Literature DB >> 24400506

Disturbance regime alters the impact of dispersal on alpha and beta diversity in a natural metacommunity.

Bram Vanschoenwinkel1, Falko Buschke2, Luc Brendonck2.   

Abstract

Disturbance and dispersal are two fundamental ecological processes that shape diversity patterns, yet their interaction and the underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood, and evidence from natural systems is particularly lacking. Using an invertebrate rock pool metacommunity in South Africa as a natural model system, we studied potential interactive effects of disturbance regime and patch isolation on diversity patterns of species with contrasting dispersal modes (passive vs. active dispersal). Isolation and disturbance regime had negative synergistic effects on alpha diversity: both directly, by excluding late-successional species from isolated patches; and indirectly, by modulating establishment success of generalist predators in well-connected patches. Unimodal relationships between isolation and alpha diversity, as predicted by mass effects, were only detected for passive dispersers in frequently disturbed patches and not in active dispersers. For passive dispersers, indications for a positive effect of isolation and a negative effect of disturbance on beta diversity were found, presumably due to differences in deterministic succession and stochastic colonization-extinction dynamics among different patch types. Our findings illustrate that interactions between dispersal rates and disturbance regime are important when explaining species diversity patterns in metacommunities and support the idea that diversity in frequently disturbed habitats is more sensitive to effects of dispersal-based processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24400506     DOI: 10.1890/12-1576.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  7 in total

1.  Habitat isolation and the cues of three remote predators differentially modulate prey colonization dynamics in pond landscapes.

Authors:  Jayme M Santangelo; Bram Vanschoenwinkel; Hendrik Trekels
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Correlates of zooplankton beta diversity in tropical lake systems.

Authors:  Paloma M Lopes; Luis M Bini; Steven A J Declerck; Vinicius F Farjalla; Ludgero C G Vieira; Claudia C Bonecker; Fabio A Lansac-Toha; Francisco A Esteves; Reinaldo L Bozelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Climate change jeopardizes the persistence of freshwater zooplankton by reducing both habitat suitability and demographic resilience.

Authors:  Tom Pinceel; Falko Buschke; Margo Weckx; Luc Brendonck; Bram Vanschoenwinkel
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.964

4.  Beta Diversity Patterns of Post-fire Forests in Central Yunnan Plateau, Southwest China: Disturbances Intensify the Priority Effect in the Community Assembly.

Authors:  Jie Han; Zehao Shen; Yiying Li; Caifang Luo; Qian Xu; Kang Yang; Zhiming Zhang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Factors influencing the biodiversity of three microbial groups within and among islands of the Baltic Sea.

Authors:  Anette Teittinen; Leena Virta; Mingjia Li; Jianjun Wang
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 4.194

6.  The multiple roles of β-diversity help untangle community assembly processes affecting recovery of temperate rocky shores.

Authors:  Mariachiara Chiantore; Simon F Thrush; Valentina Asnaghi; Judi E Hewitt
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  The effects of temperature and dispersal on species diversity in natural microbial metacommunities.

Authors:  Elodie C Parain; Sarah M Gray; Louis-Félix Bersier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.