Literature DB >> 24395677

A comparison of facial expression properties in five hylobatid species.

Linda Scheider1, Katja Liebal, Leonardo Oña, Anne Burrows, Bridget Waller.   

Abstract

Little is known about facial communication of lesser apes (family Hylobatidae) and how their facial expressions (and use of) relate to social organization. We investigated facial expressions (defined as combinations of facial movements) in social interactions of mated pairs in five different hylobatid species belonging to three different genera using a recently developed objective coding system, the Facial Action Coding System for hylobatid species (GibbonFACS). We described three important properties of their facial expressions and compared them between genera. First, we compared the rate of facial expressions, which was defined as the number of facial expressions per units of time. Second, we compared their repertoire size, defined as the number of different types of facial expressions used, independent of their frequency. Third, we compared the diversity of expression, defined as the repertoire weighted by the rate of use for each type of facial expression. We observed a higher rate and diversity of facial expression, but no larger repertoire, in Symphalangus (siamangs) compared to Hylobates and Nomascus species. In line with previous research, these results suggest siamangs differ from other hylobatids in certain aspects of their social behavior. To investigate whether differences in facial expressions are linked to hylobatid socio-ecology, we used a Phylogenetic General Least Square (PGLS) regression analysis to correlate those properties with two social factors: group-size and level of monogamy. No relationship between the properties of facial expressions and these socio-ecological factors was found. One explanation could be that facial expressions in hylobatid species are subject to phylogenetic inertia and do not differ sufficiently between species to reveal correlations with factors such as group size and monogamy level.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FACS; GibbonFACS; facial expression; gibbons; monogamy index

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24395677     DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Primatol        ISSN: 0275-2565            Impact factor:   2.371


  6 in total

Review 1.  Social variables exert selective pressures in the evolution and form of primate mimetic musculature.

Authors:  Anne M Burrows; Ly Li; Bridget M Waller; Jerome Micheletta
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Do Temporal Changes in Facial Expressions Help Identify Patients at Risk of Deterioration in Hospital Wards? A Post Hoc Analysis of the Visual Early Warning Score Study.

Authors:  Maria Isabel Madrigal-Garcia; Dawn Archer; Mervyn Singer; Marcos Rodrigues; Alex Shenfield; Jeronimo Moreno-Cuesta
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2020-05-06

3.  Primate modularity and evolution: first anatomical network analysis of primate head and neck musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  Vance Powell; Borja Esteve-Altava; Julia Molnar; Brian Villmoare; Alesha Pettit; Rui Diogo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Crested macaque facial movements are more intense and stereotyped in potentially risky social interactions.

Authors:  Peter R Clark; Bridget M Waller; Muhammad Agil; Jerome Micheletta
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 6.671

5.  NetFACS: Using network science to understand facial communication systems.

Authors:  Alexander Mielke; Bridget M Waller; Claire Pérez; Alan V Rincon; Julie Duboscq; Jérôme Micheletta
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-11-09

6.  Social Use of Facial Expressions in Hylobatids.

Authors:  Linda Scheider; Bridget M Waller; Leonardo Oña; Anne M Burrows; Katja Liebal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.