Literature DB >> 24398442

Validation of cardiac output studies from the Mostcare compared to a pulmonary artery catheter in septic patients.

S Gopal1, T Do, J S Pooni, G Martinelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Mostcare monitor is a non-invasive cardiac output monitor. It has been well validated in cardiac surgical patients but there is limited evidence on its use in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.
METHODS: The study included the first 22 consecutive patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in whom the floatation of a pulmonary artery catheter was deemed necessary to guide clinical management. Cardiac output measurements including cardiac output, cardiac index and stroke volume were simultaneously calculated and recorded from a thermodilution pulmonary artery catheter and from the Mostcare monitor respectively. The two methods of measuring cardiac output were compared by Bland-Altman statistics and linear regression analysis. A percentage error of less than 30% was defined as acceptable for this study.
RESULTS: Bland-Altman analysis for cardiac output showed a Bias of 0.31 L.min-1, precision (=SD) of 1.97 L.min-1 and a percentage error of 62.54%. For Cardiac Index the bias was 0.21 L.min-1.m-2, precision of 1.10 L.min-1.m-2 and a percentage error of 64%. For stroke volume the bias was 5 mL, precision of 24.46 mL and percentage error of 70.21%. Linear regression produced a correlation coefficient r2 for cardiac output, cardiac index, and stroke volume, of 0.403, 0.306, and 0.3 respectively.
CONCLUSION: Compared to thermodilution cardiac output, cardiac output studies obtained from the Mostcare monitor have an unacceptably high error rate. The Mostcare monitor demonstrated to be an unreliable monitoring device to measure cardiac output in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock on an intensive care unit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24398442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol        ISSN: 0375-9393            Impact factor:   3.051


  5 in total

1.  Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Teboul; Bernd Saugel; Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Christoph K Hofer; Xavier Monnet; Azriel Perel; Michael R Pinsky; Daniel A Reuter; Andrew Rhodes; Pierre Squara; Jean-Louis Vincent; Thomas W Scheeren
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Evolving concepts of hemodynamic monitoring for critically ill patients.

Authors:  Olfa Hamzaoui; Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-04

Review 3.  The Use of Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Sepsis Patients: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Dimitrios Velissaris; Vasilios Karamouzos; Ioanna Kotroni; Charalampos Pierrakos; Menelaos Karanikolas
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2016-09-29

Review 4.  Cardiac Output Monitoring by Pulse Contour Analysis, the Technical Basics of Less-Invasive Techniques.

Authors:  Jörn Grensemann
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-03-06

5.  Transthoracic echocardiography: an accurate and precise method for estimating cardiac output in the critically ill patient.

Authors:  Pablo Mercado; Julien Maizel; Christophe Beyls; Dimitri Titeca-Beauport; Magalie Joris; Loay Kontar; Antoine Riviere; Olivier Bonef; Thierry Soupison; Christophe Tribouilloy; Bertrand de Cagny; Michel Slama
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.