Literature DB >> 24396027

Beat-to-beat, reading-to-reading, and day-to-day blood pressure variability in relation to organ damage in untreated Chinese.

Fang-Fei Wei1, Yan Li, Lu Zhang, Ting-Yan Xu, Feng-Hua Ding, Ji-Guang Wang, Jan A Staessen.   

Abstract

Whether target organ damage is associated with blood pressure (BP) variability independent of level remains debated. We assessed these associations from 10-minute beat-to-beat, 24-hour ambulatory, and 7-day home BP recordings in 256 untreated subjects referred to a hypertension clinic. BP variability indices were variability independent of the mean, maximum-minimum difference, and average real variability. Effect sizes (standardized β) were computed using multivariable regression models. In beat-to-beat recordings, left ventricular mass index (n=128) was not (P≥0.18) associated with systolic BP but increased with all 3 systolic variability indices (+2.97-3.53 g/m(2); P<0.04); the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio increased (P≤0.03) with systolic BP (+1.14-1.17 mg/mmol) and maximum-minimum difference (+1.18 mg/mmol); and pulse wave velocity increased with systolic BP (+0.69 m/s; P<0.001). In 24-hour recordings, all 3 indices of organ damage increased (P<0.03) with systolic BP, whereas the associations with BP variability were nonsignificant (P≥0.15) except for increases in pulse wave velocity (P<0.05) with variability independent of the mean (+0.16 m/s) and maximum-minimum difference (+0.17 m/s). In home recordings, the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (+1.27-1.30 mg/mmol) and pulse wave velocity (+0.36-0.40 m/s) increased (P<0.05) with systolic BP, whereas all associations of target organ damage with the variability indices were nonsignificant (P≥0.07). In conclusion, while accounting for BP level, associations of target organ damage with BP variability were readily detectable in beat-to-beat recordings, least noticeable in home recordings, with 24-hour ambulatory monitoring being informative only for pulse wave velocity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory; blood pressure monitoring, home; clinical laboratory science

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24396027     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  41 in total

Review 1.  Does blood pressure variability contribute to risk stratification? Methodological issues and a review of outcome studies based on home blood pressure.

Authors:  Kei Asayama; Fang-Fei Wei; Yan-Ping Liu; Azusa Hara; Yu-Mei Gu; Rudolph Schutte; Yan Li; Lutgarde Thijs; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.872

2.  In Search of a Predictive Model for Preeclampsia: The Beat Goes On.

Authors:  Rikki M Tanner; Natalie A Bello
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Augmented resting beat-to-beat blood pressure variability in young, healthy, non-Hispanic black men.

Authors:  Benjamin E Young; Jasdeep Kaur; Jennifer R Vranish; Brandi Y Stephens; Thales C Barbosa; Jane N Cloud; Jing Wang; David M Keller; Paul J Fadel
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.969

4.  The Impact of High Dietary Sodium Consumption on Blood Pressure Variability in Healthy, Young Adults.

Authors:  Kamila U Migdal; Matthew C Babcock; Austin T Robinson; Joseph C Watso; Megan M Wenner; Sean D Stocker; William B Farquhar
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 5.  Within-Home Blood Pressure Variability on a Single Occasion Has Clinical Significance.

Authors:  Seiichi Shibasaki; Satoshi Hoshide; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-12

6.  Association of Blood Pressure Trajectories in Early Life with Subclinical Renal Damage in Middle Age.

Authors:  Wenling Zheng; Jianjun Mu; Chao Chu; Jiawen Hu; Yu Yan; Qiong Ma; Yongbo Lv; Xianjing Xu; Keke Wang; Yang Wang; Ying Deng; Bo Yan; Ruihai Yang; Jun Yang; Yong Ren; Zuyi Yuan
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  A Comparative Study on Skin and Plasma Advanced Glycation End Products and Their Associations with Arterial Stiffness.

Authors:  Chang-Yuan Liu; Qi-Fang Huang; Yi-Bang Cheng; Qian-Hui Guo; Qi Chen; Yan Li; Ji-Guang Wang
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-21

Review 8.  Labile hypertension: a new disease or a variability phenomenon?

Authors:  Elias Sanidas; Charalampos Grassos; Dimitrios P Papadopoulos; Maria Velliou; Kostas Tsioufis; Marina Mantzourani; Despoina Perrea; Dimitrios Iliopoulos; John Barbetseas; Vasilios Papademetriou
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 9.  Blood pressure variability: its relevance for cardiovascular homeostasis and cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Camilla Torlasco; Martino Pengo; Grzegorz Bilo; Juan Eugenio Ochoa
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 10.  Hypertension, Blood Pressure Variability, and Target Organ Lesion.

Authors:  Maria-Cláudia Irigoyen; Kátia De Angelis; Fernando Dos Santos; Daniela R Dartora; Bruno Rodrigues; Fernanda Marciano Consolim-Colombo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.