Literature DB >> 2439685

Sound-meaning relationships in speakers of Urdu and English: evidence for a cross-cultural phonetic symbolism.

M W O'Boyle, D A Miller, F Rahmani.   

Abstract

Twelve English- and 12 Urdu-speaking males, ranging in age from 18 to 30 years, were asked to assign pure-tone frequencies as a "best fit" to visually presented shapes. Six basic figures were employed (circle, ellipse, right triangle, isosceles triangle, along with two historical psycholinguistic forms--uloomu and takete) and varied on three dimensions of size, complexity, and density. The results of the study indicate that there was consistency in the assignment of pure-tone frequencies to the dimensions of the figures and that the pattern of assignment was generally similar for both English- and Urdu-speaking subjects alike. Specifically, for both language groups, round figures (circles and ellipses) were assigned significantly lower frequencies than other stimuli. Also, complex and dense figures (i.e., those designed to simulate "visual depth" and "visual texture," respectively) received significantly higher frequency settings than those stimuli not possessing these dimensions. Additional analyses revealed several factors that may have contributed to the observed pattern. For example, Urdu subjects of the English proficiency produced frequency assignments that closely resembled those of the English-speaking subjects, while subjects of low English proficiency produced a pattern that was somewhat different, particularly with regard to round, complex figures. Length of residency in the United States (6 months, 1 year, or 2 years), however, did not significantly influence frequency assignments for the Urdu subjects. These results are discussed in terms of "cross-cultural" versus "language-specific" phonetic symbolism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2439685     DOI: 10.1007/bf01067547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  11 in total

1.  A STUDY OF PHONETIC SYMBOLISM AMONG NATIVE NAVAJO SPEAKERS.

Authors:  J ATZET; H B GERARD
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1965-05

2.  Phonetic symbolism in natural languages.

Authors:  R W BROWN; A H BLACK; A E HOROWITZ
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1955-05

3.  Phonetic symbolism re-examined.

Authors:  I K TAYLOR
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1963-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Phonetic symbolism in four unrelated languages.

Authors:  I K TAYLOR; M M TAYLOR
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1962-12

5.  The fitness of names to drawings. A cross-cultural study in Tanganyika.

Authors:  R DAVIS
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1961-08

6.  An investigation of phonetic symbolism.

Authors:  L O BROOKS; I MALTZMAN; L MORRISETT
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1956-09

7.  A cross-linguistic investigation of phonetic symbolism.

Authors:  M S MIRON
Journal:  J Abnorm Soc Psychol       Date:  1961-05

8.  Implications for phonetic symbolism: the relationship between pure tones and geometric figures.

Authors:  M W O'Boyle; R D Tarte
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1980-11

9.  Phonetic symbolism in adult native speakers of English: three studies.

Authors:  R D Tarte; L S Barritt
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1971 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.500

10.  Another look at phonetic symbolism.

Authors:  I K Taylor; M M Taylor
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  1 in total

1.  Phonological and orthographic influences in the bouba-kiki effect.

Authors:  Christine Cuskley; Julia Simner; Simon Kirby
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-09-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.