GLMM) [Dormann et al. (2007) for review] to address
the spatial autocorrelation in models with binomial distribution of errors (Table II,
main text). We used glmmPQL of the MASS package in R [according to the script provided
in Dormann et al. (2007)], with a Gaussian correlation structure in the residuals to
estimate the coefficients of the environmental variables that were preserved in the
final models shown on Table II (main text).GLM and GLMM models resulted in rather similar results, although GLMM tends to reduce
the magnitude of the regression coefficients (compare Table II, main text, and Table S2
below). The spatial autocorrelation that remained in the residuals after the fit of GLM
and GLMM models was low (i.e. Moran’s I equal or less than 0.29 at the shortest distance
classes) (Fig. S4B, D).b : coefficients that indicates the magnitude of the association;
p : the probability level.
Authors: Francisco Rogerlândio Martins-Melo; Alberto Novaes Ramos; Carlos Henrique Alencar; Wolfram Lange; Jorg Heukelbach Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Kamran Safi; Marcus V Cianciaruso; Rafael D Loyola; Daniel Brito; Katrina Armour-Marshall; José Alexandre F Diniz-Filho Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2011-09-12 Impact factor: 6.237