Literature DB >> 24398713

Indirect calorimetry: a case for improved standard operating procedures.

K J Acheson1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24398713     DOI： 10.1038/ejcn.2013.211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN： 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Practical limitations of the Deltatrac indirect calorimeter.

Authors:  S B Vohra; M A Keegan; I T Campbell; K McGuinness
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.324

2.  Indirect calorimetry in humans: a postcalorimetric evaluation procedure for correction of metabolic monitor variability.

Authors:  Peter Schadewaldt; Bettina Nowotny; Klaus Strassburger; Jörg Kotzka; Michael Roden
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  An evaluation of the Deltatrac indirect calorimeter by gravimetric injection and alcohol burning.

Authors:  B G Cooper; J A McLean; R Taylor
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1991-11
  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Reproducibility of the energy metabolism response to an oral glucose tolerance test: influence of a postcalorimetric correction procedure.

Authors:  Juan M A Alcantara; Guillermo Sanchez-Delgado; Lucas Jurado-Fasoli; Jose E Galgani; Idoia Labayen; Jonatan R Ruiz
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.865

2.  Comparison of the GEM and the ECAL indirect calorimeters against the Deltatrac for measures of RMR and diet-induced thermogenesis.

Authors:  S Kennedy; L Ryan; A Fraser; M E Clegg
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2014-11-07

3.  Predicting resting energy expenditure in underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese adult hospital patients.

Authors:  Hinke M Kruizenga; Geesje H Hofsteenge; Peter J M Weijs
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.169
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.