Literature DB >> 24400206

The reversal of cardiology practices: interventions that were tried in vain.

Vinay Prasad1, Adam Cifu2.   

Abstract

Medical reversal happens when new trials-better powered, designed or controlled than predecessors--contradict current standard of care. The Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial and CAST study are notable examples of investigations that overturned current practice by demonstrating that these interventions offered no survival benefits. In this mini-review, we summarize our experience reviewing a decade of original articles in the New England Journal of Medicine with an eye towards investigations that reversed cardiology practice. From the management of arrhythmias to lipids to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and finally, hemodynamics, reversals in the cardiology literature cover a broad set of practices. These reversals are instructive in that many of the therapies overturned were widely adopted and based on either sound physiologic reasoning or observational trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical reversal; PCI; bias; contradiction; evidence based medicine; primary prevention; statins; stenting

Year:  2013        PMID: 24400206      PMCID: PMC3878120          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2013.10.05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther        ISSN: 2223-3652


  41 in total

1.  A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Isabelle C Van Gelder; Vincent E Hagens; Hans A Bosker; J Herre Kingma; Otto Kamp; Tsjerk Kingma; Salah A Said; Julius I Darmanata; Alphons J M Timmermans; Jan G P Tijssen; Harry J G M Crijns
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-12-05       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Defending the rationale for the two-tailed test in clinical research.

Authors:  Lemuel A Moyé; Alan T N Tita
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Mette T Haahr; Peter C Gøtzsche; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Cardiovascular primary prevention: how high should we set the bar?

Authors:  Vinay Prasad; Andrae Vandross
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-23

Review 5.  A decade of reversal: an analysis of 146 contradicted medical practices.

Authors:  Vinay Prasad; Andrae Vandross; Caitlin Toomey; Michael Cheung; Jason Rho; Steven Quinn; Satish Jacob Chacko; Durga Borkar; Victor Gall; Senthil Selvaraj; Nancy Ho; Adam Cifu
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Evidence for overturning the guidelines in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Christopher M O'Connor; Joseph G Rogers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Continuous positive airway pressure for central sleep apnea and heart failure.

Authors:  T Douglas Bradley; Alexander G Logan; R John Kimoff; Frédéric Sériès; Debra Morrison; Kathleen Ferguson; Israel Belenkie; Michael Pfeifer; John Fleetham; Patrick Hanly; Mark Smilovitch; George Tomlinson; John S Floras
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy.

Authors:  William E Boden; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Todd Anderson; Bernard R Chaitman; Patrice Desvignes-Nickens; Kent Koprowicz; Ruth McBride; Koon Teo; William Weintraub
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease.

Authors:  William S Weintraub; John A Spertus; Paul Kolm; David J Maron; Zefeng Zhang; Claudine Jurkovitz; Wei Zhang; Pamela M Hartigan; Cheryl Lewis; Emir Veledar; Jim Bowen; Sandra B Dunbar; Christi Deaton; Stanley Kaufman; Robert A O'Rourke; Ron Goeree; Paul G Barnett; Koon K Teo; William E Boden; G B J Mancini
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Why most published research findings are false.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.613

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.