BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: The habitual consumption of a specific type of alcoholic beverage may be related to the overall dietary pattern. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to investigate associations between alcoholic beverage preference and dietary intake in The Netherlands. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: A total of 2100 men and women from the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 2007-2010 were studied. A general questionnaire assessed alcoholic beverage preference and two non-consecutive 24-h dietary recalls assessed overall diet. Mean nutrient and food group intakes, and adherence to the 2006 Dutch dietary guidelines across categories of alcoholic beverage preference were compared and adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), education, smoking, physical activity, energy intake and frequency and absolute alcohol consumption. RESULTS: Largest differences in dietary habits were detected between persons who preferred wine and those who preferred beer. Persons with a beer preference had a higher absolute intake of meat, soft drinks, margarine and snacks. In contrast, persons with a wine preference had a higher absolute consumption of healthy foods. However, after multiple adjustments, wine consumers still consumed less energy and more vegetables and fruit juices compared with beer consumers. Adherence to the Dutch dietary guidelines did not differ between preference categories after multiple adjustments. CONCLUSIONS: In this cross-sectional analysis in a representative sample of the Dutch population, a beer preference was associated with less healthy dietary behaviour, especially compared with wine preference. However, these differences were largely explained by other socio-demographic and lifestyle factors. These results suggest that alcoholic beverage preference may not be independently related to diet.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: The habitual consumption of a specific type of alcoholic beverage may be related to the overall dietary pattern. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to investigate associations between alcoholic beverage preference and dietary intake in The Netherlands. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: A total of 2100 men and women from the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 2007-2010 were studied. A general questionnaire assessed alcoholic beverage preference and two non-consecutive 24-h dietary recalls assessed overall diet. Mean nutrient and food group intakes, and adherence to the 2006 Dutch dietary guidelines across categories of alcoholic beverage preference were compared and adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), education, smoking, physical activity, energy intake and frequency and absolute alcohol consumption. RESULTS: Largest differences in dietary habits were detected between persons who preferred wine and those who preferred beer. Persons with a beer preference had a higher absolute intake of meat, soft drinks, margarine and snacks. In contrast, persons with a wine preference had a higher absolute consumption of healthy foods. However, after multiple adjustments, wine consumers still consumed less energy and more vegetables and fruit juices compared with beer consumers. Adherence to the Dutch dietary guidelines did not differ between preference categories after multiple adjustments. CONCLUSIONS: In this cross-sectional analysis in a representative sample of the Dutch population, a beer preference was associated with less healthy dietary behaviour, especially compared with wine preference. However, these differences were largely explained by other socio-demographic and lifestyle factors. These results suggest that alcoholic beverage preference may not be independently related to diet.
Authors: M Grønbaek; E L Mortensen; K Mygind; A T Andersen; U Becker; C Gluud; T I Sørensen Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Simona Costanzo; Augusto Di Castelnuovo; Maria Benedetta Donati; Licia Iacoviello; Giovanni de Gaetano Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2011-11-11 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: John C Barefoot; Morten Grønbaek; John R Feaganes; R Sue McPherson; Redford B Williams; Ilene C Siegler Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Francisco de Asis Carmona-Torre; Ana Garcia-Arellano; Iva Marques-Lopes; Josep Basora; Dolores Corella; Enrique Gómez-Gracia; Miquel Fiol; María-Isabel Covas; Fernando Aros; Manuel Conde; Jose Lapetra; Ramon Estruch; Miguel Angel Martinez-Gonzalez Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2008 Sep-Oct
Authors: S E McCann; C Sempos; J L Freudenheim; P Muti; M Russell; T H Nochajski; M Ram; K Hovey; M Trevisan Journal: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 4.222
Authors: K Klipstein-Grobusch; N Slimani; V Krogh; U Keil; H Boeing; K Overvad; A Tjønneland; F Clavel-Chapelon; A Thiébaut; J Linseisen; M B Schulze; P Lagiou; A Papadimitrou; C Saieva; F Veglia; H B Bueno-De-Mesquita; P H M Peeters; M Kumle; M Brustad; C Martínez García; A Barricarte; G Berglund; L Weinehall; A Mulligan; N Allen; P Ferrari; E Riboli Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Gordon Fehringer; Darren R Brenner; Zuo-Feng Zhang; Yuan-Chin Amy Lee; Keitaro Matsuo; Hidemi Ito; Qing Lan; Paolo Vineis; Mattias Johansson; Kim Overvad; Elio Riboli; Antonia Trichopoulou; Carlotta Sacerdote; Isabelle Stucker; Paolo Boffetta; Paul Brennan; David C Christiani; Yun-Chul Hong; Maria Teresa Landi; Hal Morgenstern; Ann G Schwartz; Angela S Wenzlaff; Gad Rennert; John R McLaughlin; Curtis C Harris; Susan Olivo-Marston; Irene Orlow; Bernard J Park; Marjorie Zauderer; Juan M Barros Dios; Alberto Ruano Raviña; Jack Siemiatycki; Anita Koushik; Philip Lazarus; Ana Fernández-Somoano; Adonina Tardon; Loic Le Marchand; Hermann Brenner; Kai-Uwe Saum; Eric J Duell; Angeline S Andrew; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Jolanta Lissowska; David Zaridze; Peter Rudnai; Eleonora Fabianova; Dana Mates; Lenka Foretova; Vladimir Janout; Vladimir Bencko; Ivana Holcatova; Angela Cecilia Pesatori; Dario Consonni; Ann Olsson; Kurt Straif; Rayjean J Hung Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Diewertje Sluik; Elske M Brouwer-Brolsma; Jeanne H M de Vries; Anouk Geelen; Edith J M Feskens Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Diewertje Sluik; Nicole Jankovic; Mark G O'Doherty; Anouk Geelen; Ben Schöttker; Olov Rolandsson; Jessica C Kiefte-de Jong; Jean Ferrieres; Christina Bamia; Heidi P Fransen; Jolanda M A Boer; Sture Eriksson; Begoña Martínez; José María Huerta; Daan Kromhout; Lisette C P G M de Groot; Oscar H Franco; Antonia Trichopoulou; Paolo Boffetta; Frank Kee; Edith J M Feskens Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-22 Impact factor: 3.240