BACKGROUND: The 2005 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES) guidelines for the management of antithrombotic drugs focused on the increasing risks of bleeding, even from biopsy during scheduled esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The new 2012 guidelines emphasized the prevention of thromboembolic complications. To compare with the new guidelines, we investigated the clinical management of EGD by clinicians under the former JGES guidelines for patients taking antithrombotic agents. METHODS: Medical records of 4574 patients (mean age 63.4 years, range 3-96 years, male/female ratio 2805/1769) who underwent scheduled EGD from April 2011 to March 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. The prescribed agents, pre-existing comorbidities, drug cessation before EGD, bleeding, and thromboembolic complications were investigated. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-six patients (12.0 %) were taking antithrombotic drugs (aspirin, 313; warfarin, 134; cilostazol, 57; clopidogrel, 59; ethylicosapentate, 40; prostaglandin preparations, 41; ticlopidine, 29; icosapentate, 24; dipyridamole, 4); 116 and 29 patients, respectively, were managed with a combination of 2 or 3 agents. Among 490 patients whose medical records were precisely documented, 40.6 % underwent EGD without cessation. Bleeding and thromboembolic complications were not observed. The most common pre-existing comorbidity was ischemic heart disease (27.9 %), followed by carotid or intracranial large artery atherosclerosis (20.5 %), cerebral infarction or transient ischemic attack (20.3 %), and atrial fibrillation (15.9 %). Patients with pre-existing comorbidity requiring anticoagulants frequently underwent EGD without cessation. CONCLUSION: We revealed the low impact of the 2005 JGES guidelines on the management of antithrombotic drugs. Our physicians have reasonably decided to continue antithrombotic drugs before EGD according to the risk of thromboembolism.
BACKGROUND: The 2005 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES) guidelines for the management of antithrombotic drugs focused on the increasing risks of bleeding, even from biopsy during scheduled esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The new 2012 guidelines emphasized the prevention of thromboembolic complications. To compare with the new guidelines, we investigated the clinical management of EGD by clinicians under the former JGES guidelines for patients taking antithrombotic agents. METHODS: Medical records of 4574 patients (mean age 63.4 years, range 3-96 years, male/female ratio 2805/1769) who underwent scheduled EGD from April 2011 to March 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. The prescribed agents, pre-existing comorbidities, drug cessation before EGD, bleeding, and thromboembolic complications were investigated. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-six patients (12.0 %) were taking antithrombotic drugs (aspirin, 313; warfarin, 134; cilostazol, 57; clopidogrel, 59; ethylicosapentate, 40; prostaglandin preparations, 41; ticlopidine, 29; icosapentate, 24; dipyridamole, 4); 116 and 29 patients, respectively, were managed with a combination of 2 or 3 agents. Among 490 patients whose medical records were precisely documented, 40.6 % underwent EGD without cessation. Bleeding and thromboembolic complications were not observed. The most common pre-existing comorbidity was ischemic heart disease (27.9 %), followed by carotid or intracranial large artery atherosclerosis (20.5 %), cerebral infarction or transient ischemic attack (20.3 %), and atrial fibrillation (15.9 %). Patients with pre-existing comorbidity requiring anticoagulants frequently underwent EGD without cessation. CONCLUSION: We revealed the low impact of the 2005 JGES guidelines on the management of antithrombotic drugs. Our physicians have reasonably decided to continue antithrombotic drugs before EGD according to the risk of thromboembolism.
Authors: B Napoléon; B Boneu; L Maillard; C-M Samama; J-F Schved; G Gay; T Ponchon; D Sautereau; J-M Canard Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2006-03-14 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Michelle A Anderson; Tamir Ben-Menachem; S Ian Gan; Vasundhara Appalaneni; Subhas Banerjee; Brooks D Cash; Laurel Fisher; M Edwyn Harrison; Robert D Fanelli; Norio Fukami; Steven O Ikenberry; Rajeev Jain; Khalid Khan; Mary Lee Krinsky; David R Lichtenstein; John T Maple; Bo Shen; Laura Strohmeyer; Todd Baron; Jason A Dominitz Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2009-11-03 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: H T Sørensen; L Mellemkjaer; W J Blot; G L Nielsen; F H Steffensen; J K McLaughlin; J H Olsen Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Sun-Young Lee; Shou-jiang Tang; Don C Rockey; Douglas Weinstein; Luis Lara; Jayaprakash Sreenarasimhaiah; Kyoo Wan Choi Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2008-04-02 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Herbert D Aronow; Steven R Steinhubl; Danielle M Brennan; Peter B Berger; Eric J Topol Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 4.749