Carrie V Breton1, Fen Yin2, Xinhui Wang3, Ed Avol3, Frank D Gilliland3, Jesus A Araujo2. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, USC Keck School of Medicine, 2001 N. Soto Street, Los Angeles, CA 90089, United States. Electronic address: breton@usc.edu. 2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States. 3. Department of Preventive Medicine, USC Keck School of Medicine, 2001 N. Soto Street, Los Angeles, CA 90089, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to evaluate predictors of HDL anti-oxidant function in young adults. BACKGROUND: High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol is considered a protective factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, increased levels are not always associated with decreased cardiovascular risk. A better understanding of the importance of HDL functionality and how it affects CVD risk is needed. METHODS: Fifty non-Hispanic white subjects from the Testing Responses on Youth (TROY) study were randomly selected to investigate whether differences in HDL anti-oxidant function are associated with traditional cardiovascular risk factors, including carotid intima media thickness (CIMT), arterial stiffness and other inflammatory/metabolic parameters. HDL anti-oxidant capacity was evaluated by assessing its ability to inhibit low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol oxidation by air using a DCF-based fluorescent assay and expressed as a HDL oxidant index (HOI). The associations between HOI and other variables were assessed using both linear and logistic regression. RESULTS: Eleven subjects (25%) had an HOI ≥ 1, indicating a pro-oxidant HDL. Age, LDL, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and paraoxonase activity (PON1), but not HDL, were all associated with HOI level in univariate linear regression models. In multivariate models that mutually adjusted for these variables, LDL remained the strongest predictor of HOI (0.13 increase in HOI per 1 SD increase in LDL, 95% CI 0.04, 0.22). Atherogenic index of plasma, pulse pressure, homocysteine, glucose, insulin, CIMT and measurements of arterial stiffness were not associated with HOI in this population. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest LDL, hsCRP and DBP might predict HDL anti-oxidant function at an early age.
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to evaluate predictors of HDL anti-oxidant function in young adults. BACKGROUND: High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol is considered a protective factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, increased levels are not always associated with decreased cardiovascular risk. A better understanding of the importance of HDL functionality and how it affects CVD risk is needed. METHODS: Fifty non-Hispanic white subjects from the Testing Responses on Youth (TROY) study were randomly selected to investigate whether differences in HDL anti-oxidant function are associated with traditional cardiovascular risk factors, including carotid intima media thickness (CIMT), arterial stiffness and other inflammatory/metabolic parameters. HDL anti-oxidant capacity was evaluated by assessing its ability to inhibit low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol oxidation by air using a DCF-based fluorescent assay and expressed as a HDL oxidant index (HOI). The associations between HOI and other variables were assessed using both linear and logistic regression. RESULTS: Eleven subjects (25%) had an HOI ≥ 1, indicating a pro-oxidant HDL. Age, LDL, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and paraoxonase activity (PON1), but not HDL, were all associated with HOI level in univariate linear regression models. In multivariate models that mutually adjusted for these variables, LDL remained the strongest predictor of HOI (0.13 increase in HOI per 1 SD increase in LDL, 95% CI 0.04, 0.22). Atherogenic index of plasma, pulse pressure, homocysteine, glucose, insulin, CIMT and measurements of arterial stiffness were not associated with HOI in this population. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest LDL, hsCRP and DBP might predict HDL anti-oxidant function at an early age.
Authors: Parin J Patel; Amit V Khera; Kashif Jafri; Robert L Wilensky; Daniel J Rader Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Howard N Hodis; Wendy J Mack; Laurie LaBree; Peter R Mahrer; Alex Sevanian; Chao-ran Liu; Ci-hua Liu; Juliana Hwang; Robert H Selzer; Stanley P Azen Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-09-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kwang-Il Kim; Se Won Oh; Soyeon Ahn; Nam Ju Heo; Sejoong Kim; Ho Jun Chin; Ki Young Na; Dong-Wan Chae; Cheol-Ho Kim; Suhnggwon Kim Journal: Am J Med Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Jesus A Araujo; Berenice Barajas; Michael Kleinman; Xuping Wang; Brian J Bennett; Ke Wei Gong; Mohamad Navab; Jack Harkema; Constantinos Sioutas; Aldons J Lusis; Andre E Nel Journal: Circ Res Date: 2008-01-17 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Carmen García-Gómez; Maria Bianchi; Diana de la Fuente; Lina Badimon; Teresa Padró; Emili Corbella; Xavier Pintó Journal: World J Orthop Date: 2014-07-18
Authors: Roya S Moheimani; May Bhetraratana; Fen Yin; Kacey M Peters; Jeffrey Gornbein; Jesus A Araujo; Holly R Middlekauff Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 30.154
Authors: Christina Charles-Schoeman; Yuen Yin Lee; Ani Shahbazian; Xiaoyan Wang; David Elashoff; Jeffrey R Curtis; Iris Navarro-Millán; Shuo Yang; Lang Chen; Stacey S Cofield; Larry W Moreland; Harold Paulus; James O'Dell; Joan Bathon; S Louis Bridges; Srinivasa T Reddy Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 15.483
Authors: Mary F Lopez; Bryan Krastins; David A Sarracino; Gregory Byram; Maryann S Vogelsang; Amol Prakash; Scott Peterman; Shadab Ahmad; Gouri Vadali; Wenjun Deng; Ignacio Inglessis; Tom Wickham; Kathleen Feeney; G William Dec; Igor Palacios; Ferdinando S Buonanno; Eng H Lo; MingMing Ning Journal: Clin Proteomics Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 3.988
Authors: Nicholas J Woudberg; Julia H Goedecke; Dee Blackhurst; Miguel Frias; Richard James; Lionel H Opie; Sandrine Lecour Journal: Lipids Health Dis Date: 2016-05-11 Impact factor: 3.876