Literature DB >> 2439856

A new approach to the treatment of chronic low back pain.

M J Ongley, R G Klein, T A Dorman, B C Eek, L J Hubert.   

Abstract

81 patients with chronic low back pain (average duration 10 years) were randomised to two treatment groups. 40 received an empirically devised regimen of forceful spinal manipulation and injections of a dextrose-glycerine-phenol ("proliferant") solution into soft-tissue structures, as part of a programme to decrease pain and disability. The other 41 patients received parallel treatment in which the main differences were less extensive initial local anaesthesia and manipulation, and substitution of saline for proliferant. Neither patients nor assessors knew which treatment had been given. When assessed by disability scores the experimental group had greater improvement than the control group at one (p less than 0.001), three (p less than 0.004), and six (p less than 0.001) months from the end of treatment; at six months an improvement of more than 50% was recorded in 35 of the experimental group versus 16 of the control group and the numbers free from disability were 15 and 4, respectively (p less than 0.003). Visual analogue pain scores and pain diagrams likewise showed significant advantages for the experimental regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2439856     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92340-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  16 in total

Review 1.  Outcome of non-invasive treatment modalities on back pain: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Seppo Seitsalo; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Effect sizes of non-surgical treatments of non-specific low-back pain.

Authors:  A Keller; J Hayden; C Bombardier; M van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Prolotherapy in primary care practice.

Authors:  David Rabago; Andrew Slattengren; Aleksandra Zgierska
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.907

5.  Low back pain: comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient treatment.

Authors:  T W Meade; A O Frank
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-06-30

6.  A randomized, controlled trial of manual therapy and specific adjuvant exercise for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Michael E Geisser; Elizabeth A Wiggert; Andrew J Haig; Miles O Colwell
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  Spinal Manipulation Vs Sham Manipulation for Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jay K Ruddock; Hannah Sallis; Andy Ness; Rachel E Perry
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-05-25

8.  Dextrose-induced subsynovial connective tissue fibrosis in the rabbit carpal tunnel: A potential model to study carpal tunnel syndrome?

Authors:  Sangho Oh; Anke M Ettema; Chunfeng Zhao; Mark E Zobitz; Lester E Wold; Kai-Nan An; Peter C Amadio
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2007-07-04

Review 9.  Low back pain.

Authors:  A Frank
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-04-03

10.  The efficacy of prolotherapy for lateral epicondylosis: a pilot study.

Authors:  Michael Scarpone; David P Rabago; Aleksandra Zgierska; Gennie Arbogast; Edward Snell
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.