Literature DB >> 24397254

Clinical outcomes following the dispensing of ready-made and recycled spectacles: a systematic literature review.

Matthew G Pearce1.   

Abstract

Uncorrected refractive error is the leading cause of global visual impairment. Given resource constraints in developing countries, the gold standard method of refractive error correction, custom-made spectacles, is unlikely to be available for some time. Therefore, ready-made and recycled spectacles are in wide use in the developing world. To ensure that refractive error interventions are successful, it is important that only appropriate modes of refractive error correction are used. As a basis for policy development, a systematic literature review was conducted of interventional studies analysing visual function, patient satisfaction and continued use outcomes of ready-made and recycled spectacles dispensed to individuals in developing countries with refractive errors or presbyopia. PubMed and CINAHL were searched by MESH terms and keywords related to ready-made and recycled spectacle interventions, yielding 185 non-duplicated papers. After applying exclusion criteria, eight papers describing seven studies of clinical outcomes of dispensing ready-made spectacles were retained for analysis. The two randomised controlled trials and five non-experimental studies suggest that ready-made spectacles can provide sufficient visual function for a large portion of the world's population with refractive error, including those with astigmatism and/or anisometropia. The follow-up period for many of the studies was too short to confidently comment on patient satisfaction and continued-use outcomes. No studies were found that met inclusion criteria and discussed recycled spectacles. The literature also notes concerns about quality and cost effectiveness of recycled spectacles, as well as their tendency to increase developing countries' reliance on outside sources of help. In light of the findings, the dispensing of ready-made spectacles should be favoured over the dispensing of recycled spectacles in developing countries.
© 2014 The Author. Clinical and Experimental Optometry © 2014 Optometrists Association Australia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  public health; ready-made spectacles; recycled spectacles; refractive errors

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24397254     DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Optom        ISSN: 0816-4622            Impact factor:   2.742


  9 in total

1.  Grading Sphero-Cylinder Spectacle Similarity.

Authors:  Robert W Arnold; Joshua S Beveridge; Samuel J Martin; Nathanael R Beveridge; Elise J Metzger; Kyle A Smith
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2021-01-20

Review 2.  Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school-age children and adolescents.

Authors:  Jennifer R Evans; Priya Morjaria; Christine Powell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-15

3.  Vision Stations: Addressing Corrective Vision Needs With Low-cost Technologies.

Authors:  Stephen A Martin; Elizabeth A Frutiger
Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med       Date:  2015-03

Review 4.  Heart Rate Variability: New Perspectives on Physiological Mechanisms, Assessment of Self-regulatory Capacity, and Health risk.

Authors:  Rollin McCraty; Fred Shaffer
Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med       Date:  2015-01

Review 5.  The quality of systematic reviews about interventions for refractive error can be improved: a review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Evan Mayo-Wilson; Sueko Matsumura Ng; Roy S Chuck; Tianjing Li
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Evaluation of vision screening of 5-15-year-old children in three Tongan schools: comparison of The Auckland Optotypes and Lea symbols.

Authors:  Lisa M Hamm; Fiona Langridge; Joanna M Black; Nicola S Anstice; Mele Vuki; Toakase Fakakovikaetau; Cameron C Grant; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Ellipsoid Spectacle Comparison of Plusoptix, Retinomax and 2WIN Autorefractors.

Authors:  Robert W Arnold; Samuel J Martin; Joshua R Beveridge; Andrew W Arnold; Stephanie L Arnold; Nathanael R Beveridge; Kyle A Smith
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-08-30

Review 8.  Refractive error in underserved adults: causes and potential solutions.

Authors:  V Swetha E Jeganathan; Alan L Robin; Maria A Woodward
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.761

9.  Awareness of Presbyopia among Rural Female Population in North Karnataka.

Authors:  Charushila V Gajapati; A V Pradeep; Anupama Kakhandaki; R K Praveenchandra; Sanjana Rao
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-09-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.