Literature DB >> 24400358

The role of motor response in implicit encoding: evidence from intertrial priming in pop-out search.

Amit Yashar, Tal Makovski, Dominique Lamy.   

Abstract

Perception and motor control jointly act to meet our current needs. Recent evidence shows that the generation of motor action significantly affects perception. Here, we examined the role of motor response in inter-trial priming, namely, in Priming of Pop-out (PoP): when searching for a singleton target, performance is improved when the target and distractors features repeat on consecutive search trials than when they switch. Although recent studies have shown an interaction between motor response and PoP, the role of motor action on priming has not been fully characterized. Here we investigated whether motor action is necessary during encoding, for PoP to be observed. On go trials, observers searched for a color singleton target and responded to its shape, while on no-go trials they passively watched the display instead of responding to the target. We observed PoP even when the previous trial had been a no-go trial, suggesting that encoding of search-relevant attributes in pop-out displays is not contingent on motor response. Nevertheless, the repetition effect was larger after a go trial than after a no-go trial, supporting the dual-stage model of PoP, according to which this effect involves both a perceptual and a motor component.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24400358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

Review 1.  Neuromodulation as a mechanism for the induction of repetition priming.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Cropper; Allyson K Friedman; Jian Jing; Matthew H Perkins; Klaudiusz R Weiss
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Selection and response bias as determinants of priming of pop-out search: Revelations from diffusion modeling.

Authors:  Bryan R Burnham
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

Review 3.  Does feature intertrial priming guide attention? The jury is still out.

Authors:  Aniruddha Ramgir; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-10-08

4.  Target selection bias transfers across different response actions.

Authors:  Jeff Moher; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Use of the Aplysia feeding network to study repetition priming of an episodic behavior.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Cropper; Jian Jing; Matthew H Perkins; Klaudiusz R Weiss
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Feature singletons attract spatial attention independently of feature priming.

Authors:  Amit Yashar; Alex L White; Wanghaoming Fang; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Implicitly and explicitly encoded features can guide attention in free viewing.

Authors:  Aoqi Li; Jeremy M Wolfe; Zhenzhong Chen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.