Markus Due Jakobsen1, Emil Sundstrup, Christoffer H Andersen, Roger Persson, Mette K Zebis, Lars L Andersen. 1. From the National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark (MDJ, ES, CHA, LLA); Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden (RP); Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark (MDJ, ES); and Arthroscopic Centre Amager and Gait Analysis Laboratory, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark (MKZ).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate muscle activity during hamstring rehabilitation exercises performed in training machine compared with elastic resistance. DESIGN:Six women and 13 men aged 28-67 yrs participated in a crossover study. Electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded in the biceps femoris and the semitendinosus during the concentric and the eccentric phase of hamstring curls performed with TheraBand elastic tubing and Technogym training machines and normalized to maximal voluntary isometric contraction-EMG (normalized EMG). Knee joint angle was measured using electronic inclinometers. RESULTS: Training machines and elastic resistance showed similar high levels of muscle activity (biceps femoris and semitendinosus peak normalized EMG >80%). EMG during the concentric phase was higher than during the eccentric phase regardless of exercise and muscle. However, compared with machine exercise, slightly lower (P < 0.05) normalized EMG values were observed using elastic resistance at 30- to 50-degree knee joint angle for the semitendinosus and the biceps femoris during the concentric and the eccentric phase, respectively. Perceived loading (Borg CR10) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) during hamstring curl performed with elastic resistance (7.58 ± 0.08) compared with hamstring curl performed in a machine (5.92 ± 0.03). CONCLUSIONS:Hamstring rehabilitation exercise performed with elastic resistance induces similar peak hamstring muscle activity but slightly lower EMG values at more extended knee angles and with higher perceived loading as hamstring curls using training machines.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate muscle activity during hamstring rehabilitation exercises performed in training machine compared with elastic resistance. DESIGN: Six women and 13 men aged 28-67 yrs participated in a crossover study. Electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded in the biceps femoris and the semitendinosus during the concentric and the eccentric phase of hamstring curls performed with TheraBand elastic tubing and Technogym training machines and normalized to maximal voluntary isometric contraction-EMG (normalized EMG). Knee joint angle was measured using electronic inclinometers. RESULTS: Training machines and elastic resistance showed similar high levels of muscle activity (biceps femoris and semitendinosus peak normalized EMG >80%). EMG during the concentric phase was higher than during the eccentric phase regardless of exercise and muscle. However, compared with machine exercise, slightly lower (P < 0.05) normalized EMG values were observed using elastic resistance at 30- to 50-degree knee joint angle for the semitendinosus and the biceps femoris during the concentric and the eccentric phase, respectively. Perceived loading (Borg CR10) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) during hamstring curl performed with elastic resistance (7.58 ± 0.08) compared with hamstring curl performed in a machine (5.92 ± 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Hamstring rehabilitation exercise performed with elastic resistance induces similar peak hamstring muscle activity but slightly lower EMG values at more extended knee angles and with higher perceived loading as hamstring curls using training machines.
Authors: Marko D M Stojanović; Mladen J Mikić; Zoran Milošević; Jovan Vuković; Tatjana Jezdimirović; Vlatko Vučetić Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Matthew N Bourne; Ryan G Timmins; David A Opar; Tania Pizzari; Joshua D Ruddy; Casey Sims; Morgan D Williams; Anthony J Shield Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Giuseppe Coratella; Gianpaolo Tornatore; Stefano Longo; Fabio Esposito; Emiliano Cè Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jonas Vinstrup; Emil Sundstrup; Mikkel Brandt; Markus D Jakobsen; Joaquin Calatayud; Lars L Andersen Journal: Scientifica (Cairo) Date: 2015-10-18