Literature DB >> 24399754

Mutualism fails when climate response differs between interacting species.

Robert J Warren1, Mark A Bradford.   

Abstract

Successful species interactions require that both partners share a similar cue. For many species, spring warming acts as a shared signal to synchronize mutualist behaviors. Spring flowering plants and the ants that disperse their seeds respond to warming temperatures so that ants forage when plants drop seeds. However, where warm-adapted ants replace cold-adapted ants, changes in this timing might leave early seeds stranded without a disperser. We investigate plant seed dispersal south and north of a distinct boundary between warm- and cold-adapted ants to determine if changes in the ant species influence local plant dispersal. The warm-adapted ants forage much later than the cold-adapted ants, and so we first assess natural populations of early and late blooming plants. We then transplant these plants south and north of the ant boundary to test whether distinct ant climate requirements disrupt the ant-plant mutualism. Whereas the early blooming plant's inability to synchronize with the warm-adapted ant leaves its populations clumped and patchy and its seedlings clustered around the parents in natural populations, when transplanted into the range of the cold-adapted ant, effective seed dispersal recovers. In contrast, the mutualism persists for the later blooming plant regardless of location because it sets seed later in spring when both warm- and cold-adapted ant species forage, resulting in effective seed dispersal. These results indicate that the climate response of species interactions, not just the species themselves, is integral in understanding ecological responses to a changing climate. Data linking phenological synchrony and dispersal are rare, and these results suggest a viable mechanism by which a species' range is limited more by biotic than abiotic interactions - despite the general assumption that biotic influences are buried within larger climate drivers. These results show that biotic partner can be as fundamental a niche requirement as abiotic resources.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anemone americana; Aphaenogaster; Asarum arifolium; climate warming; mutualism; myrmecochory; phenological synchrony; species distributions; species interactions

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24399754     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  10 in total

1.  Effects of desiccation and starvation on thermal tolerance and the heat-shock response in forest ants.

Authors:  Andrew D Nguyen; Kerri DeNovellis; Skyler Resendez; Jeremy D Pustilnik; Nicholas J Gotelli; Joel D Parker; Sara Helms Cahan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Phenological shifts and the fate of mutualisms.

Authors:  Nicole E Rafferty; Paul J CaraDonna; Judith L Bronstein
Journal:  Oikos       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 3.903

3.  Foliar fungal endophyte communities are structured by environment but not host ecotype in Panicum virgatum (switchgrass).

Authors:  Briana K Whitaker; Heather L Reynolds; Keith Clay
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Adding Biotic Interactions into Paleodistribution Models: A Host-Cleptoparasite Complex of Neotropical Orchid Bees.

Authors:  Daniel Paiva Silva; Sara Varela; André Nemésio; Paulo De Marco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Ant-mediated seed dispersal in a warmed world.

Authors:  Katharine L Stuble; Courtney M Patterson; Mariano A Rodriguez-Cabal; Relena R Ribbons; Robert R Dunn; Nathan J Sanders
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  The extended phenotypes of marine symbioses: ecological and evolutionary consequences of intraspecific genetic diversity in coral-algal associations.

Authors:  John E Parkinson; Iliana B Baums
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  High temperatures result in smaller nurseries which lower reproduction of pollinators and parasites in a brood site pollination mutualism.

Authors:  Anusha Krishnan; Gautam Kumar Pramanik; Santosh V Revadi; Vignesh Venkateswaran; Renee M Borges
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Approaches to Macroevolution: 2. Sorting of Variation, Some Overarching Issues, and General Conclusions.

Authors:  David Jablonski
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.119

9.  Reduced dispersal at nonexpanding range margins: A matter of disperser identity.

Authors:  Gilad Ben Zvi; Merav Seifan; Itamar Giladi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 10.  The response of ants to climate change.

Authors:  Catherine L Parr; Tom R Bishop
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 13.211

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.