Literature DB >> 24396464

Prognostic value of the BRAF V600E mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Guoping He1, Baojian Zhao2, Xu Zhang2, Rixiang Gong3.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of the BRAF V600E mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and to determine the correlation between this mutation and indicators of poor prognosis and outcome in patients with PTC. The BRAF V600E mutation status was analyzed in 187 tumor samples using the multiplex allele-specific PCR method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the association of the BRAF V600E mutation with clinical features and patient outcome. The sensitivity of the multiplex allele-specific PCR combined with denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography reached ~1%. The BRAF V600E mutation was observed in 63.6% (119/187) of tumor tissues, predominantly in PTC specimens, and no BRAF mutation was identified in other benign-type thyroid diseases. The univariate analysis indicated that the BRAF V600E mutation was associated with age, tumor stage and prognosis (P<0.05). In addition, the frequency of the BRAF V600E mutation was significantly different in the central (75.3%) and lateral neck (49.3%) lymph nodes of patients with lymph node metastasis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the BRAF V600E mutation (HR, 2.471; 95% CI, 1.149-5.312) and lymph node metastasis (HR, 3.003; 95% CI, 1.027-8.771) are independent factors that predict tumor prognosis. Thus, the BRAF V600E mutation is an independent risk factor that may be used to predict thyroid cancer persistence/recurrence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF V600E; papillary thyroid carcinoma; prognostic value

Year:  2013        PMID: 24396464      PMCID: PMC3881916          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2013.1713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


Introduction

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is a common endocrine tumor with an incidence that has increased over recent decades in China. PCT exhibits a high cure rate with 10-year patient survival rates estimated at 80–90% (1). Currently, surgery remains the predominant treatment option for PTC; however, even following curative resection, 20–30% of PTC patients experience recurrence and/or metastasis, which is associated with increased mortality (2). Numerous clinical and pathological factors, including age, gender, tumor size, histological type, tumor interstitial fibrosis and extrathyroidal infiltration, have been shown to have limited prognostic value in PTC (2–7). In recent years, the study of the molecular mechanisms of PTC has demonstrated that the BRAF gene mutation is a significant event in the process of this disease. The V600E mutation of the BRAF gene was identified in 28–83% of PTC specimens, however, no mutations were observed in normal thyroid tissue and tissue from patients with benign thyroid disease (4,8–11). A large number of studies have demonstrated that the BRAF gene mutation is associated with pathological features, including patient age, extrathyroidal invasion, lymph node metastasis and tumor stage, which aid in determining patient prognosis (5,6,12–14). In the present study, multiplex allele-specific PCR technology combined with denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) was established to investigate the correlation between the BRAF gene mutation and the clinical features, pathological diagnosis, treatment and prognosis in 187 patients with PTC. The BRAF V600E mutation was observed in PTC, while no BRAF mutations were identified in benign-type thyroid diseases. In addition, significant correlations were observed between the BRAF mutation and age (>45 years), tumor-lymph node-metastasis stage and tumor persistence/recurrence.

Patients and methods

Patients

To be eligible for the study, patients were required to present with pathologically confirmed PTC according to the tumor-lymph node-metastasis classification system of the International Union against Cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Tumor samples and 20 adjacent normal tissues were obtained from 187 patients in the West China Hospital, Sichuan University (Sichuan, China) between May 2009 and May 2011 for use in this study. The study was reviewed and approved by the West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients. Thyroid cancer K1 cells with the BRAF V600E mutation and RO82-W-1 cells with wild-type BRAF were obtained from the Molecular Biology Laboratory of the West China Hospital. All patients underwent total or near-total thyroidectomy. Patients were then routinely observed as outpatients, typically every 6–12 months, and were evaluated for cancer persistence/recurrence with serum thyroglobulin (Tg) testing during the 2-year follow-up. For all cases, persistent/recurrent PTC was defined as a detectable basal serum Tg level (>1 ng/ml) (9). A total of 176 patients completed follow-up.

DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was isolated from formalin-fixed parafin-embedded tissue sections with a Qiagen TIANamp genomic DNA kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and from cells lines with a Tiangen genomic DNA extraction kit (Tiangen Biotech, Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and a UV photometer (UVP, Upland, CA, USA).

PCR primers

The BRAF mutation primers (BRAF mut) were designed based on the BRAF sequence, with a mismatched nucleotide at the 3′ end, so that wild-type BRAF was not amplified by these primers. The length of the PCR products was 126 bp. The BRAF sequencing primers (BRAF seq) were also designed. In addition, TBXAS1 was chosen as a reference gene. Information concerning these primers is listed in Table I.
Table I

Allele-specific PCR primer sequences for the BRAF gene.

GenesSequencePCR products, bp
BRAF mutForward, 5′-GGTGATTTTGGTCTAGCTACATA-3′126
Reverse, 5′-GGCCAAAAATTTAATCAGTGG-3′
TBXAS1Forward, 5′-GCCCGACATTCTGCAAGTCC-3′100
Reverse, 5′-GGTGTTGCCGGGAAGGGTT-3′
BRAF seqForward, 5′-CTCTTCATAATGCTTGCTCTG-3′269
Reverse, 5′-GAGACCTTCAATGACTTTCTAGTAAC-3′

BRAF mut, BRAF mutation primers; BRAF seq, BRAF sequencing primers.

Multiplex PCR amplification

BRAF and TBXAS1 genes were amplified in the same 25-μl amplification system, which included 30 ng DNA templates, 10 pmol BRAF primers, 5 pmol TBXAS1 primers, 0.1 mol/l dNTPs and 1.5 units Taq enzyme. The thermal cycling protocol for PCR involved an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 5 min followed by 30 cycles at 94°C for 30 sec, 54°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 30 sec. The BRAF gene was amplified in a 50 μl amplification system for direct sequencing.

DHPLC

DHPLC was performed using the Transgenomic Wave Nucleic Acid Fragment Analysis system with a DNASep column (Transgenomic, Omaha, NE, USA). The mobile phases comprised 0.05% acetonitrile in 0.1 M triethylammonium acetate (TEAA; eluent A) and 25% acetonitrile in 0.1 M TEAA (eluent B). The PCR products were denatured at 95°C for 5 min and then cooled to 50°C to allow the formation of heterozygote DNA. A 0.9-ml/min flow rate was used, and the ultraviolet detector was set at 260 nm. The results were analyzed by Navigator software (Transgenomic, Omaha, NE, USA). The heterozygous profiles were investigated by visual inspection of the chromatograms on the basis of the appearance of additional later-eluting peaks. Corresponding homozygous profiles showed only one peak. To determine the detection limit of DHPLC, DNA was extracted from the RO82-W-1 (BRAF wild-type) and K1 (BRAF V600E mutation) cells. Serial mixtures (BRAF V600E/Total DNA, 50, 25, 10, 3 and 1%) were made for the DHPLC analysis.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and a χ2 test was used for the comparisons. The category data were estimated by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) in a meta-analysis. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Clinical data

A total of 187 cases of PTC, consisting of 159 females and 28 males (age, 8–80 years; mean ± SD, 42.57±12.88), were selected for systematic analysis. Among them, 59 patients presented with bilateral leaf papillary carcinoma, 47 with PTC of the left lobe, 78 with PTC of the right lobe and three with papillary carcinoma of the thyroid isthmus.

Multiplex allele-specific PCR sensitivity detection

In order to investigate the sensitivity of multiplex allele-specific PCR combined with DHPLC, different concentrations of V600E mutation PCR products (1, 3, 10, 25 and 50%) were detected by this method. According to the DHPLC results, two elution peaks were observed in the presence of a V600E mutation (Fig. 1); the right elution peak was due to the BRAF mutation and the left was due to the internal reference TBXAS1 gene. It was demonstrated that multiplex allele-specific PCR detection sensitivity may be up to 1% (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Results of multiplex allele-specific PCR detection of BRAF V600E mutation sensitivity. 1–50%, different concentrations of the positive control; negative control, RO82-W-1 cells.

Prevalence of BRAF V600E mutation in PTC samples

The BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 63.6% (119/187) of PTCs (Fig. 2A). No mutation was identified in the 20 benign thyroid lesions (data not shown). In addition, these results were confirmed by direct sequencing (Fig. 2B).
Figure 2

Representative results of denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) and sequencing for BRAF V600E mutations. (A) BRAF V600E mutations were detected in several samples using multiplex allele-specific PCR. A low level mutation peak was observed in sample 16. (B) BRAF V600E mutations were detected by direct sequencing; a low level mutation was observed in sample 5 and no mutation was identified in sample 16.

Association of BRAF V600E mutation status with PTC pathological features

In patients with conventional PTC, the BRAF V600E mutation was associated with age, tumor stage and prognosis (P<0.05). However, the frequency of the BRAF V600E mutation was not correlated with gender, tumor size, lymph node metastasis or location of the lesion (Table II). In addition, the BRAF V600E mutation was significantly different in the central lymph nodes and lateral neck lymph nodes (75.3 vs. 49.3%; P=0.002) of patients with lymph node metastasis.
Table II

Correlation analysis between BRAF V600E mutation and clinical features.

BRAF V600E mutation, %

Clinical featuresCases, nPositiveNegativeP-value
Gender0.401
 Male28208
 Female1599960
Age, years0.002
 >45755817
 <451126151
Tumor size, cm0.279
 >21449549
 ≤2432419
Lymph node metastasis0.582
 N11469155
 N0412813
Metastasis region0.002
 Central node735518
 Lateral node733637
Tumor stage
 I and II11966530.003
 III and IV685315
Unilateral or bilateral lesions0.138
 Bilateral593326
 Unilateral1258540
Lesion location0.698
 Left lobe473116
 Right lobe785424
Prognosis0.03
 Normal1176948
 Relapse/metastasis594514

BRAF V600E mutation status as a prognostic factor in PTC

A correlation analysis of PTC diagnosis and clinical features was conducted. Based on the univariate analysis, tumor recurrence/metastasis was associated with tumor size and lymph metastasis, but not with gender, age and tumor stage. Furthermore, the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that lymph node metastasis and BRAF V600E mutation were independent factors that predicted tumor prognosis (Table III).
Table III

Associations between the prognosis of PTC and clinical features.

Clinical featuresUnivariate analysis P-valueMultivariate regression analysis

P-valueHR95% CI
Gender0.1190.134
Age, years0.8710.999
Tumor size, cm0.0040.0742.5450.915–7.092
Lymph metastasis0.0030.0443.0031.027–8.771
Tumor stage0.4060.999
BRAF mutation0.0300.0212.4711.149–5.312

PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Discussion

BRAF V600E mutation detection in PTC demonstrated that the BRAF V600E mutation was present in ~63.6% of the tumor tissue samples, predominantly in those of PTC. In addition, no BRAF mutations were observed in other benign-type thyroid diseases, indicating that this genetic event was likely to be a key determinant of the papillary cancer phenotype. The occurrence and development of PTC involves multiple genetic abnormalities, in which the BRAF V600E gene mutation is the most common variant and contributes to the destabilization of the kinase encoded by the gene. The majority of studies have demonstrated that the BRAF V600E mutation is common in PTC and that the frequency varies from 18 to 87%. Although certain studies have indicated that geographical and histological subtype classification factors may account for these differences, the reliability of the detection method must also be taken into consideration (7,15). In the present study, multiplex allele-specific PCR combined with DHPLC was used to detect the mutation. It was demonstrated that detection sensitivity may be up to 1% by this method, showing that this would be a reliable method of detection in clinical samples. Although the prognostic value of the BRAF V600E mutation in PTC is controversial, several studies have observed an association between the mutation and a poor prognosis (5,13,16). To analyze this association in Chinese patients, 187 PTC samples were analyzed for the mutation and its association with clinical features. It was observed that the BRAF V600E mutation was associated with age, tumor stage and prognosis. In addition, the frequency of the BRAF V600E mutation was significantly different in the central and lateral neck lymph nodes of patients with lymph node metastasis, which is consistent with previous studies (14,17,18). However, the BRAF V600E mutation was not correlated with gender, tumor size, lymph node metastasis and location of the lesion. Furthermore, the correlation of a PTC diagnosis and the clinical features were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The results indicated that tumor persistence/metastasis was significantly associated with tumor size, lymph node metastasis and BRAF mutation in the univariate analysis. Concurrent with other studies, lymph node metastasis and BRAF mutation were independent factors in the prediction of tumor prognosis in the multivariate logistic regression analysis (Table III) (5,12,16,19,20). In conclusion, the BRAF V600E mutations in PTC and the lymph nodes are independent factors in the prediction of tumor prognosis. Moreover, the BRAF V600E mutation is significantly different in central lymph nodes and lateral neck lymph nodes of patients with lymph node metastasis. Testing for this mutation may be useful for selecting initial therapy mode and for follow-up monitoring in PTC patients.
  18 in total

1.  The association of the BRAF(V600E) mutation with prognostic factors and poor clinical outcome in papillary thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tae Hyuk Kim; Young Joo Park; Jung Ah Lim; Hwa Young Ahn; Eun Kyung Lee; You Jin Lee; Kyung Won Kim; Seo Kyung Hahn; Yeo Kyu Youn; Kwang Hyun Kim; Bo Youn Cho; Do Joon Park
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Clinical impact of cervical lymph node involvement and central neck dissection in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 368 cases.

Authors:  Alexandre Bozec; Olivier Dassonville; Emmanuel Chamorey; Gilles Poissonnet; Anne Sudaka; Isabelle Peyrottes; Francette Ettore; Juliette Haudebourg; Françoise Bussière; Danielle Benisvy; Pierre-Yves Marcy; Jean Louis Sadoul; Paul Hofman; Sandra Lassale; Jacques Vallicioni; François Demard; José Santini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Both BRAF V600E mutation and older age (≥ 65 years) are associated with recurrent papillary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Gina M Howell; Sally E Carty; Michaele J Armstrong; Shane O Lebeau; Steven P Hodak; Christopher Coyne; Michael T Stang; Kelly L McCoy; Marina N Nikiforova; Yuri E Nikiforov; Linwah Yip
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  BRAF mutation in thyroid cancer.

Authors:  M Xing
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.678

5.  High rate of BRAF and RET/PTC dual mutations associated with recurrent papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Ying C Henderson; Thomas D Shellenberger; Michelle D Williams; Adel K El-Naggar; Mitchell J Fredrick; Kathleen M Cieply; Gary L Clayman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  BRAF kinase in melanoma development and progression.

Authors:  Amena M DeLuca; Archana Srinivas; Rhoda M Alani
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Med       Date:  2008-02-18       Impact factor: 5.600

7.  BRAF mutation associated with other genetic events identifies a subset of aggressive papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Angela M Costa; Agustín Herrero; Manuel F Fresno; Jonas Heymann; José Antonio Alvarez; Jose Cameselle-Teijeiro; Ginesa García-Rostán
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 3.478

8.  BRAF mutation testing of thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens for preoperative risk stratification in papillary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Mingzhao Xing; Douglas Clark; Haixia Guan; Meiju Ji; Alan Dackiw; Kathryn A Carson; Matthew Kim; Anthony Tufaro; Paul Ladenson; Martha Zeiger; Ralph Tufano
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Impact of lymph node metastases identified on central neck dissection (CND) on the recurrence of papillary thyroid cancer: potential role of BRAFV600E mutation in defining CND.

Authors:  Ali S Alzahrani; Mingzhao Xing
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 5.678

10.  Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer.

Authors:  Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  12 in total

1.  The BRAF V600E mutation predicts poor survival outcome in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: a meta analysis.

Authors:  Jianhua Li; Shuijun Zhang; Shouhua Zheng; Danhua Zhang; Xinguang Qiu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-12-15

2.  A combination of immunohistochemistry and molecular approaches improves highly sensitive detection of BRAF mutations in papillary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Claudia Martinuzzi; Lorenza Pastorino; Virginia Andreotti; Anna Garuti; Michele Minuto; Roberto Fiocca; Giovanna Bianchi-Scarrà; Paola Ghiorzo; Federica Grillo; Luca Mastracci
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  The utility of the Bethesda category and its association with BRAF mutation in the prediction of papillary thyroid cancer stage.

Authors:  Augustas Beiša; Mindaugas Kvietkauskas; Virgilijus Beiša; Mindaugas Stoškus; Elvyra Ostanevičiūtė; Eugenijus Jasiūnas; Laimonas Griškevičius; Kęstutis Strupas
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  The Combination of RET, BRAF and Demographic Data Identifies Subsets of Patients with Aggressive Papillary Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Jose R W Martínez; Sergio Vargas-Salas; Soledad Urra Gamboa; Estefanía Muñoz; José Miguel Domínguez; Augusto León; Nicolás Droppelmann; Antonieta Solar; Mark Zafereo; F Christopher Holsinger; Hernán E González
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 3.869

5.  Associations between BRAF(V600E) and prognostic factors and poor outcomes in papillary thyroid carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chunping Liu; Tianwen Chen; Zeming Liu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  First-Line Use of Vemurafenib to Enable Thyroidectomy and Radioactive Iodine Ablation for BRAF-Positive Metastatic Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Case Report.

Authors:  Bao D Dao; Ildiko Lingvay; Joseph Sailors; Michael Landay; Gabriel Shapiro
Journal:  J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep       Date:  2015-09-03

7.  BRAF-V600E immunohistochemistry in a large series of glial and glial-neuronal tumors.

Authors:  Quentin Breton; Hélène Plouhinec; Delphine Prunier-Mirebeau; Blandine Boisselier; Sophie Michalak; Philippe Menei; Audrey Rousseau
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.708

8.  Genetic Alterations and Their Clinical Implications in High-Recurrence Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Min-Young Lee; Bo Mi Ku; Hae Su Kim; Ji Yun Lee; Sung Hee Lim; Jong-Mu Sun; Se-Hoon Lee; Keunchil Park; Young Lyun Oh; Mineui Hong; Han-Sin Jeong; Young-Ik Son; Chung-Hwan Baek; Myung-Ju Ahn
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 4.679

9.  The Impact of BRAF Mutation on the Recurrence of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xin Li; Hyungju Kwon
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  The Emerging Role of Insulin Receptor Isoforms in Thyroid Cancer: Clinical Implications and New Perspectives.

Authors:  Veronica Vella; Roberta Malaguarnera
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.