Literature DB >> 24396092

Comparing dosing of basal insulin analogues detemir and glargine: is it really unit-per-unit and dose-per-dose?

Juliet P Wallace1, Jessica L Wallace, M Shawn McFarland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the available evidence regarding dosing conversion between glargine and detemir in an effort to assist clinicians in performing dosing conversion. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE literature search was performed using the search terms glargine and detemir for articles published through August 2013. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language clinical trials were reviewed for inclusion of dosing and/or pharmacokinetic data. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 7 large (n ≥ 258) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing glargine and detemir in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes had dosing equivalency data available. In these 7 RCTs, on average, a 38% higher detemir dose was required (range = 8.0%-77.2%) to achieve glucose control comparable to that achieved with glargine. A 24-hour isoglycemic clamp study conducted in 11 patients with type 1 diabetes demonstrated that the duration of action of detemir is dose dependent, with increasing doses of detemir resulting in increased duration of action of detemir. Pharmacokinetic studies conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes are conflicting, although the majority of evidence suggests that glargine provides a longer duration of glycemic control as compared with detemir.
CONCLUSIONS: When performing conversion between glargine and detemir, prescribers should be aware that higher doses of detemir as compared with glargine may be necessary to achieve the same glycemic control. Additionally, twice-daily injections of detemir should be considered in clinical situations in which glucose control appears to decline after 12 hours, especially with doses ≤0.4 units/kg/d in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adult medicine; ambulatory care; clinical decision making; clinical pharmacy; diabetes; dosing; insulin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24396092     DOI: 10.1177/1060028013518420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  4 in total

Review 1.  rDNA insulin glargine U300 - a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Stefanie Zassman; Philip A Goldberg
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 3.168

Review 2.  Understanding the Clinical Profile of Insulin Degludec, the Latest Basal Insulin Approved for Use in Canada: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Vincent Woo; Lori Berard; Robert Roscoe
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.945

3.  Clinical and Cost Implications of Insulin Degludec in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes and Problematic Hypoglycemia: A Quality Improvement Project.

Authors:  Muhammad Ali Karamat; Shujah Dar; Srikanth Bellary; Abd A Tahrani
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.945

4.  Insulin Detemir Versus Insulin Glargine in the Hospital: Do Hypoglycemia Rates Differ?

Authors:  Michelle A Crisher; Christopher A Giuliano; Carrie L Hartner
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2019-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.