Literature DB >> 24401918

Using simulation to study difficult clinical issues: prenatal counseling at the threshold of viability across American and Dutch cultures.

Rosa Geurtzen1, Marije Hogeveen, Anand K Rajani, Ritu Chitkara, Timothy Antonius, Arno van Heijst, Jos Draaisma, Louis P Halamek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prenatal counseling at the threshold of viability is a challenging yet critically important activity, and care guidelines differ across cultures. Studying how this task is performed in the actual clinical environment is extremely difficult. In this pilot study, we used simulation as a methodology with 2 aims as follows: first, to explore the use of simulation incorporating a standardized pregnant patient as an investigative methodology and, second, to determine similarities and differences in content and style of prenatal counseling between American and Dutch neonatologists.
METHODS: We compared counseling practice between 11 American and 11 Dutch neonatologists, using a simulation-based investigative methodology. All subjects performed prenatal counseling with a simulated pregnant patient carrying a fetus at the limits of viability. The following elements of scenario design were standardized across all scenarios: layout of the physical environment, details of the maternal and fetal histories, questions and responses of the standardized pregnant patient, and the time allowed for consultation.
RESULTS: American subjects typically presented several treatment options without bias, whereas Dutch subjects were more likely to explicitly advise a specific course of treatment (emphasis on partial life support). American subjects offered comfort care more frequently than the Dutch subjects and also discussed options for maximal life support more often than their Dutch colleagues.
CONCLUSIONS: Simulation is a useful research methodology for studying activities difficult to assess in the actual clinical environment such as prenatal counseling at the limits of viability. Dutch subjects were more directive in their approach than their American counterparts, offering fewer options for care and advocating for less invasive interventions. American subjects were more likely to offer a wider range of therapeutic options without providing a recommendation for any specific option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24401918     DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Simul Healthc        ISSN: 1559-2332            Impact factor:   1.929


  7 in total

1.  Prenatal (non)treatment decisions in extreme prematurity: evaluation of Decisional Conflict and Regret among parents.

Authors:  R Geurtzen; J Draaisma; R Hermens; H Scheepers; M Woiski; A van Heijst; M Hogeveen
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Using Simulation as an Investigative Methodology in Researching Competencies of Clinical Social Work Practice: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kenta Asakura; Ruxandra M Gheorghe; Stephanie Borgen; Karen Sewell; Heather MacDonald
Journal:  Clin Soc Work J       Date:  2020-09-24

3.  Preferred prenatal counselling at the limits of viability: a survey among Dutch perinatal professionals.

Authors:  R Geurtzen; Arno Van Heijst; Rosella Hermens; Hubertina Scheepers; Mallory Woiski; Jos Draaisma; Marije Hogeveen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 4.  Counselling about the Risk of Preterm Delivery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Laura Pedrini; Federico Prefumo; Tiziana Frusca; Alberto Ghilardi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Professionals' preferences in prenatal counseling at the limits of viability: a nationwide qualitative Dutch study.

Authors:  Rosa Geurtzen; Arno van Heijst; Jos Draaisma; Laura Ouwerkerk; Hubertina Scheepers; Mallory Woiski; Rosella Hermens; Marije Hogeveen
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Digital vs face-to-face information provision in patient counselling for prenatal screening: A noninferiority randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Robert Adrianus de Leeuw; Sabine Fiona Bianca van der Horst; Anneloes Maaike de Soet; Jeroen Patrick van Hensbergen; Petra Cornelia Afra Maria Bakker; Michiel Westerman; Christianne Johanna Maria de Groot; Fedde Scheele
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Perinatal practice in extreme premature delivery: variation in Dutch physicians' preferences despite guideline.

Authors:  Rosa Geurtzen; Jos Draaisma; Rosella Hermens; Hubertina Scheepers; Mallory Woiski; Arno van Heijst; Marije Hogeveen
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.183

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.