Literature DB >> 24396917

A serological survey of brucellosis in wild ungulate species from five game parks in Zimbabwe.

Tatenda R Motsi, Shadreck C Tichiwangana, Gift Matope, Norman L Mukarati.   

Abstract

A retrospective serosurvey was carried out between 2009 and 2012 to detect antibodies to Brucella spp. in free-ranging African wildlife ungulates from five selected game parks in Zimbabwe. Samples were drawn from wildlife-livestock interface and non-interface areas in Zimbabwe. A total of 270 serum samples from four different species, namely African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) (n =106), impala (Aepyceros melampus) (n = 72), black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis) (n = 45) and white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) (n = 47), were tested. The percentage of positive samples was 17.0% in buffalo (18/106; 95% CI: 9.72% – 24.1%) and 1.4% in impala (1/72; 95% CI: 0% – 4.2%). No antibodies to Brucella spp. were detected in the two rhinoceros species. The difference in the percentage of seropositive cases between buffalo and impala was significant (p < 0.05). Seropositivity to Brucella spp. was higher (19.1%) in adult buffalo compared with juveniles and sub-adults younger than six years (5.9%). Further, seropositivity was marginally higher (20.4%) in animals from wildlife-livestock interface areas than in those from non-interface areas (13.45%; OR = 1.45) although the difference was not statistically significant. The study showed that brucellosis could be more widespread in buffalo and may circulate in this species independently in the absence of contact with cattle, whilst rhinoceros may be considered less susceptible to brucellosis. The role of the wildlife-livestock interface in the epidemiology of brucellosis in wildlife and livestock is probably overstated but needs to be explored further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24396917     DOI: 10.4102/ojvr.v80i1.586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Onderstepoort J Vet Res        ISSN: 0030-2465            Impact factor:   1.792


  6 in total

1.  Spatial predictors of bovine tuberculosis infection and Brucella spp. exposure in pastoralist and agropastoralist livestock herds in the Ruaha ecosystem of Tanzania.

Authors:  Annette Roug; Deana Clifford; Joana Mazet; Rudovick Kazwala; Julius John; Peter Coppolillo; Woutrina Smith
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Quantitative analysis of risk factors associated with brucellosis in livestock in the Katavi-Rukwa ecosystem, Tanzania.

Authors:  Justine A Assenga; Lucas E Matemba; Joseph J Malakalinga; Shabani K Muller; Rudovick R Kazwala
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  A serological survey of brucellosis in wildlife in four major National Parks of Uganda.

Authors:  Robert Aruho; Ewan T MacLeod; Leonard Manirakiza; Innocent B Rwego
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Seroprevalence of Brucellosis in Buffalo Worldwide and Associated Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jun-Feng Shi; Qing-Long Gong; Bo Zhao; Bao-Yi Ma; Zi-Yang Chen; Yang Yang; Yu-Han Sun; Qi Wang; Xue Leng; Ying Zong; Jian-Ming Li; Rui Du
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-04

5.  Living at the edge of an interface area in Zimbabwe: cattle owners, commodity chain and health workers' awareness, perceptions and practices on zoonoses.

Authors:  B M Gadaga; E M C Etter; B Mukamuri; K J Makwangudze; D M Pfukenyi; G Matope
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Brucellosis in wildlife in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gregory Simpson; Peter N Thompson; Claude Saegerman; Tanguy Marcotty; Jean-Jacques Letesson; Xavier de Bolle; Jacques Godfroid
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.