Literature DB >> 24395945

The population value of quality indicator reporting: a framework for prioritizing health care performance measures.

David O Meltzer, Jeanette W Chung.   

Abstract

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports contain more than 250 quality indicators, such as whether a patient with a suspected heart attack received an aspirin. The Department of Health and Human Services National Quality Measures Clearinghouse identifies more than 2,100 such indicators. Because resources for making quality improvements are limited, there is a need to prioritize among these indicators. We propose an approach to assess how reporting specific quality indicators would change care to improve the length and quality of life of the US population. Using thirteen AHRQ quality indicators with readily available data on the benefits of indicator reporting, we found that seven of them account for 93 percent of total benefits, while the remaining six account for only 7 percent of total benefits. Use of a framework such as this could focus resources on indicators having the greatest expected impact on population health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Access To Care; Health Reform; Quality Of Care

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24395945     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  6 in total

1.  Using a Health Economic Framework to Prioritize Quality Indicators: An Example With Smoking Cessation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Austin Nam; David M J Naimark; Matthew B Stanbrook; Murray D Krahn
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2019-05-27

Review 2.  Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework.

Authors:  Jean-Frederic Levesque; Kim Sutherland
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Purpose, Subject, and Consumer Comment on "Perceived Burden Due to Registrations for Quality Monitoring and Improvement in Hospitals: A Mixed Methods Study".

Authors:  Sylvia J Hysong; Patrick O'Mahen; Jochen Profit; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2022-04-01

4.  Safety-net institutions in the US grapple with new cholesterol treatment guidelines: a qualitative analysis from the PHoENIX Network.

Authors:  Valy Fontil; Courtney R Lyles; Dean Schillinger; Margaret A Handley; Sara Ackerman; Gato Gourley; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Urmimala Sarkar
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2018-07-12

5.  The importance of local epidemic conditions in monitoring progress towards HIV epidemic control in Kenya: a modelling study.

Authors:  Sarah-Jane Anderson; Geoffrey P Garnett; Joanne Enstone; Timothy B Hallett
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.396

6.  Balancing patient priorities for technical and interactional aspects of care in a measure of primary care quality.

Authors:  Carol Mulder; Nadiya Sunderji
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 1.458

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.