Literature DB >> 24400688

Basal values, intra-day and inter-day variations in tear film osmolarity and tear fluorescein clearance.

Noelia García1, Marisa Tesón, Amalia Enríquez-de-Salamanca, Laura Mena, Amelia Sacristán, Itziar Fernández, Margarita Calonge, María J González-García.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the normal inter-day and intra-day variations in tear film osmolarity and the tear fluorescein clearance test (T-FCT) in healthy subjects.
METHODS: Tear samples from 24 young, healthy adults were collected from 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM (midday) and 5:00 PM to 7:00 PM (evening) on three non-consecutive days. Tear osmolarity measurement and the T-FCT were performed to assess the basal values and inter-day and intra-day variations of the test results. A freezing point depression osmometer was used to analyze the tear osmolarity, and the T-FCT was performed using a fluorophotometer.
RESULTS: The mean osmolarity value was 270 ± 4.4 mOsm/l and the mean T-FCT result was 2.97 ± 0.17 fluorescence arbitrary units. The inter-day or intra-day tear osmolarity values did not differ significantly. The T-FCT results varied significantly during the day, with significantly (p = 0.0004) higher results in the evening; no significant differences were found in the inter-day analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Tear osmolarity was unaffected by intra-day variations; however, the T-FCT showed an inter-day variation, which indicated that the time of day when the test is performed must be considered when it is used to evaluate the diagnosis of dry eye disease, disease progression or therapeutic effectiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Basal values; dry eye disease; ocular surface; osmolarity; tear fluorescein clearance test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24400688     DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2013.865757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Eye Res        ISSN: 0271-3683            Impact factor:   2.424


  4 in total

Review 1.  TFOS DEWS II Tear Film Report.

Authors:  Mark D P Willcox; Pablo Argüeso; Georgi A Georgiev; Juha M Holopainen; Gordon W Laurie; Tom J Millar; Eric B Papas; Jannick P Rolland; Tannin A Schmidt; Ulrike Stahl; Tatiana Suarez; Lakshman N Subbaraman; Omür Ö Uçakhan; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 2.  Diagnosis of dry eye disease and emerging technologies.

Authors:  Maya Salomon-Ben Zeev; Darby Douglas Miller; Robert Latkany
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-20

3.  Response to "Variability of Tear Osmolarity Measurements With a Point-of-Care System in Healthy Subjects-Systematic Review".

Authors:  Benjamin David Sullivan
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  High-Intensity Use of Smartphone Can Significantly Increase the Diagnostic Rate and Severity of Dry Eye.

Authors:  Chunyang Wang; Kelan Yuan; Yujie Mou; Yaying Wu; Xin Wang; Renjian Hu; Jinjin Min; Xiaodan Huang; Xiuming Jin
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.