Literature DB >> 24397786

Characteristic differences in barrier and hygroscopic properties between normal and cosmetic dry skin. I. Enhanced barrier analysis with sequential tape-stripping.

N Lu1, P Chandar, D Tempesta, C Vincent, J Bajor, H McGuiness.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cosmetic dry skin often has a lower hydration level but a similar apparent barrier function, as measured by transepidermal water loss (TEWL), than that of the normal skin. To investigate the intrinsic difference in barrier property and moisture-holding ability between the cosmetic dry and normal skin, we developed a new clinical and data analysis procedure based on sequential tape-stripping with TEWL measurement, coupled with chemical analysis for protein and natural moisturizing factors (NMF) in the stratum corneum.
METHODS: A clinical study consisting of 64 healthy Caucasian female subjects with normal and cosmetic dry skin was conducted according to our clinical and data collection protocols. After the baseline visual dryness assessment, 20 tape-strips were placed and removed on each test site using D-Squame tapes. TEWL was measured at baseline and after the 5th, 10th, 15th and 20th tape-strips. All tapes were analysed for protein mass via chemical extraction and the Pierce BCA protein assay, as well as using an infrared densitometry device SquameScan 850A. The stratum corneum thickness and barrier quality (water transport resistance per thickness of the stratum corneum) were decoupled from the apparent barrier function using the TEWL and protein data.
RESULTS: A linear relationship between 1/TEWL and cumulative protein removal was observed for both normal and cosmetic dry skin. However, the slope of the linear relation was significantly steeper for normal skin, and significantly more protein was removed from cosmetic dry skin. The results showed that on average, the barrier quality of the stratum corneum of the normal skin is about 40% higher than that of the dry skin, whereas the stratum corneum of the dry skin is about 30% thicker than that of the normal skin. In addition, the amount of SC removal in sequential tape-stripping is generally non-uniform.
CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that there are characteristic differences in the barrier property between normal and cosmetic dry skin. In comparison to the normal skin, the stratum corneum of the cosmetic dry skin is considerably thicker, however, with a lower barrier quality. The results also showed that the amount of the SC removal in sequential tape-stripping is generally non-uniform. Therefore, the number of tape strips is not a good indicator for the tape-stripping depth.
© 2014 Society of Cosmetic Scientists and the Société Française de Cosmétologie.

Entities:  

Keywords:  barrier function; chemical analysis; claim substantiation in vivo/in vitro; dry skin; moisturization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24397786     DOI: 10.1111/ics.12112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci        ISSN: 0142-5463            Impact factor:   2.970


  4 in total

1.  Resistance to water diffusion in the stratum corneum is depth-dependent.

Authors:  Mark D A van Logtestijn; Elisa Domínguez-Hüttinger; Georgios N Stamatas; Reiko J Tanaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Investigation of the Dermal Absorption and Irritation Potential of Sertaconazole Nitrate Anhydrous Gel.

Authors:  Mahima Manian; Kumpal Madrasi; Ayyappa Chaturvedula; Ajay K Banga
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 6.321

3.  Exploratory study to evaluate two clinical methods for assessing moisturizing effect on skin barrier repair.

Authors:  Jane Snatchfold; Darren Targett
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a moisture treatment cream containing three critical elements of natural skin moisturization.

Authors:  David H McDaniel; Jeffrey S Dover; Mitchell Wortzman; Diane B Nelson
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.696

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.